Former US Attorney Testifies to House Judiciary Committee That He Had Enough Evidence to Open Up Formal Investigation into the Bidens' Bribery Schemes, But Was Blocked by All of Biden's Political Appointees - The Great Awakening

Former US Attorney Testifies to House Judiciary Committee That He Had Enough Evidence to Open Up Formal Investigation into the Bidens' Bribery Schemes, But Was Blocked by All of Biden's Political Appointees (justthenews.com) 🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸

posted 1 year ago by PowderRoomPolitics 1 year ago by PowderRoomPolitics +239 / -0

Prosecutor says Biden bribery claim was credible enough for further investigation, but FBI resisted

Former U.S. Attorney Scott Brady told the House Judiciary Committee the FBI kept even the mere existence of the Hunter Biden laptop from his probe.

9 comments

9 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (9)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– WhyAserverWasBuilt 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Ya think?

When John Kerry took down BCCI the money laundering operation in the Caymans, they moved it all to Delaware close to home and made Joe Biden their mafioso bag man. That's why they would install him instead of Trump.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– MAG768720 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Seems like that is what the Ukrainian bank was about, as well. Ukrainian bank and Ukrainian gas company both owned by the same guy, who bribed Hunter/Joe to get Ukrainian prosecutor off his back.

You know Joe didn't grant that favor without strings attached.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q