You stated the kill switch to be a true thing, and that is a declaration. The ordinary meaning of a statement. Such things can also be remarks. You apparently cannot tolerate overlapping categories.
I will stick with your own admission it was a fantasy. You came right out and conceded that it was. I have a good memory for that kind of faux pas.
Burden of proof comes from logic, and was applied to trial proceedings. You are maybe aware that lawyers were originally trained in logic? (Maybe not.)
You are the one saying these are mRNA shots. But if there is anything on the same physical scale, the criticism still applies. You have just abandoned the ever-popular "it's 6G" crowd. I'll sit back and watch. Now you have no plausible mechanism for a switch. The net result, which I will continue to come back to, is that you have absolutely no basis of proof for your fantasy. What else can you call it? It is not a reasoned and supported hypothesis.
In your case, I can win lots of bets with the presumption that you will wiggle your way to deflect and avoid coming up with any substance to your claim. Kill switches are fantasy. Prove me wrong. (Prediction: you won't because you haven't because you can't.)
Look you said there was a kill switch. That makes sense only if you are imputing truth to what you say Or, as you admitted, it was just fantasy. Here you are now denying it was a true thing...which equals it being a fantasy. Why do you keep doing this?
You stated the kill switch to be a true thing, and that is a declaration. The ordinary meaning of a statement. Such things can also be remarks. You apparently cannot tolerate overlapping categories.
I will stick with your own admission it was a fantasy. You came right out and conceded that it was. I have a good memory for that kind of faux pas.
Burden of proof comes from logic, and was applied to trial proceedings. You are maybe aware that lawyers were originally trained in logic? (Maybe not.)
You are the one saying these are mRNA shots. But if there is anything on the same physical scale, the criticism still applies. You have just abandoned the ever-popular "it's 6G" crowd. I'll sit back and watch. Now you have no plausible mechanism for a switch. The net result, which I will continue to come back to, is that you have absolutely no basis of proof for your fantasy. What else can you call it? It is not a reasoned and supported hypothesis.
In your case, I can win lots of bets with the presumption that you will wiggle your way to deflect and avoid coming up with any substance to your claim. Kill switches are fantasy. Prove me wrong. (Prediction: you won't because you haven't because you can't.)
Liar. I challenge you to show me where I stated it as a true thing.
Look you said there was a kill switch. That makes sense only if you are imputing truth to what you say Or, as you admitted, it was just fantasy. Here you are now denying it was a true thing...which equals it being a fantasy. Why do you keep doing this?
Liar again. Why cant you back up this blatant claim with a link to where I supposedly said this? Should be easy. I wrote everything in simple English.