Regarding Hawaii, you have to understand that the island chain was formed by the underlying crustal plate moving over a deeper magma hot spot. Midway Island was the first, working down to Kaua'i, O'ahu, Moloka'i, Maui, and the big island of Hawai'i. A new island is building to the southeast of Hawai'i. Once the plate moves an island off the hot spot, the volcanoes go extinct and remain so. The big island is 0.4 million years old, but Kaua'i is 5 million years old.
Bottom line: If Zuckerberg builds on an older island, that would be ideal to NOT experience volcanism.
I take no issue over the wisdom of any such construction. It looks to me like an affliction (or fad) of the wealthy who have anxiety problems.
No, Adam was fully formed (age = 0), intended to live indefinitely. God's Word (Creation) is not a lie. He has given us the intellect to read it (science).
could be indeed. i am learning, and evidence in nature would kinda support it, that we are seeing a cycle possibly come to fruition in our lifetime. we've been around for a short time imho. no denying that rock we live on was created. by a creator. in what manner is the question. it's hard to be a deep believer of the bible (in it's "current form" which is a whole other thing) and be able to observe the world without 'expanding out thinking.' I'm guessing these cycles have been occurring many times over... does the current time derive from our creator? I don't know. just trying to expand my thinking.
Oh, and you were there to bear witness? Or who was? You do know there are stars we observe that are farther away than 10,000 light-years? They had to exist that long ago in order for their light to arrive today. And that's not the farthest distance we observe, either.
That could definitely be a problem, along with typhoons. The south coast of Kaua'i had a nice enclave of beachside hotels at Poipu Beach in the 1980s. There was a serious typhoon. When I revisited a decade later, the hotels we stayed in were abandoned ruins, off limits to passers-by. Quite a shame.
However, that is always the problem with frontage on the Pacific Ocean. No easier for California, Oregon, Washington, or Alaska. Not to mention earthquakes (e.g., Anchorage in 1964).
There's not nearly enough elevation to survive the polar shift in the move of the ocean. I think a lot of people are commenting and not actually looking at the videos with the maps. Let me find those postings. Seeing the maps changed my perspective completely. Granted that's just one model but you can apply intuition and logic
I prefer to apply physics and mathematics, neither of which I have seen in reference to a supposed event that may be entirely subterranean. The magnetic pole has been wandering about in historical times, yet we simply don't notice it. The Earth's rotational pole (angular momentum vector) will not change; there is no torque to change it.
Regarding Hawaii, you have to understand that the island chain was formed by the underlying crustal plate moving over a deeper magma hot spot. Midway Island was the first, working down to Kaua'i, O'ahu, Moloka'i, Maui, and the big island of Hawai'i. A new island is building to the southeast of Hawai'i. Once the plate moves an island off the hot spot, the volcanoes go extinct and remain so. The big island is 0.4 million years old, but Kaua'i is 5 million years old.
Bottom line: If Zuckerberg builds on an older island, that would be ideal to NOT experience volcanism.
I take no issue over the wisdom of any such construction. It looks to me like an affliction (or fad) of the wealthy who have anxiety problems.
at most it's about 6000 years old.
I'm sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about. I've seen Kaua'i more than once. Far more erosion than 6,000 years.
Assuming that it wasn't just created that way.
I don't subscribe to the hypothesis that God is a liar and creates false images of reality.
Created with age is a thing. Adam was 33 at Creation. Trees were full size. Chicken before the egg. Go to ICR.org.
No, Adam was fully formed (age = 0), intended to live indefinitely. God's Word (Creation) is not a lie. He has given us the intellect to read it (science).
Time is an illusion. Everything happens simultaneously.
heard about that site a few weeks ago on the radio; talking about how oil is made, then I forgot to look it up. thanks for the reminder🕵️
Less than 10,000 years old…. Millions of years is another lie.
could be indeed. i am learning, and evidence in nature would kinda support it, that we are seeing a cycle possibly come to fruition in our lifetime. we've been around for a short time imho. no denying that rock we live on was created. by a creator. in what manner is the question. it's hard to be a deep believer of the bible (in it's "current form" which is a whole other thing) and be able to observe the world without 'expanding out thinking.' I'm guessing these cycles have been occurring many times over... does the current time derive from our creator? I don't know. just trying to expand my thinking.
Oh, and you were there to bear witness? Or who was? You do know there are stars we observe that are farther away than 10,000 light-years? They had to exist that long ago in order for their light to arrive today. And that's not the farthest distance we observe, either.
You make a good point and I think it's correct. One thing I would not be too excited about on Hawaii is the possibility of tsunamis.
That could definitely be a problem, along with typhoons. The south coast of Kaua'i had a nice enclave of beachside hotels at Poipu Beach in the 1980s. There was a serious typhoon. When I revisited a decade later, the hotels we stayed in were abandoned ruins, off limits to passers-by. Quite a shame.
However, that is always the problem with frontage on the Pacific Ocean. No easier for California, Oregon, Washington, or Alaska. Not to mention earthquakes (e.g., Anchorage in 1964).
There's not nearly enough elevation to survive the polar shift in the move of the ocean. I think a lot of people are commenting and not actually looking at the videos with the maps. Let me find those postings. Seeing the maps changed my perspective completely. Granted that's just one model but you can apply intuition and logic
I prefer to apply physics and mathematics, neither of which I have seen in reference to a supposed event that may be entirely subterranean. The magnetic pole has been wandering about in historical times, yet we simply don't notice it. The Earth's rotational pole (angular momentum vector) will not change; there is no torque to change it.