If they ever worked for the CIA I’d suspect it was for the White Hats in the CIA. They both have family members in the CIA and freely admit it. And they claim their families are very patriotic and go back to the founding.
If they ever worked for the CIA I’d suspect it was for the White Hats in the CIA.
First, there's probably not a whole lot of "white hats" in the C_A. The C_A is an agency designed by the Cabal specifically to be their black hat "social control agency." It was created by marrying the Rockefeller created OSS with the Rockefeller funded Nazi intelligence agency (Gehlen Organization).
Second, what evidence makes you think that Tucker and AJ were "undercover white hats" in an organization that only recruits black hats, or people who are clueless who they work for?
Let's look at AJ. First, Q specifically calls him out as a Cabal agent (Mossad controlled opposition agent), so there's that. But far more importantly, what does he do? He gives some really good evidence of fuckery. But he also acts like a lunatic. What does that do? It associates the good evidence he shows with his lunacy. If you try to show the evidence through one of AJ's reports, a person will look at it and say, "OMG, it's Alex Jones. You are a crazy conspiracy theorist, just like him! Look at him, he think's he's an alien abductee. He thinks lizard people are eating brains and Rich people are murdering babies and drinking their blood. Where is the evidence for that?"
And that's the thing. The really crazy stuff, even if it's true, he provides zero, or really poor evidence for. ALL of his actions discredit the good information he provides. The good information and evidence is associated with "crazy," thus it remains hidden. That is exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like.
The Truth needs an outlet. AJ is that outlet, and he makes the truth look false to anyone who is skeptical by association with his lunacy.
Now lets look at Carlson. His father has Cabal written all over him. He himself has decades of work presenting the "Conservative view." What is the "Conservative view?" It is the OPPOSITE SIDE of the "Liberal View." He gives the truth (but only part of the truth) and says constantly that "The other side is lying." What does that do? That drives division. What is the primary purpose of Controlled Opposition agents? To create social division. It isn't about what is true or false. BOTH SIDES present the truth, but only part of the truth. That makes people believe them. Then, on each side, the agents say "the other side is lying." And it's true. It's ALWAYS true. The other side IS lying by omission. And both sides are getting part of the truth (but not the whole truth). The Left and The Right have both been controlled by the Cabal since their beginning.
Don't believe me? Ask yourself, why are there "two sides?" You put 100 people in a room and ask them their ideas on something and you will get 100 different responses. You put 100 people in a room and force them to put on a blue shirt or a red shirt and you will get 2 responses. When people are forced to pick a side, they will choose whichever one they align with best, and then, to ensure "their side" wins, they will concede whatever they have to, give up whatever they are forced to, to ensure "victory." So if you want to control the narrative, make two boxes, force everyone to join one or the other, and feed them both the truth in scope, then say "the other side is lying." Tucker has fulfilled that role perfectly for decades.
Exactly as he was self-admittedly trained at the C_A to do.
“Alex is a lunatic” is a subjective statement. Not an argument to hang your hat on. You say he discredits the truth so nobody will believe it, yet millions credit him with waking them up.
Also, you have no evidence they are or ever were on the CIA payroll.
Q said some disinfo is necessary. The Q movement couldn’t be the “Alex Movement,” therefore, that disinfo was necessary.
It's not my opinion. I don't think it's true. That is what the world see's (that link is just one of a thousand hit pieces on AJ’s particular brand of crazy). Any article on him talks about how crazy he is. He talks about truly whacked out shit all the time and he is quoted on it all the time. Suggesting that statement is controversial in the broader public view is just being willfully blind.
You say he discredits the truth so nobody will believe it, yet millions credit him with waking them up.
I am looking at what actually happens as a result of his actions. It isn't about what I want. I don’t think AJ is a lunatic at all. I think he is a really smart and gifted actor. What I am talking about is the actual effect he has.
Yes, after people start to question their reality, they get a lot of good evidence from Alex Jones. Then they go around trying to red pill their friends. Then they show their friends Alex Jones’ work, or they quote AJ, or they talk about some of the things he says that don’t have any evidential support (as supplied by him, or in general). Then their friends think that Alex Jones is a lunatic, because he acts like a lunatic, and sounds like a lunatic, and says things attributed to lunacy (the human body is just an alien antenna e.g.). Then all the good evidence he shows gets discredited by association with his crazy talk. The most important thing to appreciate here is that by "crazy talk" I specifically mean those statements he makes that are not believable (even if they are true) for which he shows no supporting evidence. Such statements make a person look crazy. Even if they are making statements of the most profound truth, it doesn't appear that way. I suggest that is intentional.
What actually happens is that Alex Jones “wakes up” very few people. The millions that find him, find him because they are already questioning their reality and he is the largest voice speaking the truth. When they find him, they can’t use him as a source, because he has no credibility. His lack of credibility is due not to the really good reports he puts out, but to the other things he says that act to discredit him, and thus the truth.
The truth needs an outlet. If that outlet is not believable by someone who already doesn’t believe, then the truth remains hidden. If, on the other hand, you do already believe something, and AJ is giving further good information on it, you will be a fan of AJ, thus separating you from the other people you wish to show “the truth” to by your association to AJ, either by quoting him, showing his work, or just sounding like him. What actually happens is that he creates division between the truth, those that want to talk about the truth (Truthers) and the rest of society. He helps to create boxes for people to sort themselves in to, thus the division. Whether that is intentional or not, that is what actually happens. That is the AJ effect.
He is not alone. All Truther leaders do the same thing. They all talk about whacked out shit (which may or may not be true) and provide no evidence for it. They also all have provable or stated direct ties to the C_A.
Also, you have no evidence they are or ever were on the CIA payroll.
Alex Jones explicitly stated that his father (and other members of his family) was on the C_A payroll. True or not, it is a stated direct connection to the Agency. Q explicitly stated that AJ was a Mossad agent as shown in the link above. Mossad and the C_A are the same agency.
Tucker Carlson spoke at a rally on his campus about the C_A recruiters there, defending them. He then later is explicitly stated as having gone through the application process for the C_A. He is then stated as having been rejected.
Immediately afterwards, his father, who is easily proven to be a member of the Cabal, is appointed the head of the Voice of America by George H. W. Bush and the Carlson family moves from California to D.C.. VoA is the C_A’s media front and Tucker Carlson's father became the head of a major arm of the C_A right after Tucker applied to the C_A. George H. W. Bush, who personally appointed Mr. Carlson to head an important C_A organization right after his son applies to the C_A, is the former head of the C_A. GHWB was the head of the C_A during the Church Committee hearings and ran interference for the C_A there when the Senate investigation outed the C_A as having hundreds of American media talking heads as their agents.
When his father took over the VoA, Tucker then immediately began working as a “editor and fact checker” for the Heritage Foundation, which is itself just a front organization for the C_A. “Fact checkers” are one of the C_A’s primary tools for controlling information. Tucker then became a media star, basically instantly. In his early career he ran interference for the C_A regarding Iran-Contra, one of the most blatant C_A corruption scandals ever (that made it to the public), that no one ever talks about or knows the details of.
You find patterns like this everywhere. Numerous threads leading directly to the C_A/Cabal in the biggest names in media, on all sides, going back to their origin stories. This has always been the case. What are the odds that that pattern exists in all the big names purely by chance? I suggest somewhere in the range of zero, especially given the explicit statements made by numerous people (including the Church Committee) that all big media people work for the C_A in some fashion. It isn’t that the C_A subverts top level media stars, it’s that you can’t make it big unless you are already working for them. All evidence suggests that the media is completely controlled.
Now those may not be enough pieces of evidence to convince you, and that's fair, but it's just a start, and it is supporting evidence for the assertions, so not "no evidence."
Q said some disinfo is necessary. The Q movement couldn’t be the “Alex Movement,” therefore, that disinfo was necessary.
Citing the "some disinfo is necessary" statement to cover every thing you don't want to be true is not using reason, but justifying belief. Look at the actual facts contained within the Q statements. Look at all the evidence of connections between AJ and Mossad/C_A. Look. Don’t be a True Believer. That will not help you uncover the scope of the deception.
I don't know what happened. I don't know who is really in charge of what or who is working for whom. I don't know that there are "two sides" to "flip" to, now or ever.
I do think it is entirely possible that is the case. Indeed, if the Q narrative is true, it would have to be the case that there are insiders at every level (except maybe the top) that have flipped sides. I even think it is likely that at least AJ has flipped.
Carlson maybe. There is just so much Cabal in his blood. He was born to it, but maybe.
If they ever worked for the CIA I’d suspect it was for the White Hats in the CIA. They both have family members in the CIA and freely admit it. And they claim their families are very patriotic and go back to the founding.
First, there's probably not a whole lot of "white hats" in the C_A. The C_A is an agency designed by the Cabal specifically to be their black hat "social control agency." It was created by marrying the Rockefeller created OSS with the Rockefeller funded Nazi intelligence agency (Gehlen Organization).
Second, what evidence makes you think that Tucker and AJ were "undercover white hats" in an organization that only recruits black hats, or people who are clueless who they work for?
Let's look at AJ. First, Q specifically calls him out as a Cabal agent (Mossad controlled opposition agent), so there's that. But far more importantly, what does he do? He gives some really good evidence of fuckery. But he also acts like a lunatic. What does that do? It associates the good evidence he shows with his lunacy. If you try to show the evidence through one of AJ's reports, a person will look at it and say, "OMG, it's Alex Jones. You are a crazy conspiracy theorist, just like him! Look at him, he think's he's an alien abductee. He thinks lizard people are eating brains and Rich people are murdering babies and drinking their blood. Where is the evidence for that?"
And that's the thing. The really crazy stuff, even if it's true, he provides zero, or really poor evidence for. ALL of his actions discredit the good information he provides. The good information and evidence is associated with "crazy," thus it remains hidden. That is exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like.
The Truth needs an outlet. AJ is that outlet, and he makes the truth look false to anyone who is skeptical by association with his lunacy.
Now lets look at Carlson. His father has Cabal written all over him. He himself has decades of work presenting the "Conservative view." What is the "Conservative view?" It is the OPPOSITE SIDE of the "Liberal View." He gives the truth (but only part of the truth) and says constantly that "The other side is lying." What does that do? That drives division. What is the primary purpose of Controlled Opposition agents? To create social division. It isn't about what is true or false. BOTH SIDES present the truth, but only part of the truth. That makes people believe them. Then, on each side, the agents say "the other side is lying." And it's true. It's ALWAYS true. The other side IS lying by omission. And both sides are getting part of the truth (but not the whole truth). The Left and The Right have both been controlled by the Cabal since their beginning.
Don't believe me? Ask yourself, why are there "two sides?" You put 100 people in a room and ask them their ideas on something and you will get 100 different responses. You put 100 people in a room and force them to put on a blue shirt or a red shirt and you will get 2 responses. When people are forced to pick a side, they will choose whichever one they align with best, and then, to ensure "their side" wins, they will concede whatever they have to, give up whatever they are forced to, to ensure "victory." So if you want to control the narrative, make two boxes, force everyone to join one or the other, and feed them both the truth in scope, then say "the other side is lying." Tucker has fulfilled that role perfectly for decades.
Exactly as he was self-admittedly trained at the C_A to do.
“Alex is a lunatic” is a subjective statement. Not an argument to hang your hat on. You say he discredits the truth so nobody will believe it, yet millions credit him with waking them up.
Also, you have no evidence they are or ever were on the CIA payroll.
Q said some disinfo is necessary. The Q movement couldn’t be the “Alex Movement,” therefore, that disinfo was necessary.
It's not my opinion. I don't think it's true. That is what the world see's (that link is just one of a thousand hit pieces on AJ’s particular brand of crazy). Any article on him talks about how crazy he is. He talks about truly whacked out shit all the time and he is quoted on it all the time. Suggesting that statement is controversial in the broader public view is just being willfully blind.
I am looking at what actually happens as a result of his actions. It isn't about what I want. I don’t think AJ is a lunatic at all. I think he is a really smart and gifted actor. What I am talking about is the actual effect he has.
Yes, after people start to question their reality, they get a lot of good evidence from Alex Jones. Then they go around trying to red pill their friends. Then they show their friends Alex Jones’ work, or they quote AJ, or they talk about some of the things he says that don’t have any evidential support (as supplied by him, or in general). Then their friends think that Alex Jones is a lunatic, because he acts like a lunatic, and sounds like a lunatic, and says things attributed to lunacy (the human body is just an alien antenna e.g.). Then all the good evidence he shows gets discredited by association with his crazy talk. The most important thing to appreciate here is that by "crazy talk" I specifically mean those statements he makes that are not believable (even if they are true) for which he shows no supporting evidence. Such statements make a person look crazy. Even if they are making statements of the most profound truth, it doesn't appear that way. I suggest that is intentional.
What actually happens is that Alex Jones “wakes up” very few people. The millions that find him, find him because they are already questioning their reality and he is the largest voice speaking the truth. When they find him, they can’t use him as a source, because he has no credibility. His lack of credibility is due not to the really good reports he puts out, but to the other things he says that act to discredit him, and thus the truth.
The truth needs an outlet. If that outlet is not believable by someone who already doesn’t believe, then the truth remains hidden. If, on the other hand, you do already believe something, and AJ is giving further good information on it, you will be a fan of AJ, thus separating you from the other people you wish to show “the truth” to by your association to AJ, either by quoting him, showing his work, or just sounding like him. What actually happens is that he creates division between the truth, those that want to talk about the truth (Truthers) and the rest of society. He helps to create boxes for people to sort themselves in to, thus the division. Whether that is intentional or not, that is what actually happens. That is the AJ effect.
It also happens to be how the C_A is noted to control information in their takeover of other countries (see the details of Operation PBSUCCESS e.g.).
He is not alone. All Truther leaders do the same thing. They all talk about whacked out shit (which may or may not be true) and provide no evidence for it. They also all have provable or stated direct ties to the C_A.
Alex Jones explicitly stated that his father (and other members of his family) was on the C_A payroll. True or not, it is a stated direct connection to the Agency. Q explicitly stated that AJ was a Mossad agent as shown in the link above. Mossad and the C_A are the same agency.
Tucker Carlson spoke at a rally on his campus about the C_A recruiters there, defending them. He then later is explicitly stated as having gone through the application process for the C_A. He is then stated as having been rejected.
Immediately afterwards, his father, who is easily proven to be a member of the Cabal, is appointed the head of the Voice of America by George H. W. Bush and the Carlson family moves from California to D.C.. VoA is the C_A’s media front and Tucker Carlson's father became the head of a major arm of the C_A right after Tucker applied to the C_A. George H. W. Bush, who personally appointed Mr. Carlson to head an important C_A organization right after his son applies to the C_A, is the former head of the C_A. GHWB was the head of the C_A during the Church Committee hearings and ran interference for the C_A there when the Senate investigation outed the C_A as having hundreds of American media talking heads as their agents.
When his father took over the VoA, Tucker then immediately began working as a “editor and fact checker” for the Heritage Foundation, which is itself just a front organization for the C_A. “Fact checkers” are one of the C_A’s primary tools for controlling information. Tucker then became a media star, basically instantly. In his early career he ran interference for the C_A regarding Iran-Contra, one of the most blatant C_A corruption scandals ever (that made it to the public), that no one ever talks about or knows the details of.
You find patterns like this everywhere. Numerous threads leading directly to the C_A/Cabal in the biggest names in media, on all sides, going back to their origin stories. This has always been the case. What are the odds that that pattern exists in all the big names purely by chance? I suggest somewhere in the range of zero, especially given the explicit statements made by numerous people (including the Church Committee) that all big media people work for the C_A in some fashion. It isn’t that the C_A subverts top level media stars, it’s that you can’t make it big unless you are already working for them. All evidence suggests that the media is completely controlled.
Now those may not be enough pieces of evidence to convince you, and that's fair, but it's just a start, and it is supporting evidence for the assertions, so not "no evidence."
Citing the "some disinfo is necessary" statement to cover every thing you don't want to be true is not using reason, but justifying belief. Look at the actual facts contained within the Q statements. Look at all the evidence of connections between AJ and Mossad/C_A. Look. Don’t be a True Believer. That will not help you uncover the scope of the deception.
The same argument can be made about Trump: “He makes us look crazy!”
The same argument can be made about Q: “It makes us look crazy!”
Not a good foundation to build your argument on.
Robert David Steele was actually in the CIA, but he became a whistleblower who exposed them. There are a few like him.
Association is not the same as guilt.
Excellent points! Can you address the possibility that both Tucker and AJ have been flipped?
I don't know what happened. I don't know who is really in charge of what or who is working for whom. I don't know that there are "two sides" to "flip" to, now or ever.
I do think it is entirely possible that is the case. Indeed, if the Q narrative is true, it would have to be the case that there are insiders at every level (except maybe the top) that have flipped sides. I even think it is likely that at least AJ has flipped.
Carlson maybe. There is just so much Cabal in his blood. He was born to it, but maybe.