Maybe. But at some point the rubber meets the road with this theory and it is no longer loose-leafed machinations, but a makeup trailer with a crack team applying masks everyday, or a recruitment and training scheme for doubles. Or myriad other practical, daily, needs to pull something like this off. If anything, you further begged the question.
but a makeup trailer with a crack team applying masks everyday, or a recruitment and training scheme for doubles.
Consider the fact that there are intel professionals whose job it is to do this kind of stuff. Now consider that these intel agencies are very much part of this system that wants to protect itself from exposure and would have no problem providing that expertise to an operation such as this if they have been led to believe that this is the only way to survive
Now also consider the fact that for decades if not centuries, we have been living in a world where optics and backstage happenings are not necessarily same, and keeping up the illusion - whether its politics or finance or wars or anything else - has been fundamental part of this world order.
So the additional effort, as you suggest the "myriad other practical, daily needs" - are but a drop in the bucket of all the fakery thats has always been part and parcel of the world we live in.
The circus is still the same it has always been, we are just forcing them to wear more blatant make up and do more blatant routines.
There are certainly intel professionals that are tasked with creating disguises, that has been been made public - But that is an entirely different task than impersonation - if you have a source I have not seen I'm super interested.
Impersonation is TOUGH. Think of any biopic you've seen recently with 'world class' actors and make-up people, it'll be a good approximation of the individual, but it's certainly not believable or achievable in a day-to-day replace a public figure sense. I don't see how anyone can extrapolate that out to any degree.
Again, I think anything else just begs the question more.
There are certainly intel professionals that are tasked with creating disguises, that has been been made public - But that is an entirely different task than impersonation - if you have a source I have not seen I'm super interested.
There is plenty about this in the public domain for a long time now. Just a quick search brings up a few interesting leads
Impersonation is TOUGH. Think of any biopic you've seen recently with 'world class' actors and make-up people, it'll be a good approximation of the individual, but it's certainly not believable or achievable in a day-to-day replace a public figure sense. I don't see how anyone can extrapolate that out to any degree.
They are not really trying to do impersonation at the level of biopics or anything else. Thats why most of us who have watched Joe Biden before 2020 realised very quickly that this guy is not the same. The reason for this, we can speculate, is part of the "WH trolling", where they want to seed the doubts for Awakening all over the place. Same level of trolling as Bill Gates saying if they do a really good job of vaccination they can reduce world population by 20%. Or Biden's video saying how he strong armed Ukraine prosecutor to drop investigation into his company.
It serves dual purpose of keeping this impersonation operation easy, while also using it to troll people.
Again, I think anything else just begs the question more.
Again, if you can articulate the questions, we can keep discussing them. Except for the deep seated belief that "this is too absurd to be real", I have not really seen any arguments that makes this impossible.
There is plenty about this in the public domain for a long time now. Just a quick search brings up a few interesting leads
I have seen those sources and it's very cool, but again disguise != impersonation.
Again, if you can articulate the questions, we can keep discussing them.
The problem with conversations about this topic, or body doubles, or god forbid 'clones', is that the burden of proof does not rest with me. I can ask a ton of questions (and do), but get hand-wavy answers ("they're trolling", for instance), or if someone wants to move beyond hand waving, the questions would be too pointed for any person not in on the job to speculate about. Asking questions about vague speculation is rough.
But, I'm curious so we can start with a baseline- It seems to me that you believe that Joe Biden has been replaced. Can you say when, and can you say with which method(s) he has been replaced?
Maybe. But at some point the rubber meets the road with this theory and it is no longer loose-leafed machinations, but a makeup trailer with a crack team applying masks everyday, or a recruitment and training scheme for doubles. Or myriad other practical, daily, needs to pull something like this off. If anything, you further begged the question.
Consider the fact that there are intel professionals whose job it is to do this kind of stuff. Now consider that these intel agencies are very much part of this system that wants to protect itself from exposure and would have no problem providing that expertise to an operation such as this if they have been led to believe that this is the only way to survive
Now also consider the fact that for decades if not centuries, we have been living in a world where optics and backstage happenings are not necessarily same, and keeping up the illusion - whether its politics or finance or wars or anything else - has been fundamental part of this world order.
So the additional effort, as you suggest the "myriad other practical, daily needs" - are but a drop in the bucket of all the fakery thats has always been part and parcel of the world we live in.
The circus is still the same it has always been, we are just forcing them to wear more blatant make up and do more blatant routines.
There are certainly intel professionals that are tasked with creating disguises, that has been been made public - But that is an entirely different task than impersonation - if you have a source I have not seen I'm super interested.
Impersonation is TOUGH. Think of any biopic you've seen recently with 'world class' actors and make-up people, it'll be a good approximation of the individual, but it's certainly not believable or achievable in a day-to-day replace a public figure sense. I don't see how anyone can extrapolate that out to any degree.
Again, I think anything else just begs the question more.
There is plenty about this in the public domain for a long time now. Just a quick search brings up a few interesting leads
A Former CIA Chief of Disguise Shows Off a Five-Second Mask
How Hyperreal Masks Keep Fooling People from 2020
An interview with Robert Barron crafted state-of-the-art silicone masks for CIA operatives, disguises that needed to pass close scrutiny from six to 12 inches away.
Celebrity Duplication and CIA Stunts with Analogue Mask Technology: Unveiling the Art and Ethics of Hyper-Realistic Disguises - Latest study dropped on researchgate.
They are not really trying to do impersonation at the level of biopics or anything else. Thats why most of us who have watched Joe Biden before 2020 realised very quickly that this guy is not the same. The reason for this, we can speculate, is part of the "WH trolling", where they want to seed the doubts for Awakening all over the place. Same level of trolling as Bill Gates saying if they do a really good job of vaccination they can reduce world population by 20%. Or Biden's video saying how he strong armed Ukraine prosecutor to drop investigation into his company.
It serves dual purpose of keeping this impersonation operation easy, while also using it to troll people.
Again, if you can articulate the questions, we can keep discussing them. Except for the deep seated belief that "this is too absurd to be real", I have not really seen any arguments that makes this impossible.
I have seen those sources and it's very cool, but again disguise != impersonation.
The problem with conversations about this topic, or body doubles, or god forbid 'clones', is that the burden of proof does not rest with me. I can ask a ton of questions (and do), but get hand-wavy answers ("they're trolling", for instance), or if someone wants to move beyond hand waving, the questions would be too pointed for any person not in on the job to speculate about. Asking questions about vague speculation is rough.
But, I'm curious so we can start with a baseline- It seems to me that you believe that Joe Biden has been replaced. Can you say when, and can you say with which method(s) he has been replaced?