We’re seeing different things from the same 2 Q posts. What I’m seeing in Q post #2598 is that Q is validating “QAnon” as being a legit thing because Q is replying to an Anon who pointed out the artist signed the painting “QA” (abbreviation for QAnon). Q replies to the Anon that the ‘Santa with the hammer’ painting is signed by “QA > ‘QAnon’ > Hammer” (quote from Q in that post).
In Q post #4881, Q is declaring that “QAnon” is NOT a legitimate thing. In #4881, Q says: “There is no ‘QAnon.’ 3”
I’m baffled re: why you’re not seeing how these 2 Q posts directly contradict each other.
We’re seeing different things from the same 2 Q posts. What I’m seeing in Q post #2598 is that Q is validating “QAnon” as being a legit thing because Q is replying to an Anon who pointed out the artist signed the painting “QA” (abbreviation for QAnon). Q replies to the Anon that the ‘Santa with the hammer’ painting is signed by “QA > ‘QAnon’ > Hammer” (quote from Q in that post).
In Q post #4881, Q is declaring that “QAnon” is NOT a legitimate thing. In #4881, Q says: “There is no ‘QAnon.’ 3”
I’m baffled re: why you’re not seeing how these 2 Q posts directly contradict each other.
They contradict each other because you want it to. You quote 4881 but then stop right where you wanted to.
Agree to disagree.