In my previous experience, I have conducted extensive analysis on the facial features of Biden through the use of forensic facial wrinkle mapping techniques. These methods have proven to be equally reliable as fingerprinting methods and operate on a similar principle. It is worth noting that facial wrinkle mapping cannot be replicated in an imperceptible way through the use of masks, surgery, or makeup. Thus, I challenge anyone who posits the notion that Biden is a clone, an impersonator, or anyone other than the original individual, to provide evidence that matches or surpasses the credibility of forensic facial wrinkle mapping. For instance, the application of forensic audio analysis could be considered.
- 40+ point facial analysis visualization
- gif of images used
- Ear specific gif
- Additional research findings suggest that Biden may have undergone cosmetic procedures. Multiple plastic surgeons have made observations regarding his appearance. Dr. Steven Davis stated that based on photos taken over the years, it appears that Biden had a facelift at least a year ago, as evidenced by scars along the ear cartilage. Similarly, Dr. Barry Cohen mentioned that Biden had hair transplants in the past, which required subsequent adjustments to his frontal hairline. Dr. Cohen also speculated that Biden likely receives regular Botox injections and possibly filler. He further noted that such procedures are now common and not subjected to much scrutiny. For reference, I have included an image illustrating excessive scarring from a facelift, as well as a facelift gallery that showcases different outcomes, including earlobe attachment.
- face lift scar
- Earlobe attachment due to facelift
- many are not aware that biden has a malformed right upper ear
- additionally his right ear is attached while the left one is not.
I can draw some random markers too. You are no "expert" in this field. Trump said so..
And they showed his head half gone on tv glitch
Are you familiar with the concept of "cognitive dissonance"? It often arises when encountering information that contradicts strongly held beliefs. It is important to be mindful of this phenomenon when evaluating information that challenges the narrative we hold in our minds. Here are some common signs to be aware of. Expressing skepticism by stating "anyone can put random lines" can be indicative of cognitive dissonance, as it gives one a reason to dismiss the presented data without proper examination. Rest assured, this is not a case of random lines, but rather a carefully curated presentation of evidence. If you momentarily set aside any dissonance and truly scrutinize the information, you may be surprised by what you discover. Another sign to watch for is appealing to authority. It is peculiar to claim that I am not an expert in the field without even knowing who I am, as this suggests an attempt to dismiss information without thorough consideration. Please recognize that we are all here striving for truth. I have dedicated significant effort to objectively assessing whether Biden was replaced. Throughout this process, I have maintained an open mind and relied solely on empirical data, refraining from conjecture or emotional appeals