that isthe interpretation the anon is wanting to apply. But does it actually mean that? Who knows. I guess the idea, however, is that if multiple interpretations align, then there is some message there...
I don't get the almost obsessive attention such things get however. When Q was posting, the deltas, 'coindencess' and cross references with Q+ had a very clear purpose, aka to verify and confirm the authenticity of Q and the connection between Q and Q+.
But what purpose does this 'comm' serve, if indeed it is a comm? I wonder if anons don't have better things to put their power and attention towards....
So a "." represents "ping"?
that isthe interpretation the anon is wanting to apply. But does it actually mean that? Who knows. I guess the idea, however, is that if multiple interpretations align, then there is some message there...
I don't get the almost obsessive attention such things get however. When Q was posting, the deltas, 'coindencess' and cross references with Q+ had a very clear purpose, aka to verify and confirm the authenticity of Q and the connection between Q and Q+.
But what purpose does this 'comm' serve, if indeed it is a comm? I wonder if anons don't have better things to put their power and attention towards....