https://twitter.com/Biz_Shrink/status/1740790026802462918
Added: the apology is about her claim that Trump visited the Epstein pedo island once, in 1997.
But when I see this tweet she retweeted its possible she is a Zionist asset.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (149)
sorted by:
Trump pointed to her and retweeted her video. She has to be playing a part.
It's also important to consider that her alleged part has nothing to do with Trump other than his being POTUS and/or CiC at the time she took the role.
It's not for her to campaign for Trump or stick up for him.
I see too much emotion in our analysis of JHH. A person who is readily open to being corrected isn't our enemy. In fact if you analyze this, her being wrong and readily admitting it, did a lot to clear up Trump's relationship w/Epstein--which is still widely misunderstood by the general public.
Look at how professional journalists react to being wrong and compare it to JHH. There's a world of difference. If you watch an interview or two with her you'll see she readily admits to having fewer pieces of the puzzle than most anons.
I think she was just bringing attention to the Epstein flight logs. Normies will watch if they think Trump was involved. Could be a wake up!
If you graph this out there was only benefit to what Jan did here.
100% of people who believed Trump wasn't involved still believe so.
But some subset of people who previously thought Trump was involved now are aware of an official correction.
So after emotions are put aside, and the results are fully analyzed, we clearly advanced a trench in the information war.
I would have to agree.
Good point, maybe this is a move to drag eyeballs to the flight logs? Use the boomerang of DJT being highlighted?