Has anyone else taken note on Tucker 2.0? When I recently speaking to a group of citizens in Ukraine, I was surprised by his demeanor and suggested he came across as Presidential. As more time passes, I believe we can see more signs that he is indeed being prepared for greater things, and he has the support of the White Hats.
-
Leaving Fox News in a divisive way: Face it. Many people, including you or I, would not trust Carlson if he remained with FoxNews.
-
New MAGA stances: Tucker always spoke conservative rhetoric, but it was not much different from that of Sean Hannity. Now he is taking strong stances that fly in the interest of Fox News and the establishment, but align exactly with the America First Stance.
-
New Demeanor of Gravitas. Tucker has always been very articulate and clear. But if you watch him in some of his new appearances, you will see he is projecting a new image. He is evolving from being an inquisitive journalist with a skeptical face to a voice of authority.
-
Sudden prominent placing: The recent interview with DJT received over 100 million views within a day. DJT could have have chosen anyone to do this interview but he chose Tucker. This this week, Tucker also made a celeb appearance along with DJT and Kid Rock at the popular Ultimate Fighting Challenge.
-
International interviews: Lack of International experience is often something used at presidential debates. Almost as soon as Tucker's new X show took off, he began international leaders including the leaders of Hungary, Brazil, El Salvador, Argentina, and he is reportedly getting ready for an interview with Putin himself.
-
Donald Trump name drop: Donald Trump just said he would consider Tucker Carlson as his VP because he has common sense. I think that may have been a trial balloon to see how this would have been received, and also to give the public enough time to start looking at Carlson in a new way.
So I think Tucker could be looked as one to carry the torch after Donald Trump. Your thoughts?
Edit: many people are saying Press Secretary. I think this is way below Tucker and it would require no priming for. Look at the various Press Secretaries that have been put into place without any fanfare. FoxNew Tucker would be a fit for Press Secretary, but I really think they're positioning him for something much bigger.
Like the guy, but I don't see how he would be qualified.
That sounds an awful lot like what leftists and RINOs said about Trump, just saying.
Running the type of businesses that Trump has and his business background are some of the reasons why I thought he was qualified. Tucker has nothing in his background that would make me feel comfortable with running a business, state, or country. Choosing someone on feels and emotion seems rather leftist to me.
But that's why you get him in the VP role. The VP doesn't run anything except special projects. It's a training program.
What you deem as qualifications is different than what others deem as qualifications; Tucker is very good at speech, very articulate and sticks to what he says whether it is specifically popular or not.
The VP position thrives on someone who can perform in this role, because their executive authority is much less than the Presidency. This is valuable for acting as an envoy for the President and ensuring that he gets done what the President needs to be done. Pence was suitable in this role too for the same reason, but instead Pence was duplicitous and demonstrably working behind the scenes and lacking the morality we need from a partner to Trump.
Additionally, making the assumption that it is an emotional choice is silly; I would personally choose Ben Carson for that choice.
Certainly don't agree with Flynn as a choice.
Lastly, and just like with Trump: there is no Constitutional requirement for President or Vice President to be specifically and arbitrarily "qualified". Choosing what qualifies them and deeming them unqualified is an emotional response to begin with, as that is the exact response the left tried to use. They deemed his business portfolio as not sufficiently qualified. Just because you or I would disagree doesn't make those qualifications actually relevant.
What exactly are your qualifications for the VP of the USA? How does the current VP and past VPs measure up?