I like your desire to be generous, and yes, certainly in some cases it can be true.
However, the facts show that this is NOT the case with VR. Rather, the facts indicate he's an opportunistic asset, being positioned to take away from Trump and prevent his second presidency.
I like your desire to be generous, and yes, certainly in some cases it can be true.
However, the facts show that this is NOT the case with VR. Rather, the facts indicate he's an opportunistic asset, being positioned to take away from Trump and prevent his second presidency.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5kGttIv/we-read-trumps-ts-post-vivek-is-/
Great post except the first sentence. OP is a shill attempting damage control.
I suspect you have at least a 50% chance of being right.
But note: there are those who shill deliberately (disinfo agents) and those who shill through ignorance.
An attempt at damage control would come from the former. The later just isn't aware of the holes in their thinking.
Then again, 3 years ago I thought that Candace Owens was just a misguided confused person. Boy, did that come back to bite me!
OK. Upgraded to 75% likelihood of being right.