I've tried to understand everything I can about Lyme, and other diseases...and I've come up with a disturbing conclusion. I may not know a lot about Borrelia burgdorferi, other than what I can read, but I know quite a bit about insects and arachnids.

The narrative tells us that the ticks first bite an infected animal, then transfer the infection to another host by biting them. But this is contrary to how ticks feed, reproduce, and die! First, Borrelia burgdorferi is not a commonly-found pathogen. Secondly, ticks DON'T BITE multiple hosts! In fact, very few ticks ever find a host...they die waiting on the end of a blade of grass or twig waiting for a host that never comes close enough for them to grab. They are born without any infection, and can only theoretically obtain an infection by feeding on an infected host. That means, any existing regional infection would quickly disappear without a means of transfer between hosts.

So what is the real life history of a tick like? The females mate if they're lucky, find a SINGLE HOST, bury themselves into the skin/hide, feed over several days until they are almost to the point of bursting (unless the host is lucky and scratches them off), then they drop off and lay eggs. This is not conducive to the expansion of a dangerous infection...in fact...any infection would be eradicated quickly if this is the only mode of transfer and spread.

My conclusion? Lyme disease is being augmented annually by a dark project from the CIA, dropping lab-infected ticks from a plane like they were originally designed and tested. If you think about it, this is the only logical explanation.