The Truth About Tucker. It’s worse than you can imagine.
(open.substack.com)
🤡 SOWING DIVISION ARTICLE 🤬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (120)
sorted by:
There is no doubt that Tucker's family is deeply tied to the control of information (C_A) and the banksters. There is no doubt that Tucker "tried" to get into the C_A. There is no doubt that immediately after they "rejected him" his father packs up the truck and they all moved to DC, where immediately after that Tucker had a meteoric rise in being a Voice in "news."
All of those things are easy to show. Do I think Tucker was a part of the information control system? Absolutely. I have yet to find a single person who makes it even slightly big in news media who does not have a similar story. That doesn't mean that he isn't also (as of right now) working for We The People.
The only way that it is possible to take down an operation like the Cabal, that controls every single facet of our lives and beliefs, is from the inside.
The Q operation is full of insiders. Period. Any honest investigation into the people that we think are likely part of the Q team (Trump e.g.) suggests that they are (or were) Cabal insiders.
It is my sincerest hope they are working for We The People, and not as Controlled Opposition. I think it is the former, because it seems we are headed towards a true reveal of the fuckery, and towards an understanding of how we must guide our own future, and not be "subjects" to "good leaders."
I remain skeptical and on the lookout for fuckery, but I also remain hopeful. What I do not do is try to delusion myself into thinking that the people in charge are some sort of saints. You can't have saints running such an operation, unless by "saints" you mean undercover, turned, or otherwise controlled operatives, all of whom have had to get their hands dirty at some point.
The only way you can discern things in the middle of a 5G info war, is to assess outcomes. Its also important to not lock yourself into certain assumptions and be willing to change them as the facts change.
As of this moment, Tucker is killing it in revealing the fuckery of the DS.
Given the implosion of the left with Tucker's Putin interview, I find the timing of this substack very sus. If I was the DS and was worried about the popularity of Tucker and the rocks he's turning over, this sort of hit piece is exactly how'd I sow the seeds of doubt to contain him.
Keep in mind, they haven't shown were Tucker has recently got anything wrong or even misled you. Its just fear porn based on dots you can connect back mainly only through his father. Then there is falsities such as he implying he focuses on the culture war such as racist trees (wut?). One, politics is down stream of culture and culture HAS been weaponized. However, he rarely focuses on it. He's been going after all the big things since he was set free from FOX.
Again, I don't find Tucker focuses hardly at all on these things, but read this quote from the article and tell me it doesn't wreak of a lefty author who can't help themselves from defending liberals. Not only do they accuse Tucker of attacking these things, its in a tone of "attacking liberals is not good", and it attempts to absolve lefties of things they have actually done by saying "supposedly". As if there should be doubt.
Outcomes and motives.
$.02
I suggest this is the best way to ascertain the reality of all of history as well. When you dig into history (especially the past three centuries, though not limited to that period), everything seems to have a single source in both funding and propaganda (control of information). When you understand how widespread this "single source"ness is, and how far back it goes, you stop assuming that the outcome was unintentional. Thus, the outcome (who really benefitted) is, I suggest, the evidence of intent. It is certainly a much better indicator than the official narrative (who writes the history books?).
I agree this looks like a DS hitpiece, and it probably is. But it is also important to realize that if you don't understand the larger operation of Q, and you look at all the Controlled Opposition operations of the past, it is extremely difficult to come to any other conclusion than that someone like Tucker is also Controlled Opposition.
That is the problem with coming to any "conclusions." There exists esoteric knowledge, obfuscated pieces of evidence all over the place, that can only be found by digging deep, that can drastically change the perspective of how to incorporate other evidence into any theory of "what is really going on." We have the advantage of Q. Now, if Q are themselves CO, then our perspective is also skewed by missing evidence to support that.
Do the best you can with the information you have, but keep your mind open to new evidence, no matter where it leads.
As you suggest.
You know the boards used to be full of people that understood all this. It's strange how we have to keep repeating it, but I guess its another small part of the "great awakening." Nice comment! People just need to sit down and read Chapter 13 of the Art of War. It only takes about five minutes, but lays out how complex things behind the scenes really are. I also really appreciate your healthy skepticism of Q. Wise!
Yes. There's been a lot of turnover.