The book Magic of Money by Hajalmar Schaacht is also recommended reading for those digging into Hitler. Amongst other things, it sheds light on who funded Hitler, when did they drop him, what was Hitler's solution to Jews (allowing them to migrate to where ever they wanted, with all their assets repatriated in 2-3 years) and who vetoed it (The head rabbi in London) and why (They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else). Additionally, this book sheds much light on the trickeries of central banks (even though the author, Hitler's Central Banker, does not present them as such, but rather states them as mundane inner workings of central banks).
Another good dig is Rudolph Hess and his mission to UK for a peace treaty and what happened to him.
Declaration of wars in WW2 is another red pill. Germany declares war on only one country in 1939. In return 15 countries declare war on Germany. So exactly who started the world war?
Having said all this, there is no doubt that the NWO is Nazi World Order. And we have seen Nazis are indeed the evil people we have always been told, as during the Ukraine war we say it play out in front of us.
Here is a very good first hand account of Nazis being flown into US by Col. Prouty - btw, he has tons of videos that are all highly informative, and mostly first hand accounts, since he had front row seat during the post WW2 years.
It would lead one to believe that Hitler, perhaps foiled the plans for Nazis, and hence had to be eliminated while Nazis were folded into the Western Empire to extend the plan of world domination by another 60 years.
And finally, looking at the demise of Hitler and his campaign into USSR, that historians have never been able to explain convincingly, was Hitler's invasion into USSR an act of ultimate sacrifice? Did Stalin and Hitler conspire to eliminate hundreds of thousands of Nazis and Commies at the same time? The fact that Stalin started purging the Cabal puppets after WW2, definitely adds credence to this claim.
Hitler's invasion into Soviet Union THROUGH UKRAINE appeared to be an intentional demolition of Ukraine, Khazarian homeland, and the fake Jews there. It looks to me like Stalin conscripted and forced the most diehard Communists into battle into Ukraine to "Defend the Motherland" slaughtering many of his enemies in the process. Then when the Soviet Union invaded Europe they went THROUGH UKRAINE to demolish it again. Most likely this was intentional. Unknown if Hitler and Stalin were working together to eliminate mutual enemies, but it sure looks that way.
Not saying either of these guys were good guys. They were going directly at the cabal using brute force. A clearly bloody and expensive way to do it with lots and lots of collateral damage.
Depopulation can be used against the cabal as well. Unoccupied land after a certain period of time can legally be claimed by whoever occupies it (international law). Two complete depopulation events in Ukraine within quick succession likely removed all possible Khazarian legal claims to the land. This is why they needed to illegally steal it again in 1991 by fraudulently breaking off the Ukraine S.S.R. and creating a fake country with the help of the media, U.N., and intelligence agencies. Note that the destruction during WW2 likely undid all the "gifts" Lenin made to the Khazarians of Ukrainian land 1917-1922.
Agreed. Also if you compare the White Christian genocide under Trotsky in 1920's vs the Ukrainian genocide after Stalin took over. How Stalin managed to get Lenin's vote of confidence before his death is probably one of the most powerful WH operation (pure speculation). Without this, all of the worst nightmares that were planned for the world under the umbrella of USSR would have come true.
Unknown if Hitler and Stalin were working together to eliminate mutual enemies, but it sure looks that way.
Makes the fact that Hitler and Stalin lived in Vienna for a few years within a few blocks of each other and visited the same cafe - all the more notable.
"They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else" What kind of insanity is allowed to be posted here? Israel didn't exist until AFTER the end of WWII. Perhaps you are referring to the region known as Palestine prior to creation of modern Israel?
Hess knew everything and was sent on a mission is why they - the western powers kept him Gagged - the sole inmate of Spandau for 46 years until he was murdered by British agents in 1989 after Gorbachev was putting calls out for his release.
I read a lengthy article some years back that tied everything together with witness statements that I will try to repost.
Good summary thanks, even though the Gorbachev part is new to me - but the timing fits. I get so mad whenever I read about Hess. Would love to read the article. Could be a powerful redpill regarding WW2 for older folks.
Thanks , I’ve just run a search for the article I pointed to but if you run search - Hess murdered there are now numerous independent articles on the Hess’s murder
Indeed. What amazes me is that the guy who left the wwar theatre in 1941 and spent the rest of the war imprisoned, and generally accepted to be 'crazy" was sentenced to life in prison.
So, I will write what I remember, but if you want the correct accurate story you gotta read the book I linked.
Hitler came up with a plan to allow Jews to leave Germany. They would leave with a certain percent of their assets, and the rest will be deposited with the bank in some scheme. For the next 2 or 3 years, they would be able to get a portion of the remaining assets every year, until they get the whole assets. Germany gets to keep the interest. Something like that. Its possible they would get back 90% instead of the whole 100%, but it was a very fair deal given the circumstances.
He proposes it to the president of the Reichsbank, his central banker, the author of the book. What does Schaacht do? He says he needs to get it approved by the president of the Central Bank of London.
This is where the redpill starts. He is able to get an immediate audience with the and flys out to meet him. Listening to the proposal the London bank president thinks this is pretty good deal, but he has to get it approved by the head Rabbi (I forget his name). Either one of them, or both of them meet with the Rabbi and ask for his approval. They are pretty flabbergasted when the Rabbi says that he cannot allow this as they don't want the jews immigrating to whereever they want. They are only allowed to leave to Israel.
That still doesn’t make any logical sense as to why the Bank of England (which I assume you mean) would need to approve anything and why Hitler wouldn’t do it anyway, just my opinion.
Jews needed an immigration visa into Palestine. Palestine was under League of Nations Mandate by the British. Hence, the need for a British issued immigration visum. And the Brits ended issuing immigration visa's to emigrating Jews in 1938, I belief.
And just as much there is AIPAC in America, there is a huge Jew-lobby in the UK. Hence the weight of the words of a London Rabbi.
But that doesn’t explain why Jews, facing a non-friendly (to say the least) government in Germany wouldn’t have happily migrated to a dozen other countries. Palestine/israel would have been far down the list. The idea that “a Rabbi” in London (especially considering that Judaism doesn’t have a central religious leader like the pope) seems to stretch credulity.
I am not so sure it was unfriendly. After the first window breaking called Crystal Nacht, which was a response to the Judean Boycott , emergency legislation was passed to stop it, otherwise the Haavara contract would not have been made.
There was even talk about using Madagascar as a Jewish Homeland as the previous deal with a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and TransJordan within the Arab League turned to nothing due to weak British action regarding the emergence of the Kingdom of Jordan.
So, I don't know. It may be considered hostile. On the other hand, having your own land and being boss there without Jew supremacy (Banking, News, Theater, Law, sciences, etc) is, based on the idea within that time frame of "every people have the right to choose their own destiny, not totally unreasonable.
And the Haavara deal was a deal that benefited both parties to the contract.
Of Kissinger it is said he fled Germany in 1938. The funny part is, emigration was positively viewed. And the details of the story show Kissinger went away with the blessing of the German Government. And they even worked with the Mossad precursor to achieve what was necessary.
The peace treaty of Versailles simply drew arbitrary lines on a map, in service of Empire building. And here we also find the root causes of dissension in many areas currently having to deal with political instability. It seems to me the IDEA, flowing from the sovereignty of every man and woman, that a people contain the highest form of sovereignty, and thus are perfectly set to choose their own destiny was not a bad idea.
Today this is replaced by a Rules based international order. The rules are made by the power structures behind this idea, running roughshod over the question of sovereignty of the people.
Some good resources for Anons who want to dig into Hitler. All of these are redpill material.
Hitler's suicide note is a very interesting read.
The book Magic of Money by Hajalmar Schaacht is also recommended reading for those digging into Hitler. Amongst other things, it sheds light on who funded Hitler, when did they drop him, what was Hitler's solution to Jews (allowing them to migrate to where ever they wanted, with all their assets repatriated in 2-3 years) and who vetoed it (The head rabbi in London) and why (They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else). Additionally, this book sheds much light on the trickeries of central banks (even though the author, Hitler's Central Banker, does not present them as such, but rather states them as mundane inner workings of central banks).
Another good dig is Rudolph Hess and his mission to UK for a peace treaty and what happened to him.
Hitler's Speech to Reichstag in Sep 1939
Declaration of wars in WW2 is another red pill. Germany declares war on only one country in 1939. In return 15 countries declare war on Germany. So exactly who started the world war?
Having said all this, there is no doubt that the NWO is Nazi World Order. And we have seen Nazis are indeed the evil people we have always been told, as during the Ukraine war we say it play out in front of us.
Here is a very good first hand account of Nazis being flown into US by Col. Prouty - btw, he has tons of videos that are all highly informative, and mostly first hand accounts, since he had front row seat during the post WW2 years.
It would lead one to believe that Hitler, perhaps foiled the plans for Nazis, and hence had to be eliminated while Nazis were folded into the Western Empire to extend the plan of world domination by another 60 years.
And finally, looking at the demise of Hitler and his campaign into USSR, that historians have never been able to explain convincingly, was Hitler's invasion into USSR an act of ultimate sacrifice? Did Stalin and Hitler conspire to eliminate hundreds of thousands of Nazis and Commies at the same time? The fact that Stalin started purging the Cabal puppets after WW2, definitely adds credence to this claim.
Hitler's invasion into Soviet Union THROUGH UKRAINE appeared to be an intentional demolition of Ukraine, Khazarian homeland, and the fake Jews there. It looks to me like Stalin conscripted and forced the most diehard Communists into battle into Ukraine to "Defend the Motherland" slaughtering many of his enemies in the process. Then when the Soviet Union invaded Europe they went THROUGH UKRAINE to demolish it again. Most likely this was intentional. Unknown if Hitler and Stalin were working together to eliminate mutual enemies, but it sure looks that way.
Not saying either of these guys were good guys. They were going directly at the cabal using brute force. A clearly bloody and expensive way to do it with lots and lots of collateral damage.
Depopulation can be used against the cabal as well. Unoccupied land after a certain period of time can legally be claimed by whoever occupies it (international law). Two complete depopulation events in Ukraine within quick succession likely removed all possible Khazarian legal claims to the land. This is why they needed to illegally steal it again in 1991 by fraudulently breaking off the Ukraine S.S.R. and creating a fake country with the help of the media, U.N., and intelligence agencies. Note that the destruction during WW2 likely undid all the "gifts" Lenin made to the Khazarians of Ukrainian land 1917-1922.
Agreed. Also if you compare the White Christian genocide under Trotsky in 1920's vs the Ukrainian genocide after Stalin took over. How Stalin managed to get Lenin's vote of confidence before his death is probably one of the most powerful WH operation (pure speculation). Without this, all of the worst nightmares that were planned for the world under the umbrella of USSR would have come true.
Makes the fact that Hitler and Stalin lived in Vienna for a few years within a few blocks of each other and visited the same cafe - all the more notable.
Ah ... Die Stammkneipe ....
It would certainly not surprise me.
"They wanted Hitler to allow Jews to leave only to Israel and nowhere else" What kind of insanity is allowed to be posted here? Israel didn't exist until AFTER the end of WWII. Perhaps you are referring to the region known as Palestine prior to creation of modern Israel?
Of course, I thought that much is obvious.
Hess knew everything and was sent on a mission is why they - the western powers kept him Gagged - the sole inmate of Spandau for 46 years until he was murdered by British agents in 1989 after Gorbachev was putting calls out for his release. I read a lengthy article some years back that tied everything together with witness statements that I will try to repost.
Good summary thanks, even though the Gorbachev part is new to me - but the timing fits. I get so mad whenever I read about Hess. Would love to read the article. Could be a powerful redpill regarding WW2 for older folks.
Thanks , I’ve just run a search for the article I pointed to but if you run search - Hess murdered there are now numerous independent articles on the Hess’s murder
Indeed. What amazes me is that the guy who left the wwar theatre in 1941 and spent the rest of the war imprisoned, and generally accepted to be 'crazy" was sentenced to life in prison.
How would a rabbi in London have the ability to “veto” an act by the nation of Germany?
So, I will write what I remember, but if you want the correct accurate story you gotta read the book I linked.
Hitler came up with a plan to allow Jews to leave Germany. They would leave with a certain percent of their assets, and the rest will be deposited with the bank in some scheme. For the next 2 or 3 years, they would be able to get a portion of the remaining assets every year, until they get the whole assets. Germany gets to keep the interest. Something like that. Its possible they would get back 90% instead of the whole 100%, but it was a very fair deal given the circumstances.
He proposes it to the president of the Reichsbank, his central banker, the author of the book. What does Schaacht do? He says he needs to get it approved by the president of the Central Bank of London.
This is where the redpill starts. He is able to get an immediate audience with the and flys out to meet him. Listening to the proposal the London bank president thinks this is pretty good deal, but he has to get it approved by the head Rabbi (I forget his name). Either one of them, or both of them meet with the Rabbi and ask for his approval. They are pretty flabbergasted when the Rabbi says that he cannot allow this as they don't want the jews immigrating to whereever they want. They are only allowed to leave to Israel.
That still doesn’t make any logical sense as to why the Bank of England (which I assume you mean) would need to approve anything and why Hitler wouldn’t do it anyway, just my opinion.
Jews needed an immigration visa into Palestine. Palestine was under League of Nations Mandate by the British. Hence, the need for a British issued immigration visum. And the Brits ended issuing immigration visa's to emigrating Jews in 1938, I belief.
And just as much there is AIPAC in America, there is a huge Jew-lobby in the UK. Hence the weight of the words of a London Rabbi.
But that doesn’t explain why Jews, facing a non-friendly (to say the least) government in Germany wouldn’t have happily migrated to a dozen other countries. Palestine/israel would have been far down the list. The idea that “a Rabbi” in London (especially considering that Judaism doesn’t have a central religious leader like the pope) seems to stretch credulity.
I am not so sure it was unfriendly. After the first window breaking called Crystal Nacht, which was a response to the Judean Boycott , emergency legislation was passed to stop it, otherwise the Haavara contract would not have been made.
There was even talk about using Madagascar as a Jewish Homeland as the previous deal with a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and TransJordan within the Arab League turned to nothing due to weak British action regarding the emergence of the Kingdom of Jordan.
So, I don't know. It may be considered hostile. On the other hand, having your own land and being boss there without Jew supremacy (Banking, News, Theater, Law, sciences, etc) is, based on the idea within that time frame of "every people have the right to choose their own destiny, not totally unreasonable.
And the Haavara deal was a deal that benefited both parties to the contract.
Of Kissinger it is said he fled Germany in 1938. The funny part is, emigration was positively viewed. And the details of the story show Kissinger went away with the blessing of the German Government. And they even worked with the Mossad precursor to achieve what was necessary.
The peace treaty of Versailles simply drew arbitrary lines on a map, in service of Empire building. And here we also find the root causes of dissension in many areas currently having to deal with political instability. It seems to me the IDEA, flowing from the sovereignty of every man and woman, that a people contain the highest form of sovereignty, and thus are perfectly set to choose their own destiny was not a bad idea.
Today this is replaced by a Rules based international order. The rules are made by the power structures behind this idea, running roughshod over the question of sovereignty of the people.