We're obviously of two different minds about this. And that's fine - I don't expect everyone to agree with me. I can be rather harsh and callous to those that have made an oath to do no harm and then make it a daily practice to break that oath.

You claim to want justice and retribution, but it seems you don't want to extract it from the only ones that can it can feasibly be extracted from. Thanks to a piece of 1986 legislation we cannot seek legal redress from vaccine manufacturers. We can apply for compensation from a government program, but it does absolutely nothing to stop the problem because the compensation is paid by taxpayers.

Bringing a class action law suit against the manufacturers gives the optics of something being done about the problem, but the ones that actually pay the fine are taxpayers again.

And yes, we should go after the big 3 letter agencies, the insurance magnates, and the pharma cartels. But good luck finding a judge willing to hear any of it while those targeted are free to spin any argument through media outlets or even create new pandemics as needed.

As I see it, it's nigh impossible to use our current system to hold these monsters accountable to anything unless a precedent is set. And the only chink in the armor is at the doctor-patient level. Doctors have the ability to hold pharmaceutical companies accountable. They are extremely unlikely to do so without pressure however, because it will mean a huge loss of revenue and clout. But they do have the power to not prescribe harmful substances, and they can be made to be more aware of what is harmful if we hold them accountable for not doing it.

Unless we force accountability into these people at every level possible, we will never have justice for this and only ensure the tyranny continues. Simply targeting their leadership is the equivalent of cutting heads of the hydra. The problem must be dealt with at the root. Going from the top down only ensures it gets stopped in court.