Good points. I hear you. I am doing the information analysing, but rather than looking for people to believe in, it’s more about people to trust. The veracity and provenance of the information is wound up with the motives and characters of the messengers, whether I like it or not. Either they are good people trying to achieve good ends amid a maelstrom of chaos and ambiguity, or they are dark triads doing it all for shits, giggles and kicks.
Science is zero-trust. We have been brainwashed over the decades into "trusting the experts", but science is a process of learning knowledge that does not depend on the people, but only about process.
No one ever needs to trust Steve Kirsch or Malone. All we need to do is verify their claims. If its based on data, verify the data for yourself. If its based on analysis, do your own analysis and verify. If its based on proprietary information only they have access to, then withhold your judgement and push for public release of that proprietary information.
Everything else about these people is irrelevant.
When I hear talk about "Chaos agent" etc, what I am really hearing is that the people who have been cosy in the captured scientific system are starting to panic that they can no longer control narratives.
Just came across this which is turning into a rabbit hole for me albeit one where I am endeavouring, to your point, to stay focused on messages (“the science™️”) not messengers (“heroes”). Charles Wright is going in hard lately on Kirsch for alleged Remdesevir harm coverups. Interestingly, Crawford posts a comment on this article stating he “resigned in protest” from Kirsch’s steering committee.
This is how my Anon brain works - This is exactly like what they did with Trump's taxes and companies etc. Keep digging and digging and digging until you find one thing you can attack (witchhunt).
Whatever is explained in this article seems to be highly technical, might not even be anything nefarious unless they can prove this particular study was used as a basis for pushing Remdesivir (and we know thats not true because Fauci famously quoted the study), and the only reason anyone would even hone on it is if this was a witchhunt.
I will hold my judgement, but this only bolsters my belief that Steve Kirsch is shaking the very foundations of the cosy scientific fraud.
Good points. I hear you. I am doing the information analysing, but rather than looking for people to believe in, it’s more about people to trust. The veracity and provenance of the information is wound up with the motives and characters of the messengers, whether I like it or not. Either they are good people trying to achieve good ends amid a maelstrom of chaos and ambiguity, or they are dark triads doing it all for shits, giggles and kicks.
Science is zero-trust. We have been brainwashed over the decades into "trusting the experts", but science is a process of learning knowledge that does not depend on the people, but only about process.
No one ever needs to trust Steve Kirsch or Malone. All we need to do is verify their claims. If its based on data, verify the data for yourself. If its based on analysis, do your own analysis and verify. If its based on proprietary information only they have access to, then withhold your judgement and push for public release of that proprietary information.
Everything else about these people is irrelevant.
When I hear talk about "Chaos agent" etc, what I am really hearing is that the people who have been cosy in the captured scientific system are starting to panic that they can no longer control narratives.
“Run Kirsch is near…”
Just came across this which is turning into a rabbit hole for me albeit one where I am endeavouring, to your point, to stay focused on messages (“the science™️”) not messengers (“heroes”). Charles Wright is going in hard lately on Kirsch for alleged Remdesevir harm coverups. Interestingly, Crawford posts a comment on this article stating he “resigned in protest” from Kirsch’s steering committee.
https://open.substack.com/pub/charleswright1/p/run-kirsch-is-near-another-cetf-funded?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
This is how my Anon brain works - This is exactly like what they did with Trump's taxes and companies etc. Keep digging and digging and digging until you find one thing you can attack (witchhunt).
Whatever is explained in this article seems to be highly technical, might not even be anything nefarious unless they can prove this particular study was used as a basis for pushing Remdesivir (and we know thats not true because Fauci famously quoted the study), and the only reason anyone would even hone on it is if this was a witchhunt.
I will hold my judgement, but this only bolsters my belief that Steve Kirsch is shaking the very foundations of the cosy scientific fraud.