There is no defense without an offensive force. I think anon was simply implying that in the "public" eye, it is for defense - to justify having it (space tech) what with "rules" and "laws" and sanctions and that whole web of BS. Perhaps I'm also an r-tard that needs to sit in time out today and gather my thoughts.
There is no defense without an offensive force. I think anon was simply implying that in the "public" eye, it is for defense - to justify having it (space tech) what with "rules" and "laws" and sanctions and that whole web of BS. Perhaps I'm also an r-tard that needs to sit in time out today and gather my thoughts.
That made me laugh, thanks