It's not a false image. It was the created reality at that moment in time of creation. But there are theories of how the Flood really changed a lot of geography. Look into it. I'm not sure, but I think there is a website that might have some answers: answersingenesis.com.
Great way of saying it is a false image, but not a false image. Erosion doesn't count?
I'm open to a good theory on the Grand Canyon, but however quickly it was formed does not prove any argument that the Earth is not as old as it seems. Quick events can occur in the context of a long time frame.
If you do not believe God to be a liar, than you should be on the same page as me. The bible is God's word and God's word has earth at about 6000 years old.
It never said that in the Bible. It is an inference made by mortal men, so if you would rather believe mortal men than what is in God's Word (the Creation), good luck.
What a lot of people misunderstand is that God's Word was first manifested in the Creation (as a work of Christ, also "the Word"). The Bible came long after the events recorded in it. I don't subscribe to any conflict between Creation and the Bible, but I simply do not believe that mortal men can divine facts from the Bible that are not stated in the Bible. Or that their interpretations of the Bible (His Word) are superior to quantitative understanding of the Creation (His Word).
No, Adam was fully formed (age = 0), intended to live indefinitely. God's Word (Creation) is not a lie. He has given us the intellect to read it (science).
Chicken or the egg? You cannot answer that. I feel like the reason we perceive time is because our brains would short circuit because of the vastness of God's creation.
Also, that was a bit disrespectful. You may think it's nonsense, but you cannot disprove my statement. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you gotta be an ass.
I'm sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about. I've seen Kaua'i more than once. Far more erosion than 6,000 years.
Assuming that it wasn't just created that way.
I don't subscribe to the hypothesis that God is a liar and creates false images of reality.
It's not a false image. It was the created reality at that moment in time of creation. But there are theories of how the Flood really changed a lot of geography. Look into it. I'm not sure, but I think there is a website that might have some answers: answersingenesis.com.
Great way of saying it is a false image, but not a false image. Erosion doesn't count?
I'm open to a good theory on the Grand Canyon, but however quickly it was formed does not prove any argument that the Earth is not as old as it seems. Quick events can occur in the context of a long time frame.
If you do not believe God to be a liar, than you should be on the same page as me. The bible is God's word and God's word has earth at about 6000 years old.
It never said that in the Bible. It is an inference made by mortal men, so if you would rather believe mortal men than what is in God's Word (the Creation), good luck.
What a lot of people misunderstand is that God's Word was first manifested in the Creation (as a work of Christ, also "the Word"). The Bible came long after the events recorded in it. I don't subscribe to any conflict between Creation and the Bible, but I simply do not believe that mortal men can divine facts from the Bible that are not stated in the Bible. Or that their interpretations of the Bible (His Word) are superior to quantitative understanding of the Creation (His Word).
Created with age is a thing. Adam was 33 at Creation. Trees were full size. Chicken before the egg. Go to ICR.org.
No, Adam was fully formed (age = 0), intended to live indefinitely. God's Word (Creation) is not a lie. He has given us the intellect to read it (science).
Time is an illusion. Everything happens simultaneously.
So which came first? Your birth or your death? You might want to give up saying nonsensical things.
Chicken or the egg? You cannot answer that. I feel like the reason we perceive time is because our brains would short circuit because of the vastness of God's creation.
Also, that was a bit disrespectful. You may think it's nonsense, but you cannot disprove my statement. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you gotta be an ass.
heard about that site a few weeks ago on the radio; talking about how oil is made, then I forgot to look it up. thanks for the reminder🕵️