I believe the "Protestant" Reformation was simply an operation by the Secret Societies to break up Christiandom.
▪️In the 14th century, The Holy Roman Catholic King Phillip put down the Knights Templars (who also were infiltrated by Gnostics). The Templars are the 14th Century Precursor to Freemasonry. FACT.
▪️in the 15th century, the Spanish Inquisition put down the Lumbrosos "Illumaniti" in Spain.
▪️by this point, in the late 15th Centtury, Epstien like Child sacrifice was Occuring in certain Jewish Sects & the Church put them down as well. Please researh the following child saints & tell me
This shit doesnt sound like Epstein:
-Saint Simon of Trent.
-Saint William of Norwich.
-Holy Child of Lagardia. (This sacrifice got Jews
Kicked out of Spain in 1492).
By the time Luther came into the picture, the church had already beem at war with Witches, Child Sacrifices, Secret societies... you think this war against Satanic forces is new? The Catholic Church has at least a 700 year, track record of fighting THIS!
Look up the Seal of Martin Luther.➡️
Then Look up the Seal of the Tutors.➡️
Finally, look at the seal for the Rose+Cross. Rosecrutian Secret Society. ➡️
The Protestant movement was begun by THESE secret societies. Stop being tricked into hating the ORIGINAL Church founded by Jesus & the Apostles.
Thanks for the interesting links. Could you please provide further perspective on the long history of pedophilic priests and how to effectively discern good Catholics from bad ones? And what about the vast wealth controlled by the Vatican milked for centuries from continents like South America--is this for good or evil? What about Pope Francis, white or black hat?
I dont trust Burgolio but I was oddly surpised when he recentlh denounced Freemasonry.
I am looking to Arch Bishop Vigano & a few other conservative Spritual leaders for guidance during these confusing times.
In light of Kamala Harris Knights Templar Masonic Police force being exposed in 2015, I believe that this concorted war on the Church goes back to the French Revolution. Look at Mason General Lafayette's gift to Mason General Washington; the Keys to the Bastielle proudly hanging in his house.
I believe our job, as laymen, is to expose the 300 year long plot against the Church by the (G)nistic Secret Societies against the Church.
Re-read the Q drop, referencing the letter that archbishop wrote to President Trump back in 2020 and President Trump retweeted it in that letter, vegan no calls out the freemasons, and it specifically says 'Solvay coagula' the words written on Baphomet, the Templars (Freemason gnostic 5th Collumn) secretly worships. The infiltration & war on Christiandom can be whitnessed in the late 14th century.
Dude, I am with you on your skepticism! I dont trust any "Pope" since the 1960's!!!
I dont believe that any pope since Pius XII is legit.
Vatican II was a coup (read into what Vigano writes about it.)
If we actually had a Holy Pope, he would excommunicate Pelosi, Biden, Trudeau, & the slew of other fakes thats say they are "Catholic".
If we had a Holy Pope, he would destroy that Satanic Snake Building that was built in the late 1960's.
I understand your misgivings but please understand.... the FBI is targetting traditional catholics like myself & not the modernist, Novos Ordo (New Order) Catholics. There is a reason for that....
The RCC is not the original church founded by Jesus and the Apostles, the RCC came into being because Roman Emperor Constantine declared Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire. The first “pope” was established in 606 or 608. The RCC has doctrines and traditions that directly go against the word of God. The Bible doesn’t teach that Mary was a perpetual virgin, she wasn’t sinless, she had to make sacrifices to atone for her sin, nowhere in scripture does it tell us to pray to Mary, she is not a co-redeemer with Christ. The Bible makes it clear we have ONE Mediator between God and man and that’s Jesus Christ alone, not priests. There’s nowhere in scripture that allow for indulgences, anointing a pope and declaring him infallible, praying to saints, etc. I could go on but there’s no need. The word of God is the final authority, not a man made religion.
Your entire comment is full of crap but that is factually wrong.
The Papacy goes back to Peter according to the RCC. Even if you believe that Constantine was the founder, he lived 200 years before you claim the Papacy was created. Total nonsense.
The papacy is a man made belief and it flies in the face of God and His word. I don’t believe Constantine is the founder of the RCC, he declared Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire. Christ is and always has been the head of the church, He has supreme authority over it, not a man that is called the pope, who the RCC claims is infallible. That would disqualify Peter as even he is rebuked by Paul “during his papacy”. You do Peter a great injustice when you attribute him to being the first pope, he would quickly denounce that title. Instead of focusing on what your church says is true, why don’t you actually read the Bible, which has the final authority as it was written by God.
You're wrong again about basically everything in this reply.
"The papacy is a man made belief and it flies in the face of God and His word"
No, it doesn't. The papacy is just the bishop of Rome. Bishops are in God's Word. Peter's role as the earthly head of the church is explicitly described in Matthew 16:18. Straight from the mouth of Jesus Christ.
Constantine didn't "declare Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire", he only granted it legal status. Theodosius I was the one who made it the official religion, DECADES after Constantine's death.
"Christ is and always has been the head of the church"
Yeah, this isn't something any Catholic will disagree with. The pope is only its earthly leader.
"the RCC claims is infallible"
No, it doesn't. You're misrepresenting the concept of papal infallibility, which ONLY applies when the pope is speaking "ex cathedra" which happened like ONCE in 2000 years. Try again.
"That would disqualify Peter as even he is rebuked by Paul “during his papacy”."
No, it wouldn't. You need to study the NT if you don't realize that Peter clearly had authority over all other apostles. That aside, there have been countless examples of popes being corrected throughout history. Take a note from the original 1582 Douay Rheims Catholic Bible on this topic:
"And who is so dull that can not see, that the inferiour, though not by office and iurisdiction, yet by the law of brotherly loue and fraternal correption, may reprehend his superiour? Did euer any man wonder that a good Priest or any vertuous person should tel the Pope, or any other great Prelate, or greatest Prince in earth, their faults? Popes may be reprehended, & are iustly admonished of their faults, & ought to take it in good part, and so they doe & euer haue done, when it commeth of zeale & loue, as of S. Paul, Irenæus, Cyprian, Hierom, Augustin, Bernard: But of Simon Magus, Nouatus, Iulian, Wiclefe, Luther, Caluin, Beza, that doe it of malice, & raile no lesse at their vertues then their vices, of such (I say) God's Prelates must not be taught nor corrected, though they must patiently take it, as our Sauiour did the like reproches of the malitious Iewes; and as Dauid did the malediction of Semel. 2. Reg. 16."
"You do Peter a great injustice when you attribute him to being the first pope, he would quickly denounce that title"
Wrong. As stated earlier, the official title of the papacy is "bishop of Rome". "Pope" is basically just Italian slang for "papa". It's a term of respect, and the concept of the apostles referring to themselves as spiritual fathers can be found in the Old and New Testaments. Peter himself even refers to himself as Mark's "father" (1 Peter 5:13).
"Instead of focusing on what your church says is true, why don’t you actually read the Bible, which has the final authority as it was written by God."
Instead of making baseless assumptions about me and the RCC, how about you actually learn what you're talking about instead of repeating centuries-old, debunked talking points?
So you just chose to believe that Christianity went underground for 1,500 until a perverted German Gnostic "Catholic" Priest, broke his vows, married a Nun & decided to edit the Bible? Is that really what Protestants believe?
You believe there are 40,000 different Protestant ways instead of the ONE & ORIGINAL Apostolic Church?
You know that the Holy Roman Catholic Church has been fighting Satanic Epstein Child Killers since the MidEavil ages, correct? You know
The RCC has been at war with Satanic Freemasons since the French Revolution, correct?
Look up Saint Simon of Trent. Look up Saint William of Norwich, Look up the Holy Child of Largadia & educate youself on how REAL Christian society handled the Synagogue of Satan.
There's a Reason Q came online 500 years to the date of the "Reformation". There is a reason Q mentions Vigano.
There's a reason POTUS retweeted Vigano's letter to Potus back in 2020. EDUCATE YOURSELF.
I noticed you chose not to address anything I said about the obvious beliefs of the RCC that directly contradict scripture, the OT and the NT. I don’t follow Luther, I don’t belong to any denomination, I believe in the word of God. Jesus, who is God, is the ultimate authority in His church, not a man. I don’t defend Protestantism either, all these denominations are man made as well, they’ve only caused to divide, not unite, the body of Christ.
Have you considered the possibility that the lie is actually what you are presenting, rather than the claim of the Church?
If I was Satan, I would think it'd be a good idea to try and discount the basic tenants of the Church started by Christ. And writing bogus history isn't hard.
And who do you think chose what constitutes the Word of God? Was it Luther? Maybe it was Thomas Jefferson and his bible.
The fact is, you don't actually have a Bible or any basic Christian doctrines without the Church you so flagrantly despise.
And one final question: Do you think that the Lord of All Creation started His "real church" only to have it be completely supplanted by a false pagan church a few hundred years later? Doesn't sound very Sovereign to me, and so it doesn't sound like we worship the same God after all. Because the God I worship wouldn't allow such a thing to transpire, and the God I worship is far more powerful than a bunch of pagan Romans.
I follow the OT and the NT, and your supposed “church” does not follow basic Christine doctrines, especially those I pointed out.
“ If I was Satan, I would think it'd be a good idea to try and discount the basic tenants of the Church started by Christ”
Do you even hear yourself?! You’re right, we don’t worship the same God, my God is the Lord God Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, your god is the Roman Catholic Church.
Just spew your uninformed opinion, throw in some ad hominem, and move on like you won and "told him!".
Your ignorance is blinding and your hatred unChristian. Your disdain for Catholicism is palpable. "By their fruits you will know them". Your fruit is sour and repugnant.
I believe the "Protestant" Reformation was simply an operation by the Secret Societies to break up Christiandom.
▪️In the 14th century, The Holy Roman Catholic King Phillip put down the Knights Templars (who also were infiltrated by Gnostics). The Templars are the 14th Century Precursor to Freemasonry. FACT.
▪️in the 15th century, the Spanish Inquisition put down the Lumbrosos "Illumaniti" in Spain.
▪️by this point, in the late 15th Centtury, Epstien like Child sacrifice was Occuring in certain Jewish Sects & the Church put them down as well. Please researh the following child saints & tell me This shit doesnt sound like Epstein:
-Saint Simon of Trent.
-Saint William of Norwich.
-Holy Child of Lagardia. (This sacrifice got Jews Kicked out of Spain in 1492).
By the time Luther came into the picture, the church had already beem at war with Witches, Child Sacrifices, Secret societies... you think this war against Satanic forces is new? The Catholic Church has at least a 700 year, track record of fighting THIS!
Look up the Seal of Martin Luther.➡️ Then Look up the Seal of the Tutors.➡️ Finally, look at the seal for the Rose+Cross. Rosecrutian Secret Society. ➡️
The Protestant movement was begun by THESE secret societies. Stop being tricked into hating the ORIGINAL Church founded by Jesus & the Apostles.
Thanks for the interesting links. Could you please provide further perspective on the long history of pedophilic priests and how to effectively discern good Catholics from bad ones? And what about the vast wealth controlled by the Vatican milked for centuries from continents like South America--is this for good or evil? What about Pope Francis, white or black hat?
I dont trust Burgolio but I was oddly surpised when he recentlh denounced Freemasonry.
I am looking to Arch Bishop Vigano & a few other conservative Spritual leaders for guidance during these confusing times.
In light of Kamala Harris Knights Templar Masonic Police force being exposed in 2015, I believe that this concorted war on the Church goes back to the French Revolution. Look at Mason General Lafayette's gift to Mason General Washington; the Keys to the Bastielle proudly hanging in his house.
I believe our job, as laymen, is to expose the 300 year long plot against the Church by the (G)nistic Secret Societies against the Church.
Re-read the Q drop, referencing the letter that archbishop wrote to President Trump back in 2020 and President Trump retweeted it in that letter, vegan no calls out the freemasons, and it specifically says 'Solvay coagula' the words written on Baphomet, the Templars (Freemason gnostic 5th Collumn) secretly worships. The infiltration & war on Christiandom can be whitnessed in the late 14th century.
If it an organisation whose purpose is to celebrate God why does it have secret emails?
The real question is, how much do they have to glorify God to not be deemed evil?
Secret emails are a side issue at best.
To be fair, Epstein was blessed by Pope John Paul II. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10227373/Photo-reveals-Epstein-Ghislaine-private-meeting-Pope-Vatican.html
Who do you think these 'jews' were procuring children for?
Dude, I am with you on your skepticism! I dont trust any "Pope" since the 1960's!!! I dont believe that any pope since Pius XII is legit.
Vatican II was a coup (read into what Vigano writes about it.)
If we actually had a Holy Pope, he would excommunicate Pelosi, Biden, Trudeau, & the slew of other fakes thats say they are "Catholic".
If we had a Holy Pope, he would destroy that Satanic Snake Building that was built in the late 1960's.
I understand your misgivings but please understand.... the FBI is targetting traditional catholics like myself & not the modernist, Novos Ordo (New Order) Catholics. There is a reason for that....
The RCC is not the original church founded by Jesus and the Apostles, the RCC came into being because Roman Emperor Constantine declared Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire. The first “pope” was established in 606 or 608. The RCC has doctrines and traditions that directly go against the word of God. The Bible doesn’t teach that Mary was a perpetual virgin, she wasn’t sinless, she had to make sacrifices to atone for her sin, nowhere in scripture does it tell us to pray to Mary, she is not a co-redeemer with Christ. The Bible makes it clear we have ONE Mediator between God and man and that’s Jesus Christ alone, not priests. There’s nowhere in scripture that allow for indulgences, anointing a pope and declaring him infallible, praying to saints, etc. I could go on but there’s no need. The word of God is the final authority, not a man made religion.
"The first “pope” was established in 606 or 608"
Your entire comment is full of crap but that is factually wrong.
The Papacy goes back to Peter according to the RCC. Even if you believe that Constantine was the founder, he lived 200 years before you claim the Papacy was created. Total nonsense.
The papacy is a man made belief and it flies in the face of God and His word. I don’t believe Constantine is the founder of the RCC, he declared Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire. Christ is and always has been the head of the church, He has supreme authority over it, not a man that is called the pope, who the RCC claims is infallible. That would disqualify Peter as even he is rebuked by Paul “during his papacy”. You do Peter a great injustice when you attribute him to being the first pope, he would quickly denounce that title. Instead of focusing on what your church says is true, why don’t you actually read the Bible, which has the final authority as it was written by God.
You're wrong again about basically everything in this reply.
"The papacy is a man made belief and it flies in the face of God and His word"
No, it doesn't. The papacy is just the bishop of Rome. Bishops are in God's Word. Peter's role as the earthly head of the church is explicitly described in Matthew 16:18. Straight from the mouth of Jesus Christ.
Constantine didn't "declare Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire", he only granted it legal status. Theodosius I was the one who made it the official religion, DECADES after Constantine's death.
"Christ is and always has been the head of the church"
Yeah, this isn't something any Catholic will disagree with. The pope is only its earthly leader.
"the RCC claims is infallible"
No, it doesn't. You're misrepresenting the concept of papal infallibility, which ONLY applies when the pope is speaking "ex cathedra" which happened like ONCE in 2000 years. Try again.
"That would disqualify Peter as even he is rebuked by Paul “during his papacy”."
No, it wouldn't. You need to study the NT if you don't realize that Peter clearly had authority over all other apostles. That aside, there have been countless examples of popes being corrected throughout history. Take a note from the original 1582 Douay Rheims Catholic Bible on this topic:
"And who is so dull that can not see, that the inferiour, though not by office and iurisdiction, yet by the law of brotherly loue and fraternal correption, may reprehend his superiour? Did euer any man wonder that a good Priest or any vertuous person should tel the Pope, or any other great Prelate, or greatest Prince in earth, their faults? Popes may be reprehended, & are iustly admonished of their faults, & ought to take it in good part, and so they doe & euer haue done, when it commeth of zeale & loue, as of S. Paul, Irenæus, Cyprian, Hierom, Augustin, Bernard: But of Simon Magus, Nouatus, Iulian, Wiclefe, Luther, Caluin, Beza, that doe it of malice, & raile no lesse at their vertues then their vices, of such (I say) God's Prelates must not be taught nor corrected, though they must patiently take it, as our Sauiour did the like reproches of the malitious Iewes; and as Dauid did the malediction of Semel. 2. Reg. 16."
"You do Peter a great injustice when you attribute him to being the first pope, he would quickly denounce that title"
Wrong. As stated earlier, the official title of the papacy is "bishop of Rome". "Pope" is basically just Italian slang for "papa". It's a term of respect, and the concept of the apostles referring to themselves as spiritual fathers can be found in the Old and New Testaments. Peter himself even refers to himself as Mark's "father" (1 Peter 5:13).
"Instead of focusing on what your church says is true, why don’t you actually read the Bible, which has the final authority as it was written by God."
Instead of making baseless assumptions about me and the RCC, how about you actually learn what you're talking about instead of repeating centuries-old, debunked talking points?
So you just chose to believe that Christianity went underground for 1,500 until a perverted German Gnostic "Catholic" Priest, broke his vows, married a Nun & decided to edit the Bible? Is that really what Protestants believe?
You believe there are 40,000 different Protestant ways instead of the ONE & ORIGINAL Apostolic Church?
You know that the Holy Roman Catholic Church has been fighting Satanic Epstein Child Killers since the MidEavil ages, correct? You know The RCC has been at war with Satanic Freemasons since the French Revolution, correct?
Look up Saint Simon of Trent. Look up Saint William of Norwich, Look up the Holy Child of Largadia & educate youself on how REAL Christian society handled the Synagogue of Satan.
There's a Reason Q came online 500 years to the date of the "Reformation". There is a reason Q mentions Vigano.
There's a reason POTUS retweeted Vigano's letter to Potus back in 2020. EDUCATE YOURSELF.
I noticed you chose not to address anything I said about the obvious beliefs of the RCC that directly contradict scripture, the OT and the NT. I don’t follow Luther, I don’t belong to any denomination, I believe in the word of God. Jesus, who is God, is the ultimate authority in His church, not a man. I don’t defend Protestantism either, all these denominations are man made as well, they’ve only caused to divide, not unite, the body of Christ.
Protestantism divided; before then virtually everyone agreed.
How many books are in the Bible? Are they infallible?
Have you considered the possibility that the lie is actually what you are presenting, rather than the claim of the Church?
If I was Satan, I would think it'd be a good idea to try and discount the basic tenants of the Church started by Christ. And writing bogus history isn't hard.
And who do you think chose what constitutes the Word of God? Was it Luther? Maybe it was Thomas Jefferson and his bible.
The fact is, you don't actually have a Bible or any basic Christian doctrines without the Church you so flagrantly despise.
And one final question: Do you think that the Lord of All Creation started His "real church" only to have it be completely supplanted by a false pagan church a few hundred years later? Doesn't sound very Sovereign to me, and so it doesn't sound like we worship the same God after all. Because the God I worship wouldn't allow such a thing to transpire, and the God I worship is far more powerful than a bunch of pagan Romans.
I follow the OT and the NT, and your supposed “church” does not follow basic Christine doctrines, especially those I pointed out.
“ If I was Satan, I would think it'd be a good idea to try and discount the basic tenants of the Church started by Christ”
Do you even hear yourself?! You’re right, we don’t worship the same God, my God is the Lord God Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, your god is the Roman Catholic Church.
You people love not answering questions.
Just spew your uninformed opinion, throw in some ad hominem, and move on like you won and "told him!".
Your ignorance is blinding and your hatred unChristian. Your disdain for Catholicism is palpable. "By their fruits you will know them". Your fruit is sour and repugnant.