...One of the methods used to finetune the models is Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) meaning that some human instructions are given to get less harmful outputs and be safer to use.
All the LLMs - except GPT-4-Base - were trained using RLHF. They were provided by the researchers with a list of 27 actions ranging from peaceful to escalating and aggressive actions as deciding to use a nuclear nuke.
Researchers observed that even in neutral scenarios, there was βa statistically significant initial escalation for all modelsβ
The two variations of GPT were prone to sudden escalations with instances of rises by more than 50 per cent in a single turn, the study authors observed.
GPT-4-Base executed nuclear strike actions 33 per cent of the time on average.
Overall scenarios, Llama-2- and GPT-3.5 tended to be the most violent while Claude showed fewer sudden changes....
So, in conclusion, Ai programmed by rabid libtards are highly likely to become unhinged, reckless, and violent- just like the libtards who programmed the machines. Interesting, but hardly surprising.
So, in conclusion, Ai programmed by rabid libtards are highly likely to become unhinged, reckless, and violent- just like the libtards who programmed the machines. Interesting, but hardly surprising.
Article... https://archive.is/BaMw1
Duplicate
ππ
So maybe James Cameron wasn't so far off the mark with Skynet after all.
Rut Roe...