https://twitter.com/Biz_Shrink/status/1740790026802462918
Added: the apology is about her claim that Trump visited the Epstein pedo island once, in 1997.
But when I see this tweet she retweeted its possible she is a Zionist asset.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (149)
sorted by:
Why are you so upset when being presented with simple factual pieces of information? If you want to know how these pieces fit into the puzzle in my mind, I am happy to explain, but how I fit the puzzles into my frame is completely independent of my action of presenting the pieces to others. I might make a separate post outlining my own frame as more pieces of the puzzle fall in place.
But the real question is, are you ignoring these pieces so that the picture in your mind is not disturbed? If you are doing this, no judgement here - but its better to be mindful of that fact.
It is quite possible that rather than me seeking a butterfly in the blot, you already have a butterfly in your mind that you seek not to disturb.
In all this, you have never enunciated any meaning from her statements than is on their face. There is no blot. There is no meaning. You haven't shown otherwise. And I doubt there is a puzzle. I go outside my door to see the world, with its trees and clouds and light and moisture, and there is a lot of meaning for the discerning and insightful viewer, and it is no blot. There is clutter and there is meaning, and you have chosen to confuse the two. Life is too short to unscramble blots. Better to recognize them for what they are and move on.
What do you mean by "meaning from her statement" ?
That's what I am trying to ask you. You contend that some sort of meaning can be extracted from Jan Halper's apology and correction---beyond the obvious apology and correction. I'm all ears. Please elucidate.
So whats the obvious conclusion you extract from the apology?
And what did she correct?