I have been reading the Geneva Bible--the Bible that the pilgrims brought with them to America. It predates the King James Bible by roughly 50 years and the KJV translators made ample use of the Geneva Bible. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but in Chapter 9 is the discussion of the blowing of the 5th trumpet. (I'm standardizing the spelling here because the Geneva Bible has no J's, the u's are v's, the s's sometimes look like f's, etc.)
-
And there came out of the smoke Locusts upon the earth; and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. [Like the sting of a needle maybe?]
-
And it was commanded them, that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree: but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads. [a footnote for this verse regarding the men in question says: "That is, the infidels whom Satan blindeth with the efficacy of error." (Interesting word choice there: "efficacy" of error, since "efficacy" is a word generally used now in relation to medicine. And we certainly saw a lot of people blinded by MSM and the whole COVID puppeteers who certainly seem to be working for Satan)]
-
And to them was commanded that they should not kill them, but that they should be vexed five months, and that their pain should be as the pain that cometh of a scorpion, when he hath stung a man. [one of the footnotes for this verse: "The elect for a certain space and at times are in troubles: for the grasshoppers endure but from April to September, which is five months." Another footnote regarding the sting: "For at the beginning, the sting of their conscience once seemeth as nothing, but except they soon seek remedy, they perish." This reminds me of all the discussion of venom and other poisons being in the vaccines.]
-
Therefore in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it, and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.
-
And the form of the locusts was like unto horses prepared unto battle, and on their heads were, as it were, crowns, like unto gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. [Crown like "corona"? Faces like men like manmade maybe?]
-
And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions. [Hair like the blood clots maybe?]
-
And they had habbergions [a type of chainmail armor apparently], like to the habbergions of iron: and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots when many horses run into battle.
-
And they had tails like unto scorpions and there were stings in their tails & their power was to hurt men five months. [Footnote on stings in this one: "To infect & kill with their venomous doctrine." The Geneva Bible translators were seeing this all as allegory, but what if it was maybe also more literal than they imagined?]
-
And they have a King over them, which is the Angel of the bottomless pit, whose name is Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is named Apollyon. [Footnote for this verse for the word "Angel": "That is, destroyer, which is Antichrist, the Pope, king of hypocrites & Satan's ambassador." The pilgrims where very early protestants, so they weren't fans of the Catholic Pope.]
-
One woe is past, and behold, yet two woes come after this.
-
The the sixth Angel blew the trumpet & I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden alter, which is before God,
-
Saying to the sixth Angel, which had the trumpet, Loose the four Angels, which are bound in the great river Euphrates. [Footnote on this: "Meaning the enemies of the East country, which should afflict the Church of God, as did the Arabians, Sarasines, Turks, and Tartarians." (It mentions TARTARIANS in the footnote. Interesting!)]
-
And the four Angels were loosed, which were prepared at an hour, at a day, at a month, and at a year, to slay the third part of men.
Is it just me or does this sound a lot like the unleashing of the coronavirus on humanity?
The globalists have maybe controlled publishing for a long time, but great literature was at least still written and published in America: Faulkner, Hemingway, Steinbeck, Flannery O'Connor, et al. Now I see mostly crap. The height of good writing nowadays is supposedly Harry Potter. It's disheartening to say the least.
Funny that you mention the Protocols. I have been reading Giorgio Cattaneo's interviews of Mauro Biglino's, which book is titled The Naked Bible. Very interesting reading. Focuses on the actual Hebrew translations, particularly of terms like "Elohim", "Ruach", "Kavod"--words that typically get translated as "God", "Spirit", "Soul". Like I said, interesting reading.
But on page 167 I arrived at this statement: "The legendary historical falsehood of the 'Jewish-Masonic conspiracy' as set out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a document fabricated in 1903 by the Tsar's police, is eerily having a come-back, thanks to a certain contemporary conspiracy frenzy, the same that blames the Rothschild bankers for all the evils in the world." I wrote in the margin next to the Tsar's police statement "Proof?"
So did Allen Dulles "debunk" the Protocols by saying they were written by the Tsar's police? This was the first I had heard the Tsar's police named as the source of the Protocols (which I have not read yet, actually).
To hear you say it was Allen Dulles makes me say, they really are not creative at all. It's always "Russia, Russia, Russia."
The English translations do indeed lose all meaning. Good track to pursue.
Strange that the same man would poohpooh that the Rothschilds run the world through banking. They openly CLAIMED to do it, for crying out loud. What’s anti-semetic about not wanting to serve mammon to a Bible-related author?
I agree with you. I find The Naked Bible very interesting. But when I hit upon that statement on the Tsar's police creating The Protocols, I was like, "Really? You're presenting a book here all about being ACCURATE to what the Hebrew reads in the Old Testament, but then you're going to toss out a statement like that about what you know to be a very contentious subject with no proof or sourcing at all?" It reminds me of Zecharia Sitchin. The Twelfth Planet is fascinating reading, but when you find out that Sitchin was a 33rd degree mason, you have to ask yourself, where are the lies in the book? It may be mostly accurate information, but then there will be these misleading statements that you believe to be accurate because they're seeded in with the truth.
I like this one, but note that the text is VERY small.
https://www.hendricksonrose.com/stories/interlinear-bible
All of the authors you mention have direct ties to the Cabal. I'm not saying their work had nefarious intent, nor am I saying that "ties" equals complicity, but those ties are there, and for some they are quite profound. Further, I can make a case that many of their works were used as a form of social engineering by the Cabal. Regardless of intent all of their work was all allowed by the Cabal, indeed, promoted by it.
None of those authors would have made it big without Cabal allowance or intent. That is the key to understanding the system. It isn't that "everything is evil" (though far more than you might appreciate), it's that everything is controlled by Gatekeepers. Everything is allowed by the Gatekeepers or it doesn't exist at all in the public sphere. Anyone can create anything within one of the allowed boxes (there are many). If it pushes outside of the allowed boxes, it is nixed.
I'll have to check it out.
It was, according to history, written by Sergei Nilus. There is nothing that I have found that says he was part of the Tsar’s “police,” but he was a Russian and a member of the Aristocracy, though so was 99+% of everyone in our history books, so that says less than it might seem.
Dulles “debunked” it by saying it was plagiarized from a French work titled Dialogue aux Enfers enire Machiavel et Montequieu, 1865. Later that year Herman Bernstein, who was a disinformation agent for the Cabal, and who had a large influence on the history we got, wrote a book “proving” it a hoax, citing similarities between the two works.
These “debunkings” didn’t take, not because there weren’t some parallels between the two works, there were, but more likely because the parallels between reality and the Protocols were so incredible that it was pretty difficult to gaslight.
To put the idea of the Protocols to rest, they had a well publicized trial in Berne Switzerland, called the Berne Trial. This is the only reference I can find for the Protocols having ties to the “Czar’s Police.” As far as I can see on cursory inspection it was an accusation, not a proof. I don’t know what evidence they had to support it. I haven’t dug into this trial yet. I should probably do that. It would be interesting to see the evidence for both sides.
The reason I haven’t dug in is because it doesn’t really matter who wrote it imo. It is likely impossible to prove it was actually minutes from a Zionist meeting. From my perspective, what is really important about the Protocols is how eerily prophetic it is. Only by making it illegal to read (it was punishable by death in the Soviet Union to own it) can you keep people from reading it and coming to their own conclusion. It isn’t a convincing work because it is “anti-Semitic” (it isn’t actually anti-Semitic, it says explicitly that they use the Jews, their "lesser brethren" for their own purposes), it is convincing because it basically explains all of the evidence that one finds when one actually investigates history for themselves. Like, they make a statement in the Protocols, and when you go to find corroborating evidence it’s all over the place, and everything starts to make sense.
Regardless of original authorship, you can’t have something like that hanging around, thus it was a book that was literally (pun intended) put on trial in such a way that the entire world heard about its “debunking.”
It also set a precedence that said “no matter where you are, if you push this, we'll come after you.”
Thank you so much for your very thoughtful and sourced answers in this thread. I have saved them and will refer back to them. I genuinely appreciate you sharing your knowledge here. If you end up reading The Naked Bible, I'd be interested in your thoughts. I ordered it after hearing Clif High make repeated reference to it. I minored in Latin myself in college hoping to someday read The Vulgate in the original Latin and then work my way to New Testament Greek and Hebrew. Biglino actually did what I aspired to do, so I very much appreciate his efforts. Another writer I'm reading who is working along the same lines is Paul Wallis. His YT channel is @The5thKind . A very likable Australian guy. I've not started his book The Eden Conspiracy yet but intend to after I finish the Biglino book. Thank you again, fren.