Steve Kirsch’s MIT talk on 11/30 (he starts around 24 mins):
https://rumble.com/v3yovx4-vsrf-live-104-exclusive-mit-speech-by-steve-kirsch.html
The latest 4 articles on Kirsch’s substack are all on this topic:
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
Igor Chudov’s analysis of the data:
Professor Norman Fenton’s response (he is referenced in Kirsch’s MIT talk):
I'll admit I've kinda tuned out on the vaccine/mask safety issue. In my personal circle the vaccinated/unvaccinated aren't seeing different results--at least not at an obviously different level.
There are a lot of difficulties in performing these analyses:
COVID test results aren't reliable or comparable.
Frequent conflation of "died with" vs. "died from".
Vast differences in record keeping across regions.
Definition of "vaccinated" is not consistent, and frequently < 14 days vaccinated is "unvaccinated".
Hospital treatment procedures can cause tremendously different results. Hospitals can treat vaccinated differently than unvaccinated. What % of the "deaths" were actually hospital murders?
Many studies focus on something like "protection from COVID" but will exclude other health issues.
Speed of virus spread--along with regional differences in all of the above factors--makes regional comparisons difficult to impossible. Especially w/NZ & Australia. (You see NZ and Sweden often being compared right now, which IMO is extremely tricky.) The variant that lands at a place 6 months later probably isn't quite what it was when it first emerged.
So yeah, there are a lot of studies, but they tend to be constructed in ways that aren't useful for extracting meaning.
I'd be curious to look at the record level data if anyone knows a working link.
It's not about Covid, it is about the vax.