If you study the various scenarios that the folks touting the PS are laying out, then these people are building their shelters in the wrong places. You certainly wouldn't be building on top of a volcanic island chain like Hawaii. Same with New Zealand.
So it's my opinion only that these shelters are not being built for a Polar Shift, but more likely to hide from the villagers when they come for their heads.
Regarding Hawaii, you have to understand that the island chain was formed by the underlying crustal plate moving over a deeper magma hot spot. Midway Island was the first, working down to Kaua'i, O'ahu, Moloka'i, Maui, and the big island of Hawai'i. A new island is building to the southeast of Hawai'i. Once the plate moves an island off the hot spot, the volcanoes go extinct and remain so. The big island is 0.4 million years old, but Kaua'i is 5 million years old.
Bottom line: If Zuckerberg builds on an older island, that would be ideal to NOT experience volcanism.
I take no issue over the wisdom of any such construction. It looks to me like an affliction (or fad) of the wealthy who have anxiety problems.
That could definitely be a problem, along with typhoons. The south coast of Kaua'i had a nice enclave of beachside hotels at Poipu Beach in the 1980s. There was a serious typhoon. When I revisited a decade later, the hotels we stayed in were abandoned ruins, off limits to passers-by. Quite a shame.
However, that is always the problem with frontage on the Pacific Ocean. No easier for California, Oregon, Washington, or Alaska. Not to mention earthquakes (e.g., Anchorage in 1964).
There's not nearly enough elevation to survive the polar shift in the move of the ocean. I think a lot of people are commenting and not actually looking at the videos with the maps. Let me find those postings. Seeing the maps changed my perspective completely. Granted that's just one model but you can apply intuition and logic
If you study the various scenarios that the folks touting the PS are laying out, then these people are building their shelters in the wrong places. You certainly wouldn't be building on top of a volcanic island chain like Hawaii. Same with New Zealand.
So it's my opinion only that these shelters are not being built for a Polar Shift, but more likely to hide from the villagers when they come for their heads.
Regarding Hawaii, you have to understand that the island chain was formed by the underlying crustal plate moving over a deeper magma hot spot. Midway Island was the first, working down to Kaua'i, O'ahu, Moloka'i, Maui, and the big island of Hawai'i. A new island is building to the southeast of Hawai'i. Once the plate moves an island off the hot spot, the volcanoes go extinct and remain so. The big island is 0.4 million years old, but Kaua'i is 5 million years old.
Bottom line: If Zuckerberg builds on an older island, that would be ideal to NOT experience volcanism.
I take no issue over the wisdom of any such construction. It looks to me like an affliction (or fad) of the wealthy who have anxiety problems.
You make a good point and I think it's correct. One thing I would not be too excited about on Hawaii is the possibility of tsunamis.
That could definitely be a problem, along with typhoons. The south coast of Kaua'i had a nice enclave of beachside hotels at Poipu Beach in the 1980s. There was a serious typhoon. When I revisited a decade later, the hotels we stayed in were abandoned ruins, off limits to passers-by. Quite a shame.
However, that is always the problem with frontage on the Pacific Ocean. No easier for California, Oregon, Washington, or Alaska. Not to mention earthquakes (e.g., Anchorage in 1964).
There's not nearly enough elevation to survive the polar shift in the move of the ocean. I think a lot of people are commenting and not actually looking at the videos with the maps. Let me find those postings. Seeing the maps changed my perspective completely. Granted that's just one model but you can apply intuition and logic