Kievan RUS. I.e. russian. Not kievan urkork or something.
jewkraine is a construct. You actually know what ukraine means in russian. Border lands. Who names the country 'border lands'. Nobody, that's who. Because it's a lie.
As I said, your entire 'country' is a lie. But this is what zionists do. Just as they claim Hannibal was black, ancient egyptians were black etc etc.
They do similar things when they constuct 'countries' by brainwashing populations. it's an old trick.
Your basic argument is that you're the real russians, which you now call ukrainians, instead of the 'other' russians from Moscow.
Well, guess what, there were no ukrainians at the time. There were russians from different cities/areas. But they were called RUSSIANS, not ukainians.
Jewkraine is a construct, specifically constructed by zionists for strife, division and...war. As you see right now.
This is some incredibly interesting history. I would love to make time to learn about this entire area & history from some of the original sources.
Many on this forum think they are fully educated, instead of being willing to dig in & determine what is the reality of the situation.
Ultimately it seems like leadership in Ukraine has been infiltrated by what many call here the Khazarian Mafia. I have no been able to confirm this, though there is plenty of evidence that points to it.
Now you offer up some regional historical context, which I believe should be examined & put into or against the other evidences available to determine what is really happening.
Ultimately I see this as a destruction of those who refused to accept NAZI control with the wars happening for the past couple decades, & now Putin has come in to try & clean it up with the need to salvage & protect those oil pipelines.
I feel terrible for the every day person in that entire region, and elsewhere in the world, that is shoved into war because some other foreigner wants control & money flow.
I pray for your family still over there & hope that they can come out of this devastating mess on top.
Thank you for the regional context. When these are left out, history & context are too easily removed.
As enjoyable as the debate above was, this is a much better response.
If JulesVerne’s comments are earnest (no offense, but we can’t know that, nor can you know if I’m earnest, for that matter), the response was, maybe not the greatest choice of tone.
Random fun fact on Nixon, in honor of the 33 American biolabs within Ukraine’s borders… [they] also hated him because he shut down the USG’s National offensive biowarfare research at Fort Detrich, where they had been experimenting on seventh day adventists who were conscientious objectors to Vietnam.
I’m sure [they] got rid of it. What were they planning before that?
Choice of tone really needs to be considered on this board as this is the first place most will come for exposure to Q ideas.
We must be conscientious of where new readers are coming from mentally/in mindset. I don't think we need to skirt any issue, though any information can be recieved easily with the proper tone. It may not be information the reader agrees with, but the tone makes it paletable.
u/suleo wrote: "And in reality your county never existed before 1991. It's made up. Sorry."
You are brainwashed.
In 998, Grand Prince Vladimir of Kyievan Rus brought Christianity to Ukraine. Back then, Moscow was just a swamp land paying taxes to the Turkish Han.
In 1147, Prince Yuri Dolgorukiy, son of Grand Prince of Kyiv Vladimir II Monomakh, built Moscow.
In 1654, Bohdan Khmelnytsky united Ukraine with Russia. You probably never heard about him. Learn some history.
Kek.
Kievan RUS. I.e. russian. Not kievan urkork or something.
jewkraine is a construct. You actually know what ukraine means in russian. Border lands. Who names the country 'border lands'. Nobody, that's who. Because it's a lie.
As I said, your entire 'country' is a lie. But this is what zionists do. Just as they claim Hannibal was black, ancient egyptians were black etc etc.
They do similar things when they constuct 'countries' by brainwashing populations. it's an old trick.
Your basic argument is that you're the real russians, which you now call ukrainians, instead of the 'other' russians from Moscow.
Well, guess what, there were no ukrainians at the time. There were russians from different cities/areas. But they were called RUSSIANS, not ukainians.
Jewkraine is a construct, specifically constructed by zionists for strife, division and...war. As you see right now.
u/suleo wrote: "your entire 'life' is a lie"
You did not even address my historical arguments. Socrates, how should I respond to him?
Socrates: "When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers."
Socrates was a pederast.
"Insult me for molesting young boys all you want you're just a slanderous bigot" Fucking sounds familiar.
This is some incredibly interesting history. I would love to make time to learn about this entire area & history from some of the original sources.
Many on this forum think they are fully educated, instead of being willing to dig in & determine what is the reality of the situation.
Ultimately it seems like leadership in Ukraine has been infiltrated by what many call here the Khazarian Mafia. I have no been able to confirm this, though there is plenty of evidence that points to it.
Now you offer up some regional historical context, which I believe should be examined & put into or against the other evidences available to determine what is really happening.
Ultimately I see this as a destruction of those who refused to accept NAZI control with the wars happening for the past couple decades, & now Putin has come in to try & clean it up with the need to salvage & protect those oil pipelines.
I feel terrible for the every day person in that entire region, and elsewhere in the world, that is shoved into war because some other foreigner wants control & money flow.
I pray for your family still over there & hope that they can come out of this devastating mess on top.
Thank you for the regional context. When these are left out, history & context are too easily removed.
As enjoyable as the debate above was, this is a much better response.
If JulesVerne’s comments are earnest (no offense, but we can’t know that, nor can you know if I’m earnest, for that matter), the response was, maybe not the greatest choice of tone.
Random fun fact on Nixon, in honor of the 33 American biolabs within Ukraine’s borders… [they] also hated him because he shut down the USG’s National offensive biowarfare research at Fort Detrich, where they had been experimenting on seventh day adventists who were conscientious objectors to Vietnam.
I’m sure [they] got rid of it. What were they planning before that?
After?
u/#mikeyep
Thank you.
Choice of tone really needs to be considered on this board as this is the first place most will come for exposure to Q ideas.
We must be conscientious of where new readers are coming from mentally/in mindset. I don't think we need to skirt any issue, though any information can be recieved easily with the proper tone. It may not be information the reader agrees with, but the tone makes it paletable.
Yep!
Downdoots show up on the weirdest posts sometimes!