The Supreme Court has denied Special Counsel Smith's request for an expedited review of the case against Trump. - The Great Awakening

The Supreme Court has denied Special Counsel Smith's request for an expedited review of the case against Trump. (twitter.com) OH NO! ANYWAY

posted 327 days ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid 327 days ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid +219 / -0

27 comments

27 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (27)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– Moosemeadow 5 points 327 days ago +5 / -0

Who gave Smith super powers to go after a private citizen? ***** Supreme Court case against Smith

page 31, CONCLUSION Not clothed in the authority of the federal govern- ment, Smith is a modern example of the naked em- peror. Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos. That fact is sufficient to sink Smith’s petition, and the Court should deny review. We express no views on the merits issues addressed in Smith’s unauthorized petition https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf ****

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– LordKekingtonEsquire 2 points 327 days ago +2 / -0

OH MY KEK

THEY ACTUALLY SAID THAT.

HOLY KEKKING FUCK.

LMAOOOOOOO. I AM DEAD!!! BIG W SCOTUS

u/#spitcoffee

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– lithopedion 5 points 327 days ago +5 / -0

SCOTUS didn't say that, Trump's lawyers did

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– dec3169 2 points 327 days ago +2 / -0

Neither said that. Read the first page.

BRIEF OF FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL EDWIN MEESE III AND LAW PROFESSORS STEVEN G. CALABRESI AND GARY S. LAWSON AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING NEITHER PARTY

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q