I don’t know but I’ve always thought he was a whipping boy for Charles- I think Andrew was involved with JE but the media full court press on it has always been a red flag to me? We know media ignores stories they don’t want to cover so why would they focus on one of their own? Unless it was to show that they can? To pressure the crown in some way? I’ve always wondered if Charles is the real target of the coverage and Andrew’s media storm was more to show him what could happen??
I’ve always wondered if Charles is the real target of the coverage
This is it right here. Andrew is being thrown under the bus to protect Charles, who is now king, in hopes that if Andrew is taken down we won't look any higher.
If you want to know what Charles is really about, do a search on his bestest pal Jimmy Savile. It's disturbing and vile and the press hushes it up.
Charles has also been a big supporter of the flood of Muslims that are now destroying British/Celtic culture all throughout the UK. He's a weak and depraved individual and seems quite happy to reign over the fall of his own kingdom.
Even saville is another that makes me question because again there was huge media coverage- Netflix documentaries etc whereas other stories like the Clinton’s holidaying at epsteins zorro ranch every year were glossed over and memory holed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the info about Jimmy Saville start coming out around the same time that the news that the UK police and government were covering for the Pakistani rape gangs was bubbling to the surface?
I think this includes the current farce by Harry and his yacht girl wife. I think they're being paid to run interference and generate sympathy for the Monarchy.
The royals (UK and all the inbred fucks across Europe) have far bigger pedo problems than Epstein. Epstein is just the method used to begin the process of awakening the people to it.
I don’t know but I’ve always thought he was a whipping boy for Charles- I think Andrew was involved with JE but the media full court press on it has always been a red flag to me? We know media ignores stories they don’t want to cover so why would they focus on one of their own? Unless it was to show that they can? To pressure the crown in some way? I’ve always wondered if Charles is the real target of the coverage and Andrew’s media storm was more to show him what could happen??
This is it right here. Andrew is being thrown under the bus to protect Charles, who is now king, in hopes that if Andrew is taken down we won't look any higher.
If you want to know what Charles is really about, do a search on his bestest pal Jimmy Savile. It's disturbing and vile and the press hushes it up.
Charles has also been a big supporter of the flood of Muslims that are now destroying British/Celtic culture all throughout the UK. He's a weak and depraved individual and seems quite happy to reign over the fall of his own kingdom.
Even saville is another that makes me question because again there was huge media coverage- Netflix documentaries etc whereas other stories like the Clinton’s holidaying at epsteins zorro ranch every year were glossed over and memory holed.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7748467/Bill-Hillary-Clinton-frequent-guests-Jeffrey-Epsteins-New-Mexico-ranch.html
My loose rule of thumb is if the media is blowing it up then question why and what they are distracting from??
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the info about Jimmy Saville start coming out around the same time that the news that the UK police and government were covering for the Pakistani rape gangs was bubbling to the surface?
You may be right there
I think this includes the current farce by Harry and his yacht girl wife. I think they're being paid to run interference and generate sympathy for the Monarchy.
He also is a descendant of blood drinking vampires.
The royals (UK and all the inbred fucks across Europe) have far bigger pedo problems than Epstein. Epstein is just the method used to begin the process of awakening the people to it.