SHOCK: @RyanAFournier's bombshell report that Mark Meadows served as a FBI Confidential Human Source for the FBI while serving as Trump's Chief of Staff, if true, it the biggest scoop of the century.
In a recent tweet, Ryan Fournier, the Founder of Students for Trump and Executive Director of Radical Alert, brought forth allegations against Mark Meadows, asserting that he acted as a confidential human source during his tenure as President Trump’s Chief of Staff. These claims, if validated, could unveil a murky narrative of espionage and political intrigue resonating through the heart of the Trump administration.
According to Fournier’s reporting, Meadows allegedly donned a wire provided by the FBI to record his interactions with President Trump. This act, as portrayed by Fournier, transcends constitutional boundaries and ventures into a realm of criminality. Fournier emphasizes the magnitude of these allegations by drawing parallels with the Watergate scandal, hinting at a potential crisis of comparable or even greater scale.
Fournier’s narrative unfolds amidst confirmations from several Congress members and confidential informants, bolstering the credibility of his allegations. The reverberations of this disclosure have already echoed through the halls of Congress and media houses, underscoring the grave implications that lie ahead.
Meadows assumed the role of Chief of Staff from March 31, 2020, to January 20, 2021, a period during which the FBI was helmed by Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Director David Bowdich. The alleged espionage activities, if true, insinuate a concerted effort by high-ranking FBI officials to spy on the President, casting a long shadow of doubt over the integrity of these institutions. Furthermore, the timeline suggests that the Attorney General, William Barr, might have been cognizant of these undercover operations.
The discourse unfolds into a broader narrative, implicating mainstream media outlets in a potential cover-up, given the leaks from the FBI and DOJ that found their way to the public domain through these channels. The veil of secrecy that shrouded these alleged activities has, according to Fournier, been partially lifted, revealing a glimpse into the deep state that President Trump vehemently opposed.
These allegations, if substantiated, corroborate Trump's assertions regarding the existence of deep state operatives within the government framework. The alleged recruitment of Meadows as a confidential human source mirrors a sinister blueprint where unelected bureaucrats wield the power to spy on elected officials, raising serious questions about the democracy we inhabit.
The narrative ventures further into the murky waters of government surveillance, highlighting the alleged spying on congressional staff members investigating the FBI during the Russiagate saga. This scenario, as painted by Fournier, evokes a disconcerting image of a police state, where the powers vested in the President are subverted by clandestine operations orchestrated by those within his closest circles.
The essence of democracy is threatened when the sanctity of elected offices is breached by covert espionage activities. The allegations against Meadows, as reported by Fournier, beckon a thorough investigation to restore faith in the democratic pillars that uphold our nation. The unmasking of truth is imperative to ensure that the corridors of power remain unadulterated, fostering a political environment where the elected and the electorate can engage in a dialogue devoid of deceit and subterfuge.
3:10 PM · Oct 26, 2023
·
16.9K
Views
Someone brought cocaine into the WH. Why would wearing a wire be hard to believe?
Well for one, cocaine doesnt have an electromagnetic field.
One of the kids that works for me has a mass market EM detector. It picks up all kinds of EM fields. We tried it on my DeWalt cordless circular saw. He could detect the battery from 12 feet. We took the battery out and the detector could still see an EM field in the saw, albeit with far less range.
Any listening device would be picked up in a second by SS. They have far better equipment and expertise.
I guess my point was, they won’t look. They didn’t look. We can’t expect Trump to have walked around with a meter looking for signals. The people who should have looked, didn’t. On purpose. Just like they didn’t look for the person who left the cocaine, they knew who it was but wouldn’t look there.
This is a completely reasonable assertion. We don't know the truth, but you can't disregard this with the number of people in Trump's "inner circle" who have already turned on him publicly.