I’m just not sure where the free speech violation is. Tv networks are not public forums, as we both know, so they are under no obligation to broadcast anything they don’t want to
I think the original comment was highlighting the irony of being a land of "free speech," yet the government being in a position to cancel such speech, not at the broadcaster's desire.
I understand that but that’s not what’s happening here. The government is clearly letting him speak on one of the world’s largest social media platforms.
…you didn’t know that tv networks weren’t open forums until now?
That was obvious from childhood. Where do you get this question?
I’m just not sure where the free speech violation is. Tv networks are not public forums, as we both know, so they are under no obligation to broadcast anything they don’t want to
I think the original comment was highlighting the irony of being a land of "free speech," yet the government being in a position to cancel such speech, not at the broadcaster's desire.
I understand that but that’s not what’s happening here. The government is clearly letting him speak on one of the world’s largest social media platforms.