Britain Agrees to Relinquish its Tax Sovereignty to the WEF
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 MOTHER WEFFERS! 🌎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
Did you read the citation from that website? It points directly to The Telegraph reporting from the UK. Yes, it is mainstream media, but the story is still a part of the global narrative.
This post was intended to serve as a place to discuss this narrative, nothing more.
Do not jump to conclusions regarding ill intent with stickied posts. Sometimes the purpose of a sticky is to gain perspective on possible narratives coming down the pipeline, and to dig into these topics.
Thank you Qanaut. I hope you know that I have the greatest respect for your activities are GAW. Nevertheless....
Although I did not do a comprehensive read of the citation, I'm quite aware of the technique this website uses to mislead and insert disinformation.
The telegraph article appears to be outlining the issues in relation to the OECD ((Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).
While its reasonable to think that OECD is part of the monolithic efforts by the Cabal to undermine national sovereignty and build the NWO (they have hundreds of such projects and organizations), the assertions by TPV seem quite fake. At least, they provide zero basis for them in their article.
This is equivalent to offering someone a chocolate cake, where the cake as a whole is edible, but the chocolate icing on the outside - only 5% of the cake - is actually made from excrement. But if you can convince the diner that its a real chocolate cake, they'll eat the excrement!
How is the OECD for example, connected to the WEF such that Britain is relinquishing its tax sovereignty to the WEF? There's no mention of this in the Telegraph article.
There is no mention of Davos in the article, despite TPVs assertion that "unelected bureaucrats headquartered in Davos will be in charge of collecting tax from British subjects".
There is no mention of any factual basis for the assertion that the "WEF-run OECD" is in fact run by the World Economic Forum.
I did not leap to any conclusion or even think there was ill intent in stickying the post. What I do think is that there is lack of attention to evidence, and to the negative impacts that TPV and such sites have on our mission and our people.
I understand the idea of stickying a post in order to stimulate discussion on all sorts of topics, including discussion of possible narratives, and that stickies are not necessarily endorsements, etc.
But I have to question why the actual article by the Telegraph, which has zero mention of WEF and makes no such assertions, was not chosen for the posting. Posting that would seem highly productive to me.
My research shows that TPV is very consistent in what they do. They fabricate headlines and follow them up with two or three similarly fabricated or baseless assertions, and THEN copy/paste seemingly related articles by others, or a written article siting tenuously related factual information, that gives the veneer of legitimacy to their fabricate clickbait headlines.
Despite the mainstream telegraph article actually containing what we might consider notable or noteworthy information, the headlines the majority of readers are attaching to seems to be the fake triggering WEF assertions.
Are these points not worth considering?
Anyway, that's my view. Imo, these topics can very well be discussed, raised and stickied without promoting the fake and false narratives that TPV inserts in to the truth sphere.
Conversely, I think that the posting of TPV content, which INVARIABLY includes (is always highlighted by) that 5% excrement, does a significant disservice to the board. At least in the form it takes 97% of the time, that is, without any indication to readers that the content is fake and finds no tangible basis in the actual article.
Thankfully, the number of GAW members who are aware of this situation does seem to be increasing. But the negative impacts are still there, also, imo.
I think you are focusing on the pedantic. Even you admit:
I think we are all smart enough to here to understand the intent of the article, and to the artistic license taken by some of these outlets. By calling attention to it, you only magnify the issue. The point is, there is never going to be any direct evidence that the WEF and the OECD are controlled by the same globalist cabal, but most of here already understand this is the case.
It seems you are choosing this article to air your personal grievances against TPV. I get it. You don't like them. But you are stretching the truth if you think that this article is the problem. In this world of misinformation and propaganda, we are all capable of understanding the shades of meaning. If you are going to demand journalistic integrity...well, that left the building long ago.
Thanks for sharing your view.
Have you dug into who TPV aka NewsPunch aka Your News Wire is, or have you read any of my research on this?
Any serious investigation shows very clearly that this is a clickbait and disinfo operation, who often lead with the most insane and ungrounded headlines. The ultra liberal gay couple that run this site, do you seriously think they have any other motive except clickbait? It's overt.
"artistic license" - That's like saying Fox News used artistic license when they called the election for Biden way, way ahead of the actual result.
There is a lot of damage done and direct negative consequences from this and other clickbait / disinfo operations.
I can see how in isolation, this post here might lend itself to your view that TPV lies are innocuous, but serious research and investigation show different. They hurt the awakening movement far more than the MSM, who most of us are awake to.
People seem to forget Trump's snake story kek. TPV/NewsPunch/YourNewsWire = snake, and our humble forum = the house.
I don't want anything to do with these fuckfaces and their stupid fucking larp / bait website.