Sure, there are multiple definitions. You need to read the rest of the post for context though.
“Everyone has got to watch her interview on election fraud with the poor sap who got taken apart by her. Thank you Don Jr. for putting this masterpiece out for the public to see. WITCH HUNT!”
Does that sound like he thinks she is full of shit or exaggerating?
And which direction is the witch hunt? Could “masterpiece” be sarcastic? If it’s fake news but Trump doesn’t want to say something explicit to discredit it outright at the moment so that Jan’s team (which by her description would be part of the current Biden/Obama administration) gets an opportunity to spin its web more, what kind of post might he write to get anons’ attention on it?
Maybe so. Just not quite sure what purpose it really serves other than muddying the already muddy waters. At this point I’m not sure anyone knows who will end up a white hat.
His term was “fantastic”. Have a look at the various definitions of that word in the dictionary.
Good catch. It could very well be taken as (Unrealistic.)
ty THIS makes sense
Sure, there are multiple definitions. You need to read the rest of the post for context though.
“Everyone has got to watch her interview on election fraud with the poor sap who got taken apart by her. Thank you Don Jr. for putting this masterpiece out for the public to see. WITCH HUNT!”
Does that sound like he thinks she is full of shit or exaggerating?
And which direction is the witch hunt? Could “masterpiece” be sarcastic? If it’s fake news but Trump doesn’t want to say something explicit to discredit it outright at the moment so that Jan’s team (which by her description would be part of the current Biden/Obama administration) gets an opportunity to spin its web more, what kind of post might he write to get anons’ attention on it?
Maybe so. Just not quite sure what purpose it really serves other than muddying the already muddy waters. At this point I’m not sure anyone knows who will end up a white hat.
The Q drops give a lot of insight into moves and countermoves.
He is specifically citing her views on the election theft.
If she was a grifter or worse there is no way he draws attention to her. Just my opinion.