It seems either I wrote my post with some awkward wording, or you misunderstood some of my points, because I tend to agree or at least not be in disagreement with a good portion of what you wrote, with some quibbles on a few points here and there (which is to be expected at a minimum, given the number of lies we’ve been fed).
Will try to clarify later if I have time, but I deleted my post after penisse deleted his for whatever reason.
The interesting one was on the flood. “Was it global as we’ve been taught or more localized?”
The interesting one was on the flood. “Was it global as we’ve been taught or more localized?”
It was a local flood, not worldwide.
It did not wipe out other people (or animals) in the world.
There are contemporaneous historical accounts elsewhere in the world that did not report a great flood in their area of the world. So, it could not have been worldwide.
The Hebrew word has been mistranslated to "world" or "earth" when it means "land." The land was flooded, to wipe out the people who were wicked.
The reason they were wicked is because they had become corrupted by mixing with the Satanic lineage.
Have you ever considered what God's First Law was?
It is right there in Genesis 1:1.
"Kind after kind."
God creates, and He expects His creation to remain of the same kind. Only humans have the free will to disobey. And many Adamites did by mixing with non-Adamites (Kenites -- of Cain, primarily, but they eventually created other race mixes, as well, none of whom were of God's creation).
This is the true meaning of the 5th Commandment: Honor Thy Father and Thy Mother.
This is usually thought of to mean to respect your parents. But what if your parents are assholes? What if they are abusive? What if they are wicked? Why should they be honored?
I think the true meaning is to honor ALL of your ancestors. Not just your parents, but your grandparents, great grandparents, going all the way back.
And the way you do this is "kind after kind."
Again, the Bible is a story about the family tree of Adam. The Commandments are directed at the Israelites, who are part of that family tree.
The 5th Commandment tells THEM not to race mix outside of their race.
THIS is why God flooded the land, to wipe out all those who had violated His Law.
Jude 1:7:
Even as Sodom and Gomorrha ... going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
What is "strange flesh?" It is race mixing.
It's not that the other races are bad, per se. It's just that they are other races, and not of the same race. Not kind after kind, and therefore a violation of God's Law.
The Bible is the story of the family tree of Adam, and how his descendants are supposed to live. These people are the Adamites. A subset of them became the Israelites, who eventually migrated to the Caucasus mountain region, and then into Europe, becoming known as the Caucasians.
It should not be suprising, then, that the influences of Hollywood, media, etc. are trying to convince White people to race mix, but they don't want it in Israel.
Do a Google search (use Google.com, as distasteful as that is) and search the term "happy white woman," click on images, and tell me what images you see. Who controls Google? Who did I say that the Bible tells us were descended from Cain, among others? Who was Cain the son of? What is Satan (the "Adversary" in Hebrew)? What does Revelation 12:7-9 tells us that the archangel Michael did to Satan in heaven?
It ALL makes sense when you look at it from this perspective. The Bible makes sense (OT and NT work in unison). History makes sense. What is going on in our world today makes sense.
If you think about the "Chosen People," and the covenant God gave to Abraham, then Isaac, then Jacob/Israel, all of these promises have been fulfilled by the White Europeans, and no one else in history:
Spread across the world and created many nations (Whites? Yes. Jews? No.)
Had many kings (Whites? Yes. Jews? No.)
Have been a great blessing to the world (Whites? Yes, by creating almost every invention you can possibly think of; and thereby making the world a better place for everyone, not just themselves. Jews? No.)
Also ...
The 7th Commandment (adultery) has several meanings in the original Hebrew. It means a married woman having sex with a man who is not her husband -- both the other man and the married woman commit adultery. It also means misegenation (race mixing).
These are the aspects of the original scripture that modern pastors are not taught, and therefore do not preach.
Yes. Under this interpretation of the flood, which is a plausible one, it would certainly not follow that all humanity is from Ham, Shem, or Japheth.
That interpretation would make my comments on all humanity being descended from Noah incorrect and your statements fully consistent.
It doesn't strike me as being in the realm of takes that are acceptable as certain (of which I also have my share), but it’s a valid take that I hadn’t previously considered and thank you for.
By the by, you keep mentioning hook noses, but Harrison Ford, Billy Crystal, Topher Grace / Mila Kunis, Katie Sagal, Richard Dreyfuss, Eliot Spitzer, etc don’t have them at all.
In Hebrew, the word "arab" means "mixed." You can see that arabs look like a mixture of races, as opposed to Whites or Africans.
Likewise, jews are a mixed race.
"Jew" is not from a Hebrew word. It was made-up because something had to be used to describe those people who lived in the Roman province of Judea during Christ's time, and who claimed to be of Israelite heritage (via Judah), but lied about it.
... the blasphemy of them which say they are [Judahites], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. -- Rev 2:9
I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are [Judahites], and are not, but do lie; -- Rev 3:9
The word "Jew" was invented as an English word -- more than 1,000 years later -- to describe these people, and that is why it is in the modern versions of the Bible.
Although they are a mixed race (Kenites, Caananites, Edomites), the mixture is not the same for all of them, due to who had sex with whom over the millennia. Many also mixed with Whites, giving them a more White appearance.
The Edomites are a good example. The jews themselves admit that Edomites are "within jewry." Esau/Edom was originally an Adamite and Shemite ("semite") since his father was Isaac. But he was never an Israelite, because Jacob/Israel was his brother, not his ancestor.
When Esau's name was changed to Edom, his descendents became the Edomites. Esau/Edom mixed with Caananites and his descendents also mixed with Kenites. So, the Edomites, who the jews admit in their internal writings that they are, were a mixed group to begin with, and some of that mixture was with the White Adamites.
Also, some famous people might possibly be jew by religious conversion, but not by ethnicity (such as Ivanka Trump).
If Genesis 4:15 refers to the hook nose, then those today who have that physical trait are most likely of a mixture that is heavy towards the Cain branch of their family tree, while others have less of that part of the mixture.
It is interesting to note that the cartoons/memes of the conniving jew is almost always of the hook nose variety. Perhaps that lineage is the most conniving and destructive within society ("Adversary" = "Satan" in the original Hebrew), and the others not as much.
Lots of good details, and some plausible theory, but still doesn’t tie in the nose well, and Soros’ nose is quite normal, as are Bezos’, the Rothschilds’, and many other of who strike me as definitely being among the guilty class.
I can’t actually think of any well known conniver with a hooked nose offhand. Spielberg, maybe?
It seems either I wrote my post with some awkward wording, or you misunderstood some of my points, because I tend to agree or at least not be in disagreement with a good portion of what you wrote, with some quibbles on a few points here and there (which is to be expected at a minimum, given the number of lies we’ve been fed).
Will try to clarify later if I have time, but I deleted my post after penisse deleted his for whatever reason.
The interesting one was on the flood. “Was it global as we’ve been taught or more localized?”
It was a local flood, not worldwide.
It did not wipe out other people (or animals) in the world.
There are contemporaneous historical accounts elsewhere in the world that did not report a great flood in their area of the world. So, it could not have been worldwide.
The Hebrew word has been mistranslated to "world" or "earth" when it means "land." The land was flooded, to wipe out the people who were wicked.
The reason they were wicked is because they had become corrupted by mixing with the Satanic lineage.
Have you ever considered what God's First Law was?
It is right there in Genesis 1:1.
"Kind after kind."
God creates, and He expects His creation to remain of the same kind. Only humans have the free will to disobey. And many Adamites did by mixing with non-Adamites (Kenites -- of Cain, primarily, but they eventually created other race mixes, as well, none of whom were of God's creation).
This is the true meaning of the 5th Commandment: Honor Thy Father and Thy Mother.
This is usually thought of to mean to respect your parents. But what if your parents are assholes? What if they are abusive? What if they are wicked? Why should they be honored?
I think the true meaning is to honor ALL of your ancestors. Not just your parents, but your grandparents, great grandparents, going all the way back.
And the way you do this is "kind after kind."
Again, the Bible is a story about the family tree of Adam. The Commandments are directed at the Israelites, who are part of that family tree.
The 5th Commandment tells THEM not to race mix outside of their race.
THIS is why God flooded the land, to wipe out all those who had violated His Law.
Jude 1:7:
What is "strange flesh?" It is race mixing.
It's not that the other races are bad, per se. It's just that they are other races, and not of the same race. Not kind after kind, and therefore a violation of God's Law.
The Bible is the story of the family tree of Adam, and how his descendants are supposed to live. These people are the Adamites. A subset of them became the Israelites, who eventually migrated to the Caucasus mountain region, and then into Europe, becoming known as the Caucasians.
It should not be suprising, then, that the influences of Hollywood, media, etc. are trying to convince White people to race mix, but they don't want it in Israel.
Do a Google search (use Google.com, as distasteful as that is) and search the term "happy white woman," click on images, and tell me what images you see. Who controls Google? Who did I say that the Bible tells us were descended from Cain, among others? Who was Cain the son of? What is Satan (the "Adversary" in Hebrew)? What does Revelation 12:7-9 tells us that the archangel Michael did to Satan in heaven?
It ALL makes sense when you look at it from this perspective. The Bible makes sense (OT and NT work in unison). History makes sense. What is going on in our world today makes sense.
If you think about the "Chosen People," and the covenant God gave to Abraham, then Isaac, then Jacob/Israel, all of these promises have been fulfilled by the White Europeans, and no one else in history:
Also ...
The 7th Commandment (adultery) has several meanings in the original Hebrew. It means a married woman having sex with a man who is not her husband -- both the other man and the married woman commit adultery. It also means misegenation (race mixing).
These are the aspects of the original scripture that modern pastors are not taught, and therefore do not preach.
Yes. Under this interpretation of the flood, which is a plausible one, it would certainly not follow that all humanity is from Ham, Shem, or Japheth.
That interpretation would make my comments on all humanity being descended from Noah incorrect and your statements fully consistent.
It doesn't strike me as being in the realm of takes that are acceptable as certain (of which I also have my share), but it’s a valid take that I hadn’t previously considered and thank you for.
By the by, you keep mentioning hook noses, but Harrison Ford, Billy Crystal, Topher Grace / Mila Kunis, Katie Sagal, Richard Dreyfuss, Eliot Spitzer, etc don’t have them at all.
Explanation?
I can't say for sure. My hunch is this:
That particular race of people is a mixed race.
In Hebrew, the word "arab" means "mixed." You can see that arabs look like a mixture of races, as opposed to Whites or Africans.
Likewise, jews are a mixed race.
"Jew" is not from a Hebrew word. It was made-up because something had to be used to describe those people who lived in the Roman province of Judea during Christ's time, and who claimed to be of Israelite heritage (via Judah), but lied about it.
The word "Jew" was invented as an English word -- more than 1,000 years later -- to describe these people, and that is why it is in the modern versions of the Bible.
Although they are a mixed race (Kenites, Caananites, Edomites), the mixture is not the same for all of them, due to who had sex with whom over the millennia. Many also mixed with Whites, giving them a more White appearance.
The Edomites are a good example. The jews themselves admit that Edomites are "within jewry." Esau/Edom was originally an Adamite and Shemite ("semite") since his father was Isaac. But he was never an Israelite, because Jacob/Israel was his brother, not his ancestor.
When Esau's name was changed to Edom, his descendents became the Edomites. Esau/Edom mixed with Caananites and his descendents also mixed with Kenites. So, the Edomites, who the jews admit in their internal writings that they are, were a mixed group to begin with, and some of that mixture was with the White Adamites.
Also, some famous people might possibly be jew by religious conversion, but not by ethnicity (such as Ivanka Trump).
If Genesis 4:15 refers to the hook nose, then those today who have that physical trait are most likely of a mixture that is heavy towards the Cain branch of their family tree, while others have less of that part of the mixture.
It is interesting to note that the cartoons/memes of the conniving jew is almost always of the hook nose variety. Perhaps that lineage is the most conniving and destructive within society ("Adversary" = "Satan" in the original Hebrew), and the others not as much.
Lots of good details, and some plausible theory, but still doesn’t tie in the nose well, and Soros’ nose is quite normal, as are Bezos’, the Rothschilds’, and many other of who strike me as definitely being among the guilty class.
I can’t actually think of any well known conniver with a hooked nose offhand. Spielberg, maybe?