I'm familiar with the work of Linda Moulton Howe, along with Jacques Vallee, John Keel, Stanton Friedman, Zechariah Sitchin, Lloyd Pye, and many other writers and scientists who take this field of study seriously. Taken as a whole, the subject definitely deserves our attention.
The media and government has certainly been actively dissuading us from looking at it, having painted the subject as "tinfoil hat conspiracy material" not worthy of serious thought. For that reason alone, it seems we should keep an open mind about the probability that we are not alone in the universe.
Well... I actually knew Sitchin when he was alive, and attended several of his conferences. I know that his interpretations of Sumerian cuneiform tablets are "controversial" in the archeology world, but they were originally interpreted back in the 1800s when no one knew of flight and astronomy was in its infancy.
His later interpretations are intriguing to say the least. His first book, "The Twelfth Planet" is so well researched and referenced / cited that it made an impression on me. I don't dismiss Sitchin so casually.
Who is downvoting? Probably just someone who isn't deeply familiar with the material and who simply reacts rather than researches. It doesn't bother me.
I'm familiar with the work of Linda Moulton Howe, along with Jacques Vallee, John Keel, Stanton Friedman, Zechariah Sitchin, Lloyd Pye, and many other writers and scientists who take this field of study seriously. Taken as a whole, the subject definitely deserves our attention.
The media and government has certainly been actively dissuading us from looking at it, having painted the subject as "tinfoil hat conspiracy material" not worthy of serious thought. For that reason alone, it seems we should keep an open mind about the probability that we are not alone in the universe.
In general, yes. But I'd cross Stitchin off that list.
Well... I actually knew Sitchin when he was alive, and attended several of his conferences. I know that his interpretations of Sumerian cuneiform tablets are "controversial" in the archeology world, but they were originally interpreted back in the 1800s when no one knew of flight and astronomy was in its infancy.
His later interpretations are intriguing to say the least. His first book, "The Twelfth Planet" is so well researched and referenced / cited that it made an impression on me. I don't dismiss Sitchin so casually.
Yes.
You could include Leslie Kean in the list of authors on the UAP data. It was the first book I purchased on the subject. WTF is downvoting you?
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record by Leslie Kean
Who is downvoting? Probably just someone who isn't deeply familiar with the material and who simply reacts rather than researches. It doesn't bother me.