You can hurt children in ways not sexual. It's a Gentile terminology. And appropriate to the time and place. No need to get any more blatant. These are honest words. Remember one doesn't need to be harsh in wording to get the audience to understand what's being said. It's a well used term. People know what it means.
Well I was thinking maybe he was worried about kids listening in to his talk.... was a reason for choosing those words... it's just too soft, like there was consent.... like calling trafficked kids, 'underage prostitutes'....
Wow. Sleeping with children. Who in Washinton DC has been doing that?
the majority
majority? you think so. Its that bad?
Yes
Who hasn’t. That’s an easier question. And not much sleeping is going in. Look into the Franklin scandal.
Why use the term "sleeping with"? Why not simply "hurting children"?
Words matter, if you're trying to make someone understand a difficult truth you have to use honest words.
I agree. How about molestation and/or sexual abuse.
I'm really sick and tired of pansy mamby pamby mealy mouth BS.
Maybe that is why I have very few friends, and why my wife left me.
Nurses are trained that when delivering bad new to a family member to be clear in their wording... no 'they passed', 'they are gone',
Be clear and specific so there is no room for misunderstanding and more heartache,
Being clear is compassionate "They died"
You can hurt children in ways not sexual. It's a Gentile terminology. And appropriate to the time and place. No need to get any more blatant. These are honest words. Remember one doesn't need to be harsh in wording to get the audience to understand what's being said. It's a well used term. People know what it means.
Well I was thinking maybe he was worried about kids listening in to his talk.... was a reason for choosing those words... it's just too soft, like there was consent.... like calling trafficked kids, 'underage prostitutes'....