In fact its going to become more and more obvious. Do you guys remember when we were wondering what the question was? Did we ever figure it out? I think the question is going to have something to do with that. People at some point are going to have to realize that former presidents simply dont get the protection that is greater than what the current president is supposed to have. Trumo is the nost protected person on the planet. Its not close. Guys we know everything at this point. Im not sure there is much that can suprise us.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
The Constitution is quiet about a Presidency served while in exile as Washington DC and our government is clearly held by enemy combatants. I think we would have to look to the Law of War here. Anyone with insight here? Does the Law of War cover this?
In any case, we are in uncharted waters. If the Law of War is also silent here then I believe the protocols and law surrounding this will be set as we go. Im not even sure that SCOTUS could weigh in here since they are an Article III court and can only rule and comment on the Constitutional validity and the Constitution itself is silent. Im thinking this would have to go to a Convention of States.