The link opens up a search of GreatAwakening.win with the search item "Clickbait", many of which are posts I have posted about ThePeople'sVoice aka NewsPunch aka YourNewsWire.
The posts cover the origins (creators), the methodology they use, with case study examples, discussion of the impacts, etc.
I can see that this current post was poorly designed. Very likely I'll remove it and structure a better, clearer post that lays out my intent and concerns better.
If you are complaining about posts with "clickbait" in title (thats the only explanation I can come up with, based on this post with no info) - we all appreciate people posting outrageous sounding info by telling us its potentially clickbait, and letting people do what they want with that info.
Eh, no. I was using the link to bring up the multitude of posts about Clickbait, Many of which are (my) posts about:
ThePeople'sVoice aka NewsPunch aka YourNewsWire.
The posts cover the origins (creators) of this site, the methodologies they use, with case study examples, discussion of the impacts, etc.
If I'm complaining, its about people who post clickbait from this site, WITHOUT any attention to practices of verification, evaluation, etc, and about the negative impacts that (in my opinion) this sort of posting has.
I supposed it would have been obvious, but clearly I haven't designed this post well, as no one seems to have gotten the point.
In any case, I was very surprised when two clickbait articles from TPV were AGAIN posted at GAW, and one of them stickied and posted by a mod! When there is clearly no tangible basis (that I can see) for the sensationalist clickbait premise of the articles.
Considering that very often between 50% and 80% of reactions by the board to such clickbait items is purely reactive and in almost all cases based on fabrications (i.e. reacting and responding to things that never happened), I see such posting as a significant disservice to the GAW board and community, particularly as it seems to promote the opposite of what Q exhorted everyone to do; to research, find out the factual data, discern and explode fake narratives while revealing truth.
Oh, if folks actually posted stuff with "clickbait' in the title, I'd be super happy. So no, I'm certainly not complaining about posts with "clickbait" in the title. Quite the opposite.
Good points, and thanks again for tirelessly educating people about this.
I might have mentioned to you before or to other Anons, the best way you can serve the community is to put a brief reply to the post in question, and to deport the post so mods can take a whack at this.
I am not able to find any stickied post currently that is from the people's voice. You can always deport them, so we know which one you are talking about.
What exactly are you referring to, and what makes you say this... there are shills, that is obvious but be more specific.
Perhaps posting is unclear. I'll rethink it. But for now...
Click on link (title).
Link leads nowhere.
The link opens up a search of GreatAwakening.win with the search item "Clickbait", many of which are posts I have posted about ThePeople'sVoice aka NewsPunch aka YourNewsWire.
The posts cover the origins (creators), the methodology they use, with case study examples, discussion of the impacts, etc.
I can see that this current post was poorly designed. Very likely I'll remove it and structure a better, clearer post that lays out my intent and concerns better.
Thanks for the feedback, btw.
dead link....
Even anons have differing levels of intelligence and discernment.
If you are complaining about posts with "clickbait" in title (thats the only explanation I can come up with, based on this post with no info) - we all appreciate people posting outrageous sounding info by telling us its potentially clickbait, and letting people do what they want with that info.
Eh, no. I was using the link to bring up the multitude of posts about Clickbait, Many of which are (my) posts about:
ThePeople'sVoice aka NewsPunch aka YourNewsWire.
The posts cover the origins (creators) of this site, the methodologies they use, with case study examples, discussion of the impacts, etc.
If I'm complaining, its about people who post clickbait from this site, WITHOUT any attention to practices of verification, evaluation, etc, and about the negative impacts that (in my opinion) this sort of posting has.
I supposed it would have been obvious, but clearly I haven't designed this post well, as no one seems to have gotten the point.
In any case, I was very surprised when two clickbait articles from TPV were AGAIN posted at GAW, and one of them stickied and posted by a mod! When there is clearly no tangible basis (that I can see) for the sensationalist clickbait premise of the articles.
Considering that very often between 50% and 80% of reactions by the board to such clickbait items is purely reactive and in almost all cases based on fabrications (i.e. reacting and responding to things that never happened), I see such posting as a significant disservice to the GAW board and community, particularly as it seems to promote the opposite of what Q exhorted everyone to do; to research, find out the factual data, discern and explode fake narratives while revealing truth.
Oh, if folks actually posted stuff with "clickbait' in the title, I'd be super happy. So no, I'm certainly not complaining about posts with "clickbait" in the title. Quite the opposite.
Good points, and thanks again for tirelessly educating people about this.
I might have mentioned to you before or to other Anons, the best way you can serve the community is to put a brief reply to the post in question, and to deport the post so mods can take a whack at this.
I am not able to find any stickied post currently that is from the people's voice. You can always deport them, so we know which one you are talking about.
Thanks Anon!
Thank you Mod.
I appreciate the advice.
Not.