Think about it, guys!
Why would Tucker ever interview Kevin Spacey?
Why would Tucker ever platform a pedophile?
Why would Kevin Spacey run for President?
Why does his voice sound auto-tuned?
It should be pretty obvious the the astute and well-trained eye that this is an obvious deepfake, and a very pointed one at that.
What is Tucker trying to teach us?
Surely, Tucker is trying to say "Hey, I got you, or almost did. See how easy that was? Now, what about the lying fake news media that is the propaganda arm of the Marxist-Satanist Democrat Party?
With the Epstein list fit to officially drop any day now (it seems), we will certainly be seeing unprecedented damage control and propaganda. The sheep will also screech and wail because all of their celebrities and their highly-favored Obama will be there.
Then come the false flags. How many have we seen every time they couldn't cover up a story fast enough?
Be vigilant. Pay attention! Tucker is trying to tell us something here!
Don't get distracted.
Q4963 (excerpt)
Focus.
FOCUS.
-Q
NCSWIC! Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good night!
God will everyone just watch House of Cards already so they stop sounding so stupid?
i always thought that the Underwood’s were based on the Clinton’s
100%. They give themselves some deniability by placing them in South Carolina instead of Arkansas but the parallels are undeniable. If you fuck with the Underwoods (Clintons), you die.
and then they gave hrc a cameo appearance
maybe because we choose not to be apprised of all the pop culture. please enlighten us as to what's so obvious if we were HOC sycophants. is there any chance that HOC is a designed prerequisite to this latest Tucker interview such that you'd have the exact response to it that they want?
I'm glad you asked. The point is obvious for anyone who has seen the show, and that point is told to us plainly by Spacy (playing Underwood) the moment he looks into the camera and speaks to the watchers of the interview directly, rather than to Tucker.
On the show, every time Underwood looks into the camera and breaks that fourth wall, he tells the unmitigated truth about his feelings and intentions regardless of what he's saying or doing in relation to the other characters in the show. He's a reliable narrator because he has no reason to believe that those of us watching at home, clearly froma different universe than his character exists in, has any power whatsoever to thwart the plans he has, so he has no reason not to be honest. If anything, he revels in the chance to be honest because it's a chance to show us how smart he is and dumb he thinks all the people he deals with on this show who aren't aware of our existence are.
Deadpool is actually this kind of character. The movies don't capture it well it's just used for comic relief, but in the comics, Deadpool is actually aware that he's a comic book character, and he has the same knowledge of other comic book characters, even those not in the DC Universe, that the reader, but not the other DC characters, would be aware of. This allows him to play two games: he can converse with the characters in the comics, but he can tell inside jokes the other characters would never get because he's sharing them with us for our benefit and not for theirs.
When Frank Underwood looks into the camera in this interview and says quite plainly "Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see" THAT'S the point. He's being a reliable narrator. He's uttering a critical truth. And the conversation that has swirled around the video ever since its release drives home his point: AI and deep fake technology and sinister political forces around the world (that he, when he's not looking at the camera, represents, as a fork-tongued liar who says whatever he needs to get elected but inwardly is a ravenous wolf--this meta commentary driven even deeper by the fact that Spacy in real life IS in fact a ravenous wolf) have made it so that WE MUST ACTIVATE OUR CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IF WE'RE GOING TO SEE THROUGH THE BULLSHIT TO THE TRUTH.
And wouldn't you know it? That's exactly what this video accomplished. Look at all the comments and questions people have made and asked about it. People can't help it. It seems too strange.
"Is this real?"
"Is this a deep fake?"
"Why would Tucker sit down with Spacy?"
"Why is Spacy talking like that?"
"Is Spacy playing a character or is he really running for President?"
Now, friend, who else that we know of is fond of using this Socratic method to get other people to think critically?
I see this video as a primer of sorts. A "Q-lite" exercise to prime the masses who are yet unfamiliar with Q to start questioning everything they see on TV. It's MASTERFUL.