Well my experience (so far) has been different. I'm the Sunday school teacher for the adults at our church. Started about 2.5 years ago. Took the class thru the entire book of Romans. I had fun with "all Israel will be saved"! Now I'm teaching a series (verse by verse) on the book of Acts. Got to Acts 2:19-20 - I put up a number of commentaries that stated that "this great and notable day of the Lord" was referring to the destruction of Jerusalem & the Temple in AD 70. At the end of the lesson the Pastor told the class that interpretation was "preterism". Well that opened the door I can tell you. I just flat out told him "that's the way I see it after 15 years of study and that's the way I have to teach it". His response was "take your liberty". He also said "our church organization needs a symposium on dispensationalism". So I am encouraged. I did an entire write up/commentary on Matthew chapter 24 and sent it to him. His response: "we need to talk about this over lunch". Anyway I'm at the point that I'm not going to hide what I believe and I don't have to teach. I'll either sit down or walk away. I'm 71 years old! www.scripturerevealed.com
well apparently the church constitution did mention dispensationalism, not as one of the "core doctrines" or whatever that you need to be a member, but as one of the side things that the church believes. so once it came out the pastor didnt believe it anymore there were months of meetings deciding whether to kick him out or modify the church charter. in the end he was forced out and then the people who forced him out left anyway. and the new pastor was an absolute charlatan.
Well it's about the same with my church organization. If you don't adhere to dispensationalism you can't hold a license (as of 2005). I was asked to obtain a license but I declined because I knew I couldn't agree to all of the organization's guidelines.
i dont really see the big deal about it tbh. i probably believed in it when I was younger, dont agree with it now, and dont really think it's important enough to argue over.
I see preterism as a vast exegetical improvement over the unbiblical dispensationalism, but it still has some very weak points imho. The historic Church has clearly always favored what is now called Amillennialism (a misnomer of a term), because it is clearly derived from all the biblical texts taken together. These three lectures deal with Revelation and the millennium quite thoroughly:
Thanks I'll check those sources out. I really do believe that dispensationalism as a belief system will come to an end once the modern nation of Israel does not line up with that belief system......
Well my experience (so far) has been different. I'm the Sunday school teacher for the adults at our church. Started about 2.5 years ago. Took the class thru the entire book of Romans. I had fun with "all Israel will be saved"! Now I'm teaching a series (verse by verse) on the book of Acts. Got to Acts 2:19-20 - I put up a number of commentaries that stated that "this great and notable day of the Lord" was referring to the destruction of Jerusalem & the Temple in AD 70. At the end of the lesson the Pastor told the class that interpretation was "preterism". Well that opened the door I can tell you. I just flat out told him "that's the way I see it after 15 years of study and that's the way I have to teach it". His response was "take your liberty". He also said "our church organization needs a symposium on dispensationalism". So I am encouraged. I did an entire write up/commentary on Matthew chapter 24 and sent it to him. His response: "we need to talk about this over lunch". Anyway I'm at the point that I'm not going to hide what I believe and I don't have to teach. I'll either sit down or walk away. I'm 71 years old! www.scripturerevealed.com
well apparently the church constitution did mention dispensationalism, not as one of the "core doctrines" or whatever that you need to be a member, but as one of the side things that the church believes. so once it came out the pastor didnt believe it anymore there were months of meetings deciding whether to kick him out or modify the church charter. in the end he was forced out and then the people who forced him out left anyway. and the new pastor was an absolute charlatan.
Well it's about the same with my church organization. If you don't adhere to dispensationalism you can't hold a license (as of 2005). I was asked to obtain a license but I declined because I knew I couldn't agree to all of the organization's guidelines.
i dont really see the big deal about it tbh. i probably believed in it when I was younger, dont agree with it now, and dont really think it's important enough to argue over.
I see preterism as a vast exegetical improvement over the unbiblical dispensationalism, but it still has some very weak points imho. The historic Church has clearly always favored what is now called Amillennialism (a misnomer of a term), because it is clearly derived from all the biblical texts taken together. These three lectures deal with Revelation and the millennium quite thoroughly:
http://links.christreformed.org/irons/20211212-The-Millennial-Question.mp3
http://links.christreformed.org/irons/20211226-Interpreting-The-Millennium.mp3
http://links.christreformed.org/irons/20220102-Interpreting-The-Book-Of-Revelation.mp3
Thanks I'll check those sources out. I really do believe that dispensationalism as a belief system will come to an end once the modern nation of Israel does not line up with that belief system......