Daily Mail in the UK have called him a "QAnon Conspiracy Theorist".
They can do that all they want; it's so 2020. Nobody cares.
Nobody in their right mind ever talks about Q or "QAnon" any more. It's a DEAD ISSUE, only in the sense that whoever it is completely vanished into thin air and stopped posting— over three years ago. It's over. Q has nothing to say for themselves, so IMHO anons don't need to be saying anything FOR them per se. Just letting the operation proceed according to plan and helping normies understand what they're witnessing are enough.
There is literally no need to ever mention "Q" to normies. I just share the intel and ideas that Q shared with us. If they ask for a source, why say Q is the source? What are you going to say—"Well, it's from some anonymous guy, or guys, who posted 5000 messages of a cryptic nature on some obscure websites and then disappeared years ago, right after Trump left office!" Not gonna sound credible to someone who hasn't bathed and stewed in this stuff for half a decade, and who has seen more than 1,000 media hitpieces bashing the crap out of Q.
If the newb asks about "QAnon" you can truthfully say you know nothing about that (because fake MSM/ C_A term used solely to discredit anons).
Daily Mail in the UK have called him a "QAnon Conspiracy Theorist".
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13027261/son-decapitated-father-youtube-video-qanon-conspiracy-theorist.html
They can do that all they want; it's so 2020. Nobody cares.
Nobody in their right mind ever talks about Q or "QAnon" any more. It's a DEAD ISSUE, only in the sense that whoever it is completely vanished into thin air and stopped posting— over three years ago. It's over. Q has nothing to say for themselves, so IMHO anons don't need to be saying anything FOR them per se. Just letting the operation proceed according to plan and helping normies understand what they're witnessing are enough.
There is literally no need to ever mention "Q" to normies. I just share the intel and ideas that Q shared with us. If they ask for a source, why say Q is the source? What are you going to say—"Well, it's from some anonymous guy, or guys, who posted 5000 messages of a cryptic nature on some obscure websites and then disappeared years ago, right after Trump left office!" Not gonna sound credible to someone who hasn't bathed and stewed in this stuff for half a decade, and who has seen more than 1,000 media hitpieces bashing the crap out of Q.
If the newb asks about "QAnon" you can truthfully say you know nothing about that (because fake MSM/ C_A term used solely to discredit anons).
of course they are.