The Truth About Tucker. It’s worse than you can imagine.
(open.substack.com)
🤡 SOWING DIVISION ARTICLE 🤬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (120)
sorted by:
There is no doubt that Tucker's family is deeply tied to the control of information (C_A) and the banksters. There is no doubt that Tucker "tried" to get into the C_A. There is no doubt that immediately after they "rejected him" his father packs up the truck and they all moved to DC, where immediately after that Tucker had a meteoric rise in being a Voice in "news."
All of those things are easy to show. Do I think Tucker was a part of the information control system? Absolutely. I have yet to find a single person who makes it even slightly big in news media who does not have a similar story. That doesn't mean that he isn't also (as of right now) working for We The People.
The only way that it is possible to take down an operation like the Cabal, that controls every single facet of our lives and beliefs, is from the inside.
The Q operation is full of insiders. Period. Any honest investigation into the people that we think are likely part of the Q team (Trump e.g.) suggests that they are (or were) Cabal insiders.
It is my sincerest hope they are working for We The People, and not as Controlled Opposition. I think it is the former, because it seems we are headed towards a true reveal of the fuckery, and towards an understanding of how we must guide our own future, and not be "subjects" to "good leaders."
I remain skeptical and on the lookout for fuckery, but I also remain hopeful. What I do not do is try to delusion myself into thinking that the people in charge are some sort of saints. You can't have saints running such an operation, unless by "saints" you mean undercover, turned, or otherwise controlled operatives, all of whom have had to get their hands dirty at some point.
I'm starting to think of this concept as The Saint Jesus Fallacy. When redpilling, I often get the response of "Well Trump (or any patriots leader) isn't perfect so... " as if we should embrace enslavement and death at the hands of PED0FILES because our best option isn't perfect. I call that out. Who among us is perfect and why are you insistent on letting yourself be fooled by your enemy that only perfect can beat them? What the sleeper is saying is that their enemy is bad but practically perfect so you can't "Trump" that. It's twisted logic.
The only way you can discern things in the middle of a 5G info war, is to assess outcomes. Its also important to not lock yourself into certain assumptions and be willing to change them as the facts change.
As of this moment, Tucker is killing it in revealing the fuckery of the DS.
Given the implosion of the left with Tucker's Putin interview, I find the timing of this substack very sus. If I was the DS and was worried about the popularity of Tucker and the rocks he's turning over, this sort of hit piece is exactly how'd I sow the seeds of doubt to contain him.
Keep in mind, they haven't shown were Tucker has recently got anything wrong or even misled you. Its just fear porn based on dots you can connect back mainly only through his father. Then there is falsities such as he implying he focuses on the culture war such as racist trees (wut?). One, politics is down stream of culture and culture HAS been weaponized. However, he rarely focuses on it. He's been going after all the big things since he was set free from FOX.
Again, I don't find Tucker focuses hardly at all on these things, but read this quote from the article and tell me it doesn't wreak of a lefty author who can't help themselves from defending liberals. Not only do they accuse Tucker of attacking these things, its in a tone of "attacking liberals is not good", and it attempts to absolve lefties of things they have actually done by saying "supposedly". As if there should be doubt.
Outcomes and motives.
$.02
I suggest this is the best way to ascertain the reality of all of history as well. When you dig into history (especially the past three centuries, though not limited to that period), everything seems to have a single source in both funding and propaganda (control of information). When you understand how widespread this "single source"ness is, and how far back it goes, you stop assuming that the outcome was unintentional. Thus, the outcome (who really benefitted) is, I suggest, the evidence of intent. It is certainly a much better indicator than the official narrative (who writes the history books?).
I agree this looks like a DS hitpiece, and it probably is. But it is also important to realize that if you don't understand the larger operation of Q, and you look at all the Controlled Opposition operations of the past, it is extremely difficult to come to any other conclusion than that someone like Tucker is also Controlled Opposition.
That is the problem with coming to any "conclusions." There exists esoteric knowledge, obfuscated pieces of evidence all over the place, that can only be found by digging deep, that can drastically change the perspective of how to incorporate other evidence into any theory of "what is really going on." We have the advantage of Q. Now, if Q are themselves CO, then our perspective is also skewed by missing evidence to support that.
Do the best you can with the information you have, but keep your mind open to new evidence, no matter where it leads.
As you suggest.
You know the boards used to be full of people that understood all this. It's strange how we have to keep repeating it, but I guess its another small part of the "great awakening." Nice comment! People just need to sit down and read Chapter 13 of the Art of War. It only takes about five minutes, but lays out how complex things behind the scenes really are. I also really appreciate your healthy skepticism of Q. Wise!
Yes. There's been a lot of turnover.
"The only way you can discern things in the middle of a 5G info war, is to assess outcomes. Its also important to not lock yourself into certain assumptions and be willing to change them as the facts change."
This, along with a lot of replies to this - adding clarification and extended views - are full of a lot of wisdom that - MANY who say they are awake miss.
This one statement alone is worth a shirt.
And - I'll add something to this.
The Bible says that "we will know them by their fruits."
Matthew 7
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
"assess outcomes"
God's word has wisdom that never stops speaking to us.
Additionally - "discern things in the middle of a 5G info war"
What's the difference between an information war and a spiritual war?
I submit, they are the same.
Everything on earth is under a spiritual reality. The eternal battle between LIES and TRUTH.
When the web is so thick and tangled - how do you sort your way through, without getting stuck in it's mess yourself?
Hebrews 4
12 For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.
God's word has wisdom that never stops speaking to us - especially in the midst of battle!
I’ll updoot that!
Of course, Tucker was actually slow on this and it has been talked about and happening for years before he finally started talking about it.
But this is obviously a leftist hit piece to contain a line like that.
Absolutely.
Very Well said. Tucker, much like Elon, is absolutely working for We, the People/white hats. The question becomes this: are they a double agent (Ala DJT) or were they "recruited" by the WHs for this operation? And in order to turn the tide of public conscientious/awakening, you need people who speak the truth.
I think both Tucker and Elon were working on the opposite side, but were "recruited" to help turn the tide - simply due to their history and actions in the past. Remember the Cabal controls both the narrative and counter-narrative (or used to, anyway).
Contrasting this with DJT, who infiltrated the black hat operations (see his early ties with Epstein, for example), so he could lead and be part of the WH apparatus to take down the Cabal. I think there are few known WH operatives, that we can definitively pin on as "always part of the good guys" - I think many of the talking heads we know were BH -> WH. They were a part of the Matrix (like the character Cipher in the movie) to keep the sheep on the plantation.
u/#q461
THIS☝️is my conclusion also...
Seems like asserting that all members of Q team and white hats have dirty hands, meaning evil crimes in their history, or else they categorically are not involved in the Q operation. If I have that about right, then IMHO that is an unfounded and irrational assumption.
No credible people have advanced the notion that, e.g., President Trump, General Flynn, Admiral Rogers, or others plausibly involved among the ~10 people who know the full picture, as Q put it, are cabal insiders, as in deeply evil, part of the cult, the cabal, the child-trafficking pedophiles, the deepstate, etc.
Did you maybe just mean cabal-adjacent (as in Trump seen in same room with other celebrities and also scum Epstein, at NY billionaire parties)
It is a generalization based on investigating those who it seems may be part of the Q team. This includes Trump.
Let's do a short list. To make a full case for everyone would take too long.
Admiral Rogers:
Michael Flynn:
I'm not doing Trump even though it is an easy to show and long list. Every time I show it people's need for it to be seen other than "what an honest look at the evidence suggests" gets so tangled up in the discussion that it immediately devolves into a "my beliefs must be the truth" scream. Let's just say, if you look for evidence of deep and compromising connections between the Cabal and Trump, it is not hard to find. However you want to categorize that evidence is on you.
As for the two above, the President (in this case Obama and Baby Bush) personally selected both of them for their top level positions in their intelligence committee. Flynn "knows where the bodies are buried" because he was Obama's top intelligence guy.
The President can select anyone they want for those positions. Those positions are positions of incredible power and privy information of the doings of the Cabal. Why would a corrupt President (Agent of the Cabal) select anyone who did not have all the required credentials to signify them as a Cabal agent?
Now you can say that is "speculation" and to that I somewhat agree, but a deeper dive into how the system actually works suggests that EVERYONE at the very top level (like these people) is not only born into Cabal families, but is selected for their meteoric path because they fit the required profile of a Cabal agent. My investigation strongly suggests that no one makes it that high without being a member of the Cabal.
Period.
Why would anyone not Cabal make it that high?
The Cabal runs the show. Every President has ties to the Cabal going back to Washington. Are there factions within the Cabal? Maybe. Are a couple Presidents working for different factions (Jackson, JFK, Reagan before his assassination e.g.)? Maybe. But they don't get there except by allowance of the Cabal, which means they have passed certain tests (done bad things). The same can be said for all of the people that immediately surround the Presidents, which most certainly includes the directors of intelligence.
This operation may have taken decades to get to the Q phase of the plan ???? We just dont know ! I have prayed that GOD let's me live long enough to learn the truth.
I too hope I make it to the credits.
I also hope I make it to the world beyond, and that The Show has a happy (enough) ending. But if I make it to the credits, and The Show doesn't suck, I will be satisfied.
It still bothers me that Tucker frequented Comet Pizza...
I know I’ve explained this before. I was the first person to tell Tucker about Pizzagate, as far as I know. He said he hadn’t heard about it, but said he had taken his kids there several times as it was walking distance from his house. I wouldn’t read too much into it. Tucker isn’t a pedo
Agree, it was a local hotspot.
Not saying he is a pedo at all here but, It is tough not to be a little suspicious about ‘any knowledge’ given the large amount perverted artwork on the walls and bands that played there etc.
Also, the word typically gets out on the goings-on at places like that through local gossip. Hell, they were instagramming it all - not really hiding things.
Maybe he was aloof though, certainly possible - could have been a ‘front roomer’ only I guess,
I’ve been in there and you’re right. In the front it’s pretty innocuous. The back gets weird. I did a walk through and some surveillance on the place in the earliest of v/PG days. The stairs to the basement are in the rear entrance vestibule on the Little Red Fox size. Every building on that block has a basement.
Thanks blacksmith for your valuable input!
Is there any evidence of that beyond a single comment on the chans?
I've seen and saved pictures of Tucker in Posts at Comet Pizza but that was 4 phones back...
Thank goodness it’s impossible for anyone to just accidentally walk into Comet pizza!
I mean, how would we know who the bad guys are if literally anyone could walk in off the street during published business hours, amirite?
I remember hearing that he liked that place. So, I found this article. History of Comet and Tucker is mentioned as a VIP regular.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/05/AR2007070501270.html
...very interesting, ' 4 phones back ' how far back do u go ?
Did he go there for the pizza or for the "pizza"? Until that's established with a credible source where I can look at the proof myself (not "some guy said"), I'm regarding this as a really lazy attempt at character assassination.