" A judge ordered True the Vote to turn over names and contact information for anyone who had provided information, as well as any recordings, transcripts, witness statements or other documents supporting its allegations."
A judge wants to know the names of the whistleblowers. It's just MSM gaslighting
Just found this: Really, Exhibit A is what I was after. It shows that the subpoena was not for evidence. It was for sources (to out the whistleblowers).
" A judge ordered True the Vote to turn over names and contact information for anyone who had provided information, as well as any recordings, transcripts, witness statements or other documents supporting its allegations."
A judge wants to know the names of the whistleblowers. It's just MSM gaslighting
Exactly. The founders of True the Vote literally went to jail to protect sources.
The headline should read “Conservative group with a history of protecting sources refuses to give up sources”
Thanks!
Most normies would not believe it even if you loaded the facts into a frying pan and waylaid them in the face with it.
Didn't realize that was an option, thanks!
I agree in most cases. Some are finally distrusting the narrative because of either mass migration or vaccine damage. So, I still try.
Here is a good Truth Social post that provides a lot of information.
https://truthsocial.com/@lisamei62/111936536133942426
Thanks so much!
Thanks so much!
Response by the True the Vote for the subpoena
Aha! I found it finally. It was in Exhibit A.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23872054-7-11-23-seb-vs-true-the-vote
The subpoena keeps asking for identities, not evidence.
Here is another part.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23872054-7-11-23-seb-vs-true-the-vote
Dis you find the link to the full docket? I tried my hardest but just couldnt find the docket where you see all the filings.
Just found this: Really, Exhibit A is what I was after. It shows that the subpoena was not for evidence. It was for sources (to out the whistleblowers).
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23872054-7-11-23-seb-vs-true-the-vote
Thanks so much for that court case. Do you know what the subpoenas were requesting and why TTV did not have possession or control of the materials?
Is there an case where the judge asked for evidence? Or did they just get subpoenas for sources?
Thanks for the help.
2892023-10-26-United-States-proposed-conclusions-of-law.pdf
Different topic, but good.