Well, actually, I think its the opposite.

Their headlines are completely bogus and crap, but to bolster them up (and give them an air of validity or veracity to the undiscerning) they follow them with information that in and of itself is neutral or factual, often by simply copy pasting the content.

I've done numerous reviews and examinations of their articles (most of which you can find by searching for "clickbait" in the search field here at GAW), and the following stock standard formula is apparent:

One, Crap, sensationalist fabricated headline

Two, follow headline with two or three sentences asserting fabricated information

Three, copy/past or write body of text referencing some tangentially related content usually opinion, but with some actual factual information or basis

Example:

One: Nikki Haley: ‘Only Bill Gates Can Save Humanity’

Fabrication/deception: Presented here in single quote marks giving the impression that Haley said or wrote this, which is a complete fabrication.

Two: Neocon presidential candidate Nikki Haley once referred to billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates as a hero who will save humanity via the mRNA vaccinations.

Fabrication/deception: Haley never referred to Gates as "a hero" or as someone "who will save humanity" let alone someone who will "save humanity via the mRNA vaccinations"

Note the deceptive hypnotic effects of layering in presuppositions (if you have studied hypnosis, these are easy to recognize): layering in significant trigger points for people awakened to the Matrix: Gates, eugenicist (factual), hero, save humanity, mRNA vaxxes.

According to Haley, Gates deserves high praise for his efforts to jab every single person on earth with his toxic COVID vaccinations:

Fabrication/deception: While Haley did praise and say that Gates deserves praise, it was not for "his efforts to jab every single person on earth" with "his toxic Covid vaccinations". By layering in opinion as if fact, this sentence presents the information / lie that Haley directly praised Gates for using toxic vaccinations, and for attempting to jab every single person on earth.

Which is NOT what she did. This particular information structure and text is highly deceptive and manipulative. It presents Haley as an openly evil super villain, unabashedly and openly touting evil. The truth is, she is a neocon covertly promoting evil, clearly playing a deep state role, supporting the facade that Gates is doing something good.

This sort of fusing of Awakened people's subjective ideas & thoughts (gates is evil, gates wants to jab every person, the vaccines are toxic) - regardless of whether they are accurate or not (these one's are) - in a fabricated way with the target individual's behavior: "She praised him for this" is 100% designed to trigger and activate the fight/flight response and subvert/side step any discernment muscles that are not flexed or which are not directly active.

A simple but easily conceivable example of this method is as follows:

A to C: I think your choice was unwise!

B to C: Did you hear what he just said? He said you are an idiot! He's making a fool of you man!!! Are you going to take that???!!

B's goal is NOT to enlighten, educate or help C, but to foster and activate B's fight/flight reactionary response (in order to trigger conflict and an aggressive response to A.

In this case, the objective of TPV is not to stir conflict with Haley. The purpose is to undermine the capacity of anons and awakened people to apply discernment and critical thinking. It is to get people to swallow the headline, ingest the fabrication as if fact, and react (thereby actively dampening the will and intent to apply discernment, ideally to further retard any existing development of independent critical thinking).

Evidence: the reactions of the board to posts like this, which are usually about 90%+ reaction to fabricated information (aka disinformation/misinformation).

If the real message was, "Haley is a deep state player", well, duh, is there ANYONE on the board who doesn't think or know that?

But that's not the impact of the post. The impact of the post is that dozens of frogs get triggered to the point of becoming abusive, reactive towards a fabricated image of Haley, and come away from the post with a nugget of disinformation firmly lodged within their mental framework. Layer in enough of those nuggets, and the more easily frogs, or anyone, is manipulated.

Three: Thelibertydaily.com reports: Some will say, “It’s just an old Tweet.” To those people I would agree that by itself it would not be a big deal, but......

The rest of the 'article' is simply copy/paste of an opinion piece by Rucker at TheLibertyDaily, an article that is notably not particularly complimentary of Trump, it shoudl be noted, and which promotes the normie perspective that Trump is culpable because of his connections with the vaxxes via operation warp speed, etc.

But that's the formular TPV uses. The headline is crap, actual feces. The following two or three sentences reiterate that crap, and develop the manipulatory twisting of information and fusing of fact with fiction in order to further trigger the targeted response. This is then given some basis or semblance of foundation by quoting or copy/pasting actual factual information. It is the chaser. The more easily ingested factual content that removes the taste of the poison pill once swallowed.

If you review any TPV article with this formula in mind, you'll see that they are consistent.

So hopefully you can see why I think you have it the wrong way around. The headlines and following theme sentences are the poison pill, the toxic content. The body of the text is where some actual factual information can be found and used IF one successfully navigates and sidesteps the deceptive poison. (however, as a post on GAW, usually 90%+ don't navigate or side step the poison, because they just accept it as real, and react, instead of questioning).

The TPV method can be analogized as taking a poison and coating it first in sugar and then coating it in a nutritious or semi-nutritious (possibly including semi-toxic additives) substance.

This is why the postings from TPV should never be tolerated at GAW, UNLESS it is to dissect the methodology and to expose it for what it is. Btw, the methodology used by TPV is inherently satanic and is how satanic forces actually attack human beings, as many on the board who pray and battle with spiritual evil will testify.

If I were modding the board (and thank you mods, you are awesome), I would take that post, write a note to the OP suggesting, like BB did in this case, for the OP to sidestep the TPV article and find any factual or useful information, and post that instead. Then I would suspend the post or remove it, or get the Op to remove it. But that's just me...

So what relevance, if any, might TPV content have here at GAW?

Reviewing the factual or semi-factual content FIRST, off board, and then using that to track down information that may be useful and relevant - in this case that Haley made a tweet in 2020 praising bill Gates - and THEN posting THAT Factual information to the board would be a completely valid approach for frogs.

Actually that approach would inherently undermine and build resilience and resistance to manipulative operations like TPV, and the board need never be exposed directly to the TPV content (their steps one and two).

Alternatively, allowing TPV content on the board exclusively when it is used as a case study or analysis of clickbait or disinfo operations, presented to the board clearly as an example of disinfo for froggy study into the enemy's techniques and weapons.

I hope you'll read carefully and consider what I've written here, Fat. A mere 'warning' on TPV posts is not enough. The articles themselves are poison pills intended to harm us and the movement towards truth.

If you are going to put a bomb in the middle of your house, because you think that somehow awareness of bomb mechanics might be useful to your kids, disarm the bomb FIRST. Don't just put a live bomb there with a warning.

Better yet, put a book explaining bomb mechanics there, and only add a disarmed bomb once the kids have digested the content and are mature enough to handle the device in real life.

u/bubble_bursts

u/catsfive

u/undine53