I think there's no way this article is genuine. It reads like someone trying to shift public opinion by appealing to empathy. "Stop being mean; I was just following orders."
There's not one example of the "abuse" she claims to experience, only vague allegations of online toxicity. I'll bet dollars to donuts most her "abuse" is either people pointing out how she ignored warnings and a lack of safety data, or it's people pointing out heart attacks and turbo cancers. And more than that, I'll bet she instigates the situations by saying something retarded. She anguishes over reading "endless" detox protocols but doesn't speak of trying even one.
These aren't the words of someone who regrets their actions, or wants justice for the inhumanity they experienced. No, she wants people to forget - for society to be primed for her and those like her to do it all over again.
It's more ubiquitous than most people realize, and often when they do realize, the cognitive dissonance is so overbearing that they put themselves back to sleep. If this problem were only occurring at the street level (isolated, random) and not in the upper echelons it would be much easier to deal with. But the problem has long since breached leadership circles. Just look at Vatican II.
Fear is the real virus
As is the history of virology. Anyone rational that looks at the methodologies can see the shenanigans: isolation via toxic addition, no control setup where "uninfected" cells are cultured with the exact same conditions as the infected ones, and best of all, virologists refuse to defend their position with data instead relying on ad hominem attacks and shutting down the discourse.
Are you counting cancer as the only injury marker?
He still talks about it in a positive light, but I think he's stuck between a rock and a hard place. He knows the media will go into overdrive attack mode if he speaks one word against big pharma, so he smiles and says how great our system is while trusting that the average Americans are waking up to the rotten decay.
They cannot control him - only attack, and by doing this he has effectively shut down what could've been the largest vector of media attack. Yes, it stinks and looks bad in a certain light, but he's limiting their available ammunition.
I can't speak from experience, but I've heard that most long-term "refugees" typically have a lower standard for hygiene which in and of itself would be a reason to expect an increase in illness caused by bacteria.
If you listen to mainstream news, absolutely yes and it's going to kill grandma unless you obey.
They can't even prove causation. Indirect evidence provides correlation at best - and even that's sketchy.
I have noticed lately that various bigwigs and MS journos seem remarkably concerned that they'll be prosecuted for something heinous the moment Trump gets in office again.
It's definitely better than doing nothing about it. Might be a problem if they apply the racist "if you're white, you're wrong" thinking and start fining or detaining "white abusers of hate law," but that in turn would probably make the native populace even more disgruntled.
Don't forget the African doctors that used those tests to find covid in mangoes and other fruits. Were going to see a lot of struggle from virologists to remain relevant and push their fear tactics as more and more people wake up to their deceptions.
John Rappaport tried to tell us in 2004
I'd love to know why Rosenau couldn't initiate a controlled flu infection in laboratory conditions over three experiments in Boston Harbor, San Francisco, and Gallup Island (1918-1919). I've read the methodology, and it really seems that if person to person transmission was the primary vector of contagion it would have occurred at least once with the procedures used in the experiments regardless of whether the pathogen is bacterial or viral.
Lewis Carroll, aka Ludovicus Carolus
I believe his birth name was Charles Dodgeson. He also wrote a math textbook titled Euclid's Modern Rivals, and I believe he served as a deacon for a short time in his local church. Chances are the story about his relationship with young Alice Liddell was probably true.
Exactly what the world needs more of: another way for consumers to synch more personal devices and properties to tracking networks.
Why are we even paying taxes? At this point the threat of prison is insufficient incentive to continue funding the destruction of our country.
They've been baffled about autism and SIDS in much the same way.
🎯
Making them keep it up and admit they overstepped both scientific knowledge and human rights would've been the real win.
Currently having the "dietary fat does not equal body fat" argument with my grandparents and my sister-in-law. Some people have the most amazing difficulty accepting that doctors and politicians will lie to the public and misrepresent data in exchange for lots of money.
About the aluminum though, the very first vaccine on the childhood schedule (hep-B) is reported to contain over 10x the amount of aluminum that's given as the upper safety limit for oral ingestion by infants. Very telling that parents that so much as question the methods of public school teachers can be labeled domestic terrorists, but a normalized practice of iatrogenesis on infants is just good faith behavior and best fit medical practice.
Anybody here remember the story about Nellie Bly? In 1887 she had herself committed in a women's mental asylum so she could document the abuse regularly committed on women, many of which likely had no mental problems before being committed.
You are far more confident in this than you should be.
Maybe so, but I think you might be right alongside me in that.
Well, let's try to hit bedrock: "There is a universe."
Seems like a good bedrock. We have to be somewhere. This exchange alone could be said to be proof of that because we are certainly not arguing with ourselves.
laws of nature inside this "universe" have not been constant for the life of the universe
Time to slow your roll for a moment. I never said facts aren't variable in that a change of circumstance can bring a change of environment or disposition. If you look at the theorized conditions of the early universe you might find many differences between that and its current condition (even if you think that is theorized as well).
I'm not sure where your position that physical laws should not change to fit physical conditions comes from, but I'm curious to know more.
need to hypothesize and present a different possible explanation for our measurements and observations
Perhaps you could elucidate the particular observations and measurements you're referring to.
Since the focus has relaxed to observable states of the universe, we can also speak of accuracy. An accurate statement of fact describes the change in reality in accordance to circumstance. One might argue that a fact that describes any amount of change is more accurate because change is one of the few observable constants. This is more commonly known as cause and effect.
That's a strange point of view that I'm going to disagree with based on the observable nature of reality.
If you put one bottle on a table, could you expect it to become two bottles without intervention? Of course not. You wouldn't even have to think about it because you are in possession of the facts about bottles and their capabilities to spontaneously generate.
A statement that always describes reality is a statement of fact.
Crux of the biscuit right there. Facts must be able to withstand open debate and all attempts to disprove them. Science (and hence the public) are better served by researchers attempting to disprove themselves and others more than any amount of research done solely to prove a desired outcome.
Death, paralysis, seizures, autism, allergies, etc. And all that was before the mRNA.