In my previous experience, I have conducted extensive analysis on the facial features of Biden through the use of forensic facial wrinkle mapping techniques. These methods have proven to be equally reliable as fingerprinting methods and operate on a similar principle. It is worth noting that facial wrinkle mapping cannot be replicated in an imperceptible way through the use of masks, surgery, or makeup. Thus, I challenge anyone who posits the notion that Biden is a clone, an impersonator, or anyone other than the original individual, to provide evidence that matches or surpasses the credibility of forensic facial wrinkle mapping. For instance, the application of forensic audio analysis could be considered.
- 40+ point facial analysis visualization
- gif of images used
- Ear specific gif
- Additional research findings suggest that Biden may have undergone cosmetic procedures. Multiple plastic surgeons have made observations regarding his appearance. Dr. Steven Davis stated that based on photos taken over the years, it appears that Biden had a facelift at least a year ago, as evidenced by scars along the ear cartilage. Similarly, Dr. Barry Cohen mentioned that Biden had hair transplants in the past, which required subsequent adjustments to his frontal hairline. Dr. Cohen also speculated that Biden likely receives regular Botox injections and possibly filler. He further noted that such procedures are now common and not subjected to much scrutiny. For reference, I have included an image illustrating excessive scarring from a facelift, as well as a facelift gallery that showcases different outcomes, including earlobe attachment.
- face lift scar
- Earlobe attachment due to facelift
- many are not aware that biden has a malformed right upper ear
- additionally his right ear is attached while the left one is not.
Facelift procedures only impact the layers of the dermis, and they don't go into the underlying facial muscles. I don't have a collection of links on this, but the biggest "tell" for me is how the original Biden had a peculiar pull of his right eyebrow upwards. The current resident has none of this forehead/eyebrow animation.
One may explain this away by botox, but the effects of botox are temporary, and we would see changes over time between injections. Also, botox is not injected into the muscles I'm referring to.
This isn't a good video, but you can see brief instances of that unique eyebrow quirk here: https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/decade-old-biden-footage-compared-recent-clips-shows-unmistakable-difference/
This statement may not entirely reflect the situation. There are facelift procedures available that can target asymmetrical eyebrow positioning. In the case of Joe Biden, such a procedure could have been considered appropriate. I have shared a video with you showcasing this specific procedure. Kindly observe the woman's ear and face area, noticing the presence of scarring or what could become scarring, which bears resemblance to the scarring observed here on Joe Biden.
The video link you shared only demonstrates the impact of a facelift on dermal layers. You can pull an eyebrow "permanently," for example, by the type of hairline incision demonstrated. That's not what I'm talking about with respect to Biden. He had a unique facial muscle pull on his right eyebrow that arched it in a peculiar manner, which was tied usually to a unique mannerism of his when speaking. His right eyebrow would arch upwards sharply, then release.
Plastic surgeons do not touch the muscles of the face. For a time, there was an experimental facelift procedure (I think it was called "threading"?) where a surgical thread was wrapped around/underneath a facial muscle, but that technique was limited to the cheek area.
There are also differences in "old" Biden vs. "new" Biden in the quality of his voice as well. These differences in his vocal quality can't all be attributed to aging vocal cords, and weaker breath. The old Biden had a very dynamic voice which he used for emphasis when necessary, making key words much louder than others. The new Biden almost speaks in a monotone, without even a hint of the speaking characteristics he once had. The new Biden has become angry the past year or two when speaking, when you would expect to hear this dynamic I refer to...but his voice remains monotone, albeit louder. So, the capability remains to speak the way I am talking about, but the characteristic is gone.
I would require a better video to fully comprehend your explanation regarding his eyebrow pull. When you mention that his voice is different, have you considered utilizing a forensic audio analyzer to verify its authenticity? Numerous options are available on the market that can effectively differentiate between the primary source and other humans, modified recordings, voice actors, and even artificial intelligence
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
So your answer is no, you cannot provide any evidence. Got it.
https://files.catbox.moe/bamw9k.jpg
Totally different people.
I am not totally convinced he's been replaced, but I'm certainly a little suspicious. Would the military intelligence not have access to the most advanced mask technology on earth? There's a video on YouTube called "Meet a Former CIA Chief of Disguise" in which they show previous generation masks. She even says something like, if we are allowed to show you these, they must have progressed far beyond this by now.
The old Biden had blue eyes. Now they look brown or black.
What about his eye color switching between blue and brown? And there's the time when the mask on the back of his neck wrinkled. Sorry, I don't have sauce. Just a good memory about these things.
Eye color can darken over time, and his eyes look different in different lighting.
I can draw some random markers too. You are no "expert" in this field. Trump said so..
And they showed his head half gone on tv glitch
Are you familiar with the concept of "cognitive dissonance"? It often arises when encountering information that contradicts strongly held beliefs. It is important to be mindful of this phenomenon when evaluating information that challenges the narrative we hold in our minds. Here are some common signs to be aware of. Expressing skepticism by stating "anyone can put random lines" can be indicative of cognitive dissonance, as it gives one a reason to dismiss the presented data without proper examination. Rest assured, this is not a case of random lines, but rather a carefully curated presentation of evidence. If you momentarily set aside any dissonance and truly scrutinize the information, you may be surprised by what you discover. Another sign to watch for is appealing to authority. It is peculiar to claim that I am not an expert in the field without even knowing who I am, as this suggests an attempt to dismiss information without thorough consideration. Please recognize that we are all here striving for truth. I have dedicated significant effort to objectively assessing whether Biden was replaced. Throughout this process, I have maintained an open mind and relied solely on empirical data, refraining from conjecture or emotional appeals
They look different.
Maybe we can perceive the devil inside moar and more as time goes on... ngl look like a claymation demon from The Gate fer fucksakes
😂😂😂
This is is an exercise in futility.
/