You may have posted it, but posting is no credential of truth. The support of a Jewish homeland is not connected to Jews? (I didn't say anything about the proponents of Zionism). The connection to Satanism is interesting, if true, but how do you make that argument? I can't help but wonder what you make of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I like it when people present their credentials. It confers the respect due to reality. If I may ask, what is your Ph.D. in? Are there particular topics where we agree? Or disagree?
The State of Israel was created by the Rothschilds and this is very evident in Israel with all the commemorations and landmarks there of the Rothschilds. There are other Jewish homelands that are "connected" to the Jews like Birobidzhan and earlier, the Pale of Settlement.. However, Israel is different and doesn't represent the will of its people. In fact, Israel is somewhat of a privately owned nation.....Think of the Hawaiian island of Lanai which is 98% owned by Larry Ellison, co-founder and chairman of Oracle Corporation. Yet, there is over 3,367 people that live there. This type of scenario is at the very foundation of Israel and its dictates ultimately come from the Rothschilds.
The Ph.D. I'm referring to is one with a detail thesis for recognizing bullsh!t artists like yourself. You know, those that like to readily "present their credentials". Just as Ugly People Are More Likely To Continue Wearing COVID Masks, bulls!t artists tout 'credentials' to seemingly con people. Every curriculum vitae starts with an identity. Without it, its all horse crap. Without revealing identities, it makes GAW a level playing field. Touting one's putative 'credentials' demonstrates a proclivity for showing pretentiousness and recognizable chutzpah. Let's look at your claimed "credentials". You wrote:
"What problem do I have with credentials? I have a bachelor of science, a master of science, and a master's of aeronautics and astronautics from the University of Washington (Seattle). I worked for 40 years at was began as the Boeing Aerospace Company and ended as its Defense and Information Division, interacting from time to time with Boeing Commercial Airplanes. I became an Associate Technical Fellow and had the highest performance ratings throughout my career. A key accomplishment was to edit and re-write what became the winning proposal for the YAL-1A airborne laser system, the most powerful military directed weapon yet constructed. I have 9 patents and preceded by about 5 year's NASA's invention of an afterburning nuclear thermal rocket engine. I had Secret, Top Secret, SCI, NATO Cosmic Top Secret, and Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information clearances. That's just skimming the record."
Here is some more of your ostentation.
"Unfortunately, "popular science" articles are written to a low intellectual standard, demanding something visual, and they have only cartoons to carry the burden. It would be better to think of it as a kind of schematic of what happened. The real data is probably a blip on a strip of graph paper (old school). Not very inspiring."
Unless you're willing to provide your identity, all of your 'credentials' can be interpreted as being pretentious or a conspicuous show, as of wealth or importance, and a display intended to impress others. I am not impressed by it because I have Ph.D. in recognizing unverified and complete bullsh*t. Anyone can manufacture it. Again, this is a level playing field and everyone has something to contribute.
I get it. You have a Ph.D. in calling names. And you want to engage in violating the rule of "Bad Behavior," by demanding I reveal my identity. My credentials are true credentials. Your reaction is to assume I am lying, instead of taking me seriously. I have also written over 400 technical memoranda in my career and nearly a like number of formal internal documents. My point being that I know how to communicate technical concepts, and I have read a lifetime's worth of popular science articles. Some are good, others are flash. In that quote, I point out that the artist's illustration was figurative, not literal, and that some readers were taking it literally. Part of what goes along with a technical career is a very good ability to discriminate bullshit. And all I can see from you is no Ph.D. to name, and simple hostility. In order to get, you have to give, and you have scuttled off like a cuttlefish in a cloud of ink.
You misinterpreted what I wrote. You precede yourself... I demanded nothing from you. I said your writings seem pretentious. And that to me should raise a red-flag to anyone. IMHO, I just don't believe your rhetoric. You know as well as I, the only way you can prove your lofty vitae curriculum is by identifying yourself. This is why I wrote that any curriculum vitae is worthless without a name. I don't expect you to ever prove it though, nor do I expect it. Therefore, no demand. Thus, the credential bloviating is non-sequitur and has no verifiable purpose. Be meek and humble to your fellow person:
But He gives a greater grace. Therefore it says, “God is opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble.” -- James 4:6
I pretend nothing, so what seems to you "pretentious" is from your own bias filter. I share what I know, and you can think what you want, but what I share is factual. It is interesting to me that you don't believe what you can never disprove. (Not that one should, but it seems to prove no problem for many on this board.) The problem I see is that you are focusing on the messenger, but not the message.
"A wicked messenger falls into adversity. But a faithful envoy brings healing." -- Proverbs 13:17
You may have posted it, but posting is no credential of truth. The support of a Jewish homeland is not connected to Jews? (I didn't say anything about the proponents of Zionism). The connection to Satanism is interesting, if true, but how do you make that argument? I can't help but wonder what you make of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I like it when people present their credentials. It confers the respect due to reality. If I may ask, what is your Ph.D. in? Are there particular topics where we agree? Or disagree?
The State of Israel was created by the Rothschilds and this is very evident in Israel with all the commemorations and landmarks there of the Rothschilds. There are other Jewish homelands that are "connected" to the Jews like Birobidzhan and earlier, the Pale of Settlement.. However, Israel is different and doesn't represent the will of its people. In fact, Israel is somewhat of a privately owned nation.....Think of the Hawaiian island of Lanai which is 98% owned by Larry Ellison, co-founder and chairman of Oracle Corporation. Yet, there is over 3,367 people that live there. This type of scenario is at the very foundation of Israel and its dictates ultimately come from the Rothschilds.
The Ph.D. I'm referring to is one with a detail thesis for recognizing bullsh!t artists like yourself. You know, those that like to readily "present their credentials". Just as Ugly People Are More Likely To Continue Wearing COVID Masks, bulls!t artists tout 'credentials' to seemingly con people. Every curriculum vitae starts with an identity. Without it, its all horse crap. Without revealing identities, it makes GAW a level playing field. Touting one's putative 'credentials' demonstrates a proclivity for showing pretentiousness and recognizable chutzpah. Let's look at your claimed "credentials". You wrote:
Here is some more of your ostentation.
Unless you're willing to provide your identity, all of your 'credentials' can be interpreted as being pretentious or a conspicuous show, as of wealth or importance, and a display intended to impress others. I am not impressed by it because I have Ph.D. in recognizing unverified and complete bullsh*t. Anyone can manufacture it. Again, this is a level playing field and everyone has something to contribute.
I get it. You have a Ph.D. in calling names. And you want to engage in violating the rule of "Bad Behavior," by demanding I reveal my identity. My credentials are true credentials. Your reaction is to assume I am lying, instead of taking me seriously. I have also written over 400 technical memoranda in my career and nearly a like number of formal internal documents. My point being that I know how to communicate technical concepts, and I have read a lifetime's worth of popular science articles. Some are good, others are flash. In that quote, I point out that the artist's illustration was figurative, not literal, and that some readers were taking it literally. Part of what goes along with a technical career is a very good ability to discriminate bullshit. And all I can see from you is no Ph.D. to name, and simple hostility. In order to get, you have to give, and you have scuttled off like a cuttlefish in a cloud of ink.
You misinterpreted what I wrote. You precede yourself... I demanded nothing from you. I said your writings seem pretentious. And that to me should raise a red-flag to anyone. IMHO, I just don't believe your rhetoric. You know as well as I, the only way you can prove your lofty vitae curriculum is by identifying yourself. This is why I wrote that any curriculum vitae is worthless without a name. I don't expect you to ever prove it though, nor do I expect it. Therefore, no demand. Thus, the credential bloviating is non-sequitur and has no verifiable purpose. Be meek and humble to your fellow person:
But He gives a greater grace. Therefore it says, “God is opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble.” -- James 4:6
I pretend nothing, so what seems to you "pretentious" is from your own bias filter. I share what I know, and you can think what you want, but what I share is factual. It is interesting to me that you don't believe what you can never disprove. (Not that one should, but it seems to prove no problem for many on this board.) The problem I see is that you are focusing on the messenger, but not the message.
"A wicked messenger falls into adversity. But a faithful envoy brings healing." -- Proverbs 13:17