No, you just don't get it! Kentucky has had 9 Republican governors in its history and 34 Democrat governors, they must have cheated to get a Democrat governor!
Sarcasm aside, people here are making a few decent points in favor of there being fraud. Certainly enough as a starting point for a deeper investigation based on what we learned from 2020.
But all the dogmatic downvotes for anyone presenting the very real possibility of split ticket voters are completely absurd.
Sure, investigation is fine, but I'm hardly seeing any actual proof of fraud here. Like, how can we tell the difference between fraud and when we genuinely lose an election? Every election will have peculiarities, but that doesn't nessesarily mean fraud.
To add, we also can't just demand investigations for every election we lose or people will just think we're the boy who cried wolf; and we likely would be.
We have to find the right balance of evidence to call for an investigation and to call an outcome fraudulent. Too little and no one will listen. But if the amount of evidence people want before investigating is too much, we won't be able to muster up enough evidence without an investigation, which would leave us stuck.
No, you just don't get it! Kentucky has had 9 Republican governors in its history and 34 Democrat governors, they must have cheated to get a Democrat governor!
Sarcasm aside, people here are making a few decent points in favor of there being fraud. Certainly enough as a starting point for a deeper investigation based on what we learned from 2020.
But all the dogmatic downvotes for anyone presenting the very real possibility of split ticket voters are completely absurd.
Sure, investigation is fine, but I'm hardly seeing any actual proof of fraud here. Like, how can we tell the difference between fraud and when we genuinely lose an election? Every election will have peculiarities, but that doesn't nessesarily mean fraud.
Certainly.
To add, we also can't just demand investigations for every election we lose or people will just think we're the boy who cried wolf; and we likely would be.
We have to find the right balance of evidence to call for an investigation and to call an outcome fraudulent. Too little and no one will listen. But if the amount of evidence people want before investigating is too much, we won't be able to muster up enough evidence without an investigation, which would leave us stuck.