Jack Smith asks court to ban Trump from introducing evidence of Jan. 6 security failures
(justthenews.com)
- P A N I C -
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
OK so real quick because I gotta head out.....
Thanks for writing such detail & clearly taking so much time & effort on this. I really do appreciate it and want to know what you (and others!) think.
I think by and large, like 95%++ we are on the same page on the bulk of our views / opinions on most of this stuff.
I think what's causing this discussion is the fact that it's written / text and hence ZERO tonality, body language, etc.
I do not - absolutely not - think "we" (whether society in general or whoever) should just go out & start killing people that "we" suspect (or even know) are criminals.
I do fully believe in "innocent until proven guilty" (now more than ever with Trump & J6 just to name a few!) and the overall process, and I believe that anyone accused of ANY crime should absolutely be entitled to a complete, thorough, and FAIR hearing.
That said; We've definitely swung too far in a very wrong way, where our justice system no longer works, hardly at all.
I don't think we should go out & start shooting people we SUSPECT of crime, but I do think that the victims of any sort of crime should never be arrested nor hassled for defending themselves at the moment of the crime.
For example; if you walk in on someone abusing your child & you kill them; that's not murder & the only thing you should be given is a parade & cash reward.
The "justice" system today has been so grotesquely warped & distorted that the families of actual criminals can sue the victims for "civil rights / emotional distress" and other utter clown world bullshit.
That's the sort of stuff that drives me insane, as I think it does most people.
I'll try to follow up with more later, but that's what I've got to start...
Probably so. Maybe 90%?
I don't know that this is what is causing the discussion, but I certainly think that written / text communications leaves out many critical aspects of communication, such as those you have cited.
I'm sure we would get to a much quickly and closer understanding of each other if we were able to meet and talk in person.
Maybe some of your text has been deliberate hyperbole, to emphasize what emotions the topic stirs up? In any case, it's clear that there are real and serious problems (virtually critical problems) in all sorts of systems, and the legal field most definitely so.
Thanks for the response!!!!
Oh one final thing I wanted to add;
FWIW, I do believe in the fundamental goodness & decency of mankind. I believe that about 90% of humans on this planet are good, kind, decent "normal" people, irrespective of who they are; what they believe, race / religion; etc.
I believe that our American form of government, Constitution; all our founding documents are the pinnacle of human government & existence. It is certainly imperfect, but the best system of government that has yet been devised by man.
More than anything, I think we need a clean sweep / reset. (Literally a "Great Reset" just in a way the globalists would hate).
We need to completely burn down ~90%+ of the government as it exists, and rebuild in a manner that's consistent with the Constitution.
Again I agree with you. :-)
Thanks for the response!!!!
Yes, for sure... I try to analogize but sometimes it (obviously) fails. And yes, I'm also generalizing & being a little hyperbolic...obviously not helping my case, LOL.
Anyway, Thanks for the discussion my friend.