Mar-a-Lago Judge Unseals Docs Jack Smith Warned Would Reveal Govt’s Plans
(conservativebrief.com)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
So basically, this shady AF character Jack Smith will get to submit a “written summary” of what a document SUPPOSEDLY says (just like hiding behind redactions on a document that we’re just SUPPOSED to believe are being redacted for a VALID reason) and Jack Smith gets to substitute that summary-provided-by-his-side type of evidence as a substitute to the raw data / evidence.
This stinks to high heaven - no different than the FBI lying out their asses to obtain unjustified FISA warrants to spy on innocent citizens.
No.
The summary needs to get approved by the judge who gets to read the original document.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18a/compiledact-96-456/section-4
That sounds a little better. Thank you for that clarification. But if the judge turns out to be a scumbag (like Ergonan and others), then the judge approving the summary of the redacted info still won’t be any help to Pres. Trump.