An interesting topic of conversation came up over Thanksgiving. My sister is pretty savvy on what's going down. She's aware of the Cabal. She's hip on Q (or at least mostly aware of the Q story). I don't think she is fully aware of everything, but far more than most.
But she also is not a fan of Trump. She recognizes that most of what is said about him is a lie, but she just doesn't like him. She thinks he's a blowhard and overly divisive. I agree with her, but I've explained to her (albeit briefly) why I think both of those qualities are intentional. However, she doesn't care. She does however love RFK, Jr. She said she would vote for him in a heartbeat no matter what party flag he waves.
I thought about it, and I think RFK, Jr. could very likely be a unifying force, not to mention that there is both a sense of justice and closure to the effort of Q if he became President.
What do you think? What if RFK is the democrat nominee, or even an independent. Would you vote for him over Trump? Even if not, even if you think such a statement is sacrilegious, do you think he would be good for the country? Do you think he would be a unifying force? Do you think him as President would bring honest debate to the table on the "hot topics?" Do you think he would be able to put an end to the propaganda driven division (not by himself of course, but rather, as part of the Q plan)?
Of course, I don't know what The Plan is, and I don't think anything can change the course, but there are layers upon layers to The Plan, and there is nothing better than a surprise ending, especially one that feels like Justice. Who knows. Maybe RFK, Jr. IS The Plan.
What do you think of him as President for 2024?
Incorrect. I have shown HOW the Cabal owns the world. The specific methods they employ. The structure of the system. FROM THERE, looking at Trump's past, those exact same systems and methods and people are everywhere apparent.
There is a pattern, legally, corporately, in connections and actions. There are systems that determine those patterns. Trump follows the exact same pattern, and has all the same exact people around him, as friends, colleagues, business partners, people that give him loans, people he does deals with, people he calls friends, people his daughter is banging, etc., throughout his entire adult life.
My argument has nothing to do with nebulous arguments. But you CAN'T KNOW THAT, if you don't actually read my argument. Instead you assume it mustn't be true, or that the argument can't actually show what I suggest.
If you don't listen to what someone has to say, then go about spewing such nonsense as "their argument was nebulous," or they "made vague claims without evidence," you are nothing but a dishonest person, attempting to discredit someone purely to justify your beliefs.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I think Trump was an insider not because it is "impossible to beat the Cabal", on the contrary, I think it is absolutely possible, but not without "playing their game". You MUST be an insider to take down that structure. I think Trump is (or was) Cabal because I know the details of the system that was in place when he was doing what needed to happen to make it in that world. Because I know how the system works, how it was constructed, etc. I know what he would have had to do to "make it." There would be certain pieces of evidence, certain actions, certain connections. Trump checks all the boxes and more besides. He wasn't just "compromised," he was deep in it.
Perhaps he was "part of a plan" for decades. It's certainly not impossible. Perhaps he did "what he needed to do," like a secret agent, who does compromising things for "The Greater Good." Who the hell knows. BUT THE EVIDENCE STRONGLY SUPPORTS him having done some pretty bad things. And you can't see that, if you don't see how the system actually works, which is what my report is about. Not a "nebulous claim" on a single page, paragraph, or sentence in the entire thing.
Still waiting to see this.
You CAN'T SEE IT unless you understand how the system works. Until you read my report, you can't see the evidence. It is too easy to dismiss. You must understand the pattern, to see any new example of the pattern. You must understand how the system is constructed such that a person becomes compromised to see that the exact same circumstances surround Trump's events.
I tried to show you in the Bond issue, but you couldn't see it. You simply do not understand how that is exactly how these "deals with the devil" progress until you see how often those exact circumstances happen, how they progress, how Trump checks every box.
This is what I call a "nebulous argument".
The only thing you said about Bond Issue was that Wilbur Ross was working for the Rothschilds at the time. Not only is it not a proof of anything, let alone that he was "indebted to Rothschilds".
You wanted evidence from me that Trump shafted the Bankers. Here is an evidence thats atleast better quality than yours:
Trump beats out Icahn for control of casion
The pattern you see here is a typical business pattern
Since you refuse to even stick your neck and define what you mean by "deal with the devil", let me tell you what it means to me. It means abusing little kids to provide blackmail material.
And no, you can be successful in business to a great extent without having to make that deal. Only when you want to be at the helm of the latest and greatest Cabal scam (like Facebook, Google etc), then you most probably have to make such a deal, even though I am sure there are some even at that level that managed without.
If you had bothered to read the article I presented you would understand that the reason for the events in your "evidence" of him "beating the banks" is because of the Cabal agents that helped him. E.g.,
He "negotiated with lenders". Why did he do that? Because:
The lenders had control of his assets. Who are the lenders? (Hint, there is only one bank in the whole entire world, and it is controlled by the Cabal.) What happened in those negotiations? Who helped him with the Lenders?
Ross, one of Rothschilds top guys "made a plea" stepping in for Trump. But Prudential is already an agency of Rothschild. Hell, everyone involved there was already an agency or agent of Rothschild. The whole thing was just theatre.
Couldn't have done it without Bollenbach. Nor apparently Ross. Both Bollenbach and Ross are Cabal agents. Trump was in serious trouble, they solved all his problems. This is what a forced coercion looks like. "Play ball, or else." IF you play ball, we'll make this go away.
That pattern is everywhere at the top of the game. It's Business as Usual. But until you understand why it is business as usual, how that system of coercion was created, set up, managed, who did it, why, and how often, you can't see the pattern. THAT is what my report is about. The construction of that system. That system creates a pattern. This follows that pattern to a tee. But this is just ONE example from Trump's past that suggests his involvement with the Cabal, and compromises he had to make. But until you understand that:
is a system specifically designed to create such compromises, you can't understand. You simply can't. You must understand the construction, and breadth of the system, to understand why I am saying the things I am saying.
You are welcome to continue to live in ignorance if you want, but you will come to all the wrong conclusions if you do. If you would like to understand what you are missing, read my damn report.
As for the article you posted, not a single bank was harmed in the making of that movie. If you think you have something there, you have to be very explicit with what you think it is. Then let me know. Then I will attempt to show you the problems with your reasoning. It would be a whole lot easier however if you just understood how the system fucking worked.
Me telling you that you must read how the system works in order to understand how the system works is not the definition of a "nebulous argument". You calling it that is purely an attempt to ignore what I am actually saying.
I was also showing you the article, and stated that within the article was the evidence. I called out specifically to look at Bollenbach. Yes, I didn't go through all of the details of what the article said, that's what the article is for.
THAT IS EACTLY WHAT I AM SAYING!!!
As far as I have found, the absolute pinnacle of success without doing those bad things is somewhere in the VP range. Not a single CEO of a major corporation that I have found doesn't also have all the other necessary connections (like friends with Epstein, or Theil, etc.). Not a single person on a Board of Directors doesn't also have all of the signals. Not a single President of a school, and frankly, not a single Senator (at least not one of the well known ones) or President either. Not a single General. Not a single Admiral. Not a single Supreme Court judge, etc.
See a pattern? Every single person who makes it that high has all of the signals of being compromised. Not just in their personal connections, or symbology, but in the story of how they got there. THAT is the pattern. That is what is most important. How did they get that high? Everyone follows that pattern, and that pattern always flows through the top level Cabal (like being bailed out by Rothschild directly as just one example of what I mean).
But it is essential to understand that there are levels of being compromised. There are those who like diddling kids, and there are those that do it once as the required entry into The Game. Not everyone is equally controlled, but they all have strings attached, and they are attached during their required deals with the devil that got them there.
I promise you, if you read my report, your view will change substantially. It isn't just these organizations. It's not just "the media," or even "the really big businesses," it's everyone who is bigger than a corner store.