that isthe interpretation the anon is wanting to apply. But does it actually mean that? Who knows. I guess the idea, however, is that if multiple interpretations align, then there is some message there...
I don't get the almost obsessive attention such things get however. When Q was posting, the deltas, 'coindencess' and cross references with Q+ had a very clear purpose, aka to verify and confirm the authenticity of Q and the connection between Q and Q+.
But what purpose does this 'comm' serve, if indeed it is a comm? I wonder if anons don't have better things to put their power and attention towards....
Like some others I'm a bit lost, mostly, well entirely really, due to:
No. I have no idea what that is referring to. Can someone shed some light on that?
Edit: I might have found it myself. I'm guessing it's referring to Entheos's post yesterday with "BING PING BONG", correct?
No. Look at the graphic. There is a Truth by Trump thurs night around 10:30 that only had “.”. It was deleted shortly afterward.
So a "." represents "ping"?
that isthe interpretation the anon is wanting to apply. But does it actually mean that? Who knows. I guess the idea, however, is that if multiple interpretations align, then there is some message there...
I don't get the almost obsessive attention such things get however. When Q was posting, the deltas, 'coindencess' and cross references with Q+ had a very clear purpose, aka to verify and confirm the authenticity of Q and the connection between Q and Q+.
But what purpose does this 'comm' serve, if indeed it is a comm? I wonder if anons don't have better things to put their power and attention towards....